Paper · 1996 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Influence of lime and calcium:magnesium ratio on alfalfa and birdsfoot trefoil yields

W. Shaw Reid

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A study was established in 1974 to examine the effects of lime and calcium:magnesium (Ca:Mg) ratio in the limes on alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) hay yields and botanical composition of the hay. Lime was applied at rates of 0, 6.7, 13.4, 20.2, and 33.6 Mg/ha to an acid (pH 4.7) Mardin silt loam soil (coarse‐loamy, mixed, mesic typic Fragiochrepts). Using four commercially available lime sources and two mixtures of these lime sources, six Ca:Mg ratios were established for each lime rate. Calcium and/or magnesium sulfate were applied to plots that received no lime to obtain Ca:Mg ratios similar to those on the limed plots. The initial Morgan's solution extractable Ca was 450 mg/kg and Mg was 25 mg/kg. A 5 × 5 Latin Square design with five lime rates and five replications was used with the six Ca:Mg ratios as lime subplots. To improve mixing, portions of each lime treatment were applied before and after plowing in 1974 and after plowing in April of 1975. Alfalfa and birdsfoot trefoil were planted to one‐half of each plot. The hay was harvested two or three times each year for five years. The alfalfa hay yield and legume component were significantly increased by the first two increments of lime (6.7 and 13.4 Mg/ha); however, the birdsfoot trefoil hay and legume component were significantly increased only by the first increment of lime. Maximum yields for the legume component of both crops occurred at a soil pH of 6.5. The Ca:Mg ratios resulting from adding limes with different Ca and Mg contents had no significant effects on the total dry matter hay yields, percent legume in hay or alfalfa and birdsfoot trefoil yields. It is difficult to justify the use of Ca and Mg base saturation ratios for lime recommendations, or for determining the Mg concentration needed within the lime. Soil samples taken in fall of 1976 had mean soil pH values of 4.6, 5.7, 6.1, 6.4, and 6.7 for the five lime rates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime at the first two increments significantly increased alfalfa hay yield.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
first two increments of lime (6.7 and 13.4 Mg/ha)e0
Outcome
hay yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The alfalfa hay yield and legume component were significantly increased by the first two increments of lime (6.7 and 13.4 Mg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime at the first two increments significantly increased the alfalfa legume component.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
first two increments of lime (6.7 and 13.4 Mg/ha)e0
Outcome
legume componente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The alfalfa hay yield and legume component were significantly increased by the first two increments of lime (6.7 and 13.4 Mg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only the first lime increment significantly increased birdsfoot trefoil hay.

Taxon
birdsfoot trefoile0
Treatment
first increment of limee0
Outcome
haye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the birdsfoot trefoil hay and legume component were significantly increased only by the first increment of lime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only the first lime increment significantly increased the birdsfoot trefoil legume component.

Taxon
birdsfoot trefoile0
Treatment
first increment of limee0
Outcome
legume componente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the birdsfoot trefoil hay and legume component were significantly increased only by the first increment of lime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1402 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum legume component yield of both crops occurred at soil pH 6.5.

Taxon
both cropse0
Outcome
yields for the legume componente0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
6.5e0

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum yields for the legume component of both crops occurred at a soil pH of 6.5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime source Ca:Mg ratios had no significant effect on total hay dry matter yield.

Taxon
alfalfa and birdsfoot trefoile0
Treatment
Ca:Mg ratiose0
Outcome
total dry matter hay yieldse0
Direction
no significant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The Ca:Mg ratios resulting from adding limes with different Ca and Mg contents had no significant effects on the total dry matter hay yields, percent legume in hay or alfalfa and birdsfoot trefoil yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime source Ca:Mg ratios had no significant effect on percent legume in hay.

Taxon
alfalfa and birdsfoot trefoile0
Treatment
Ca:Mg ratiose0
Outcome
percent legume in haye0
Direction
no significant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The Ca:Mg ratios resulting from adding limes with different Ca and Mg contents had no significant effects on the total dry matter hay yields, percent legume in hay or alfalfa and birdsfoot trefoil yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime source Ca:Mg ratios had no significant effect on alfalfa yield.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Ca:Mg ratiose0
Outcome
alfalfa and birdsfoot trefoil yieldse0
Direction
no significant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Ca:Mg ratios resulting from adding limes with different Ca and Mg contents had no significant effects on the total dry matter hay yields, percent legume in hay or alfalfa and birdsfoot trefoil yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1691 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Ca:Mg base saturation ratios are difficult to justify for lime recommendations.

Outcome
use of Ca and Mg base saturation ratios for lime recommendationse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“It is difficult to justify the use of Ca and Mg base saturation ratios for lime recommendations, or for determining the Mg concentration needed within the lime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1852 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

calcium atom · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

lime · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

50 papers: 41 positive, 9 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.