Paper · 2006 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Quercetin Content in Field-Cured Onions (Allium cepa L.): Effects of Cultivar, Lifting Time, and Nitrogen Fertilizer Level

Lars M. Mogren; Marie E. Olsson; Ulla E. Gertsson

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
89
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Variation in quercetin content was investigated in field-cured onions (Allium cepa L.) that had been supplied with different nitrogen fertilizer levels and lifted at different developmental stages. Quercetin content varied significantly between years and was well correlated to global radiation in August. Field curing generally resulted in significant increases in quercetin content compared to levels at lifting. Nitrogen fertilizer level did not affect quercetin content, suggesting that nitrogen leakage from soil may be minimized without effects on flavonol content. Lifting time had minor effects on quercetin content in field-cured onions. Cultivar differences in quercetin content were significant but not consistent in all years. Quercetin content increased significantly less in dark environments compared to field curing, but some quercetin synthesis occurred regardless of light. Field curing with or without foliage still attached did not affect quercetin content, suggesting that no transportation from the foliage to the scales occurred.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion quercetin differed by year.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepat0
Outcome
Quercetin contente0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quercetin content varied significantly between years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field-Cured Onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion quercetin correlated with August global radiation.

Taxon
OnionsAllium cepat0
Outcome
Quercetin contente0
Setting
Auguste0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quercetin content varied significantly between years and was well correlated to global radiation in August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–304 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Field curing increased onion quercetin compared with lifting.

Taxon
OnionsAllium cepat0
Treatment
Field curinge0
Outcome
quercetin contente0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
levels at liftinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field curing generally resulted in significant increases in quercetin content compared to levels at lifting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer level did not affect onion quercetin.

Taxon
OnionsAllium cepat0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizer levele0
Outcome
quercetin contente0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilizer level did not affect quercetin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lifting time had minor effects on onion quercetin.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Treatment
Lifting timee0
Outcome
quercetin contente0
Direction
minor effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lifting time had minor effects on quercetin content in field-cured onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–645 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion cultivar differences in quercetin were significant but varied by year.

Taxon
OnionsAllium cepat0
Material
Cultivare0
Outcome
quercetin contente0
Qualifier
not consistent in all yearse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar differences in quercetin content were significant but not consistent in all years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion quercetin increased less in darkness than with field curing.

Taxon
OnionsAllium cepat0
Treatment
dark environmentse0
Outcome
Quercetin contente0
Direction
increased significantly lesse0
Comparator
field curinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quercetin content increased significantly less in dark environments compared to field curing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some onion quercetin synthesis occurred regardless of light.

Taxon
OnionsAllium cepat0
Outcome
quercetin synthesise0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some quercetin synthesis occurred regardless of light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Retaining foliage during field curing did not change onion quercetin.

Taxon
OnionsAllium cepat0
Treatment
Field curing with or without foliage still attachede0
Outcome
quercetin contente0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field curing with or without foliage still attached did not affect quercetin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑

light · molecular: metabolites · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 18 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.