Paper · 1969 · Crop Science

Effects of Leaf and Stem Diseases on Yield and Quality of Alfalfa Forage1

W. G. Willis; D. L. Stuteville; E. L. Sorensen

18
claims
43
verbatim quotes
24
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots (Average of four varieties in four cuttings). Disease control increased carotene content 21% (third cutting) and decreased stem defoliation 18%. Increases in annual forage yields in MT/ha, for sprayed over unsprayed plots, respectively, were ‘Cody’ 1.57 (8.8%), ‘Lahontan’ 3.47 (21.1%), ‘Ranger’ 3.11 (19.4%), and ‘Vernal’ 3.11 (26.9%). Phoma medicaginis and Leptosphaerulina briosiana were the major pathogens in the first and second cuttings. Their control increased yields of Cody 4%, Lahontan 14%, Ranger 19%, and Vernal 19% for the first two cuttings combined. Cercospora zebrina was the principal pathogen in the third and fourth cuttings. Control of C. zebrina increased yields of Cody 16%, Ranger 29%, Lahontan 30%, and Vernal 38% for the third and fourth cuttings combined. Corresponding increases in carotene content for the third cutting were 17, 20, 45, and 10%, respectively. Defoliation was reduced by spray treatments. Protein percentage was not affected.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly spraying to control leaf and stem diseases increased alfalfa hay yield by 2.8 MT/ha (18%) over unsprayed plots.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
sprayed weeklye1
Outcome
haye1
Direction
moree1
Value
2.8 MT/ha (18%)e1
Comparator
unsprayed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease control increased carotene content of alfalfa by 21% in the third cutting.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
Disease controle2
Outcome
carotene contente2
Direction
increasede2
Value
21%e2
Qualifier
third cuttinge2
Comparator
unsprayed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e2

“Disease control increased carotene content 21% (third cutting) and decreased stem defoliation 18%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease control decreased stem defoliation of alfalfa by 18%.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
Disease controle2
Outcome
stem defoliatione2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
18%e2
Comparator
unsprayed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e2

“Disease control increased carotene content 21% (third cutting) and decreased stem defoliation 18%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–343 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phoma medicaginis and Leptosphaerulina briosiana were the major pathogens of alfalfa in the first and second cuttings.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Organ / stage
first and second cuttingse3
Interactor
Phoma medicaginisAscochyta medicaginicolae3pathogen
Second interactor
Leptosphaerulina briosianaLeptosphaerulina trifoliie3pathogen
Outcome
major pathogense3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Leptosphaerulina trifolii
Leptosphaerulina trifolii · Second interactorJake Dalzell · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e3

“Phoma medicaginis and Leptosphaerulina briosiana were the major pathogens in the first and second cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of the first- and second-cutting pathogens increased yield of Cody alfalfa by 4% in the first two cuttings combined.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Material
Codye4
Treatment
Their controle4
Interactor
Phoma medicaginisAscochyta medicaginicolae3pathogen
Second interactor
Leptosphaerulina briosianaLeptosphaerulina trifoliie3pathogen
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
4%e4
Qualifier
for the first two cuttings combinede4
Comparator
unsprayed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Leptosphaerulina trifolii
Leptosphaerulina trifolii · Second interactorJake Dalzell · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e3

“Phoma medicaginis and Leptosphaerulina briosiana were the major pathogens in the first and second cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–643 · show in text ↑
e4

“Their control increased yields of Cody 4%, Lahontan 14%, Ranger 19%, and Vernal 19% for the first two cuttings combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of the first- and second-cutting pathogens increased yield of Lahontan alfalfa by 14% in the first two cuttings combined.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Material
Lahontane4
Treatment
Their controle4
Interactor
Phoma medicaginisAscochyta medicaginicolae3pathogen
Second interactor
Leptosphaerulina briosianaLeptosphaerulina trifoliie3pathogen
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
14%e4
Qualifier
for the first two cuttings combinede4
Comparator
unsprayed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Leptosphaerulina trifolii
Leptosphaerulina trifolii · Second interactorJake Dalzell · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e3

“Phoma medicaginis and Leptosphaerulina briosiana were the major pathogens in the first and second cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–643 · show in text ↑
e4

“Their control increased yields of Cody 4%, Lahontan 14%, Ranger 19%, and Vernal 19% for the first two cuttings combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of the first- and second-cutting pathogens increased yield of Ranger alfalfa by 19% in the first two cuttings combined.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Material
Rangere4
Treatment
Their controle4
Interactor
Phoma medicaginisAscochyta medicaginicolae3pathogen
Second interactor
Leptosphaerulina briosianaLeptosphaerulina trifoliie3pathogen
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
19%e4
Qualifier
for the first two cuttings combinede4
Comparator
unsprayed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Leptosphaerulina trifolii
Leptosphaerulina trifolii · Second interactorJake Dalzell · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e3

“Phoma medicaginis and Leptosphaerulina briosiana were the major pathogens in the first and second cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–643 · show in text ↑
e4

“Their control increased yields of Cody 4%, Lahontan 14%, Ranger 19%, and Vernal 19% for the first two cuttings combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of the first- and second-cutting pathogens increased yield of Vernal alfalfa by 19% in the first two cuttings combined.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Material
Vernale4
Treatment
Their controle4
Interactor
Phoma medicaginisAscochyta medicaginicolae3pathogen
Second interactor
Leptosphaerulina briosianaLeptosphaerulina trifoliie3pathogen
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
19%e4
Qualifier
for the first two cuttings combinede4
Comparator
unsprayed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Leptosphaerulina trifolii
Leptosphaerulina trifolii · Second interactorJake Dalzell · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e3

“Phoma medicaginis and Leptosphaerulina briosiana were the major pathogens in the first and second cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–643 · show in text ↑
e4

“Their control increased yields of Cody 4%, Lahontan 14%, Ranger 19%, and Vernal 19% for the first two cuttings combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–764 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cercospora zebrina was the principal pathogen of alfalfa in the third and fourth cuttings.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Organ / stage
third and fourth cuttingse5
Interactor
Cercospora zebrinaCercospora zebrinae5pathogen
Outcome
principal pathogene5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Cercospora zebrina
Cercospora zebrina · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e5

“Cercospora zebrina was the principal pathogen in the third and fourth cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of C. zebrina increased yield of Cody alfalfa by 16% in the third and fourth cuttings combined.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Material
Codye6
Treatment
Control of C. zebrinae6
Interactor
C. zebrinaCercospora zebrinae6pathogen
Outcome
yieldse6
Direction
increasede6
Value
16%e6
Qualifier
for the third and fourth cuttings combinede6
Comparator
unsprayed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Cercospora zebrina
Cercospora zebrina · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e6

“Control of C. zebrina increased yields of Cody 16%, Ranger 29%, Lahontan 30%, and Vernal 38% for the third and fourth cuttings combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of C. zebrina increased yield of Ranger alfalfa by 29% in the third and fourth cuttings combined.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Material
Rangere6
Treatment
Control of C. zebrinae6
Interactor
C. zebrinaCercospora zebrinae6pathogen
Outcome
yieldse6
Direction
increasede6
Value
29%e6
Qualifier
for the third and fourth cuttings combinede6
Comparator
unsprayed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Cercospora zebrina
Cercospora zebrina · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e6

“Control of C. zebrina increased yields of Cody 16%, Ranger 29%, Lahontan 30%, and Vernal 38% for the third and fourth cuttings combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of C. zebrina increased yield of Lahontan alfalfa by 30% in the third and fourth cuttings combined.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Material
Lahontane6
Treatment
Control of C. zebrinae6
Interactor
C. zebrinaCercospora zebrinae6pathogen
Outcome
yieldse6
Direction
increasede6
Value
30%e6
Qualifier
for the third and fourth cuttings combinede6
Comparator
unsprayed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Cercospora zebrina
Cercospora zebrina · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e6

“Control of C. zebrina increased yields of Cody 16%, Ranger 29%, Lahontan 30%, and Vernal 38% for the third and fourth cuttings combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of C. zebrina increased yield of Vernal alfalfa by 38% in the third and fourth cuttings combined.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Material
Vernale6
Treatment
Control of C. zebrinae6
Interactor
C. zebrinaCercospora zebrinae6pathogen
Outcome
yieldse6
Direction
increasede6
Value
38%e6
Qualifier
for the third and fourth cuttings combinede6
Comparator
unsprayed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Cercospora zebrina
Cercospora zebrina · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e6

“Control of C. zebrina increased yields of Cody 16%, Ranger 29%, Lahontan 30%, and Vernal 38% for the third and fourth cuttings combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of C. zebrina increased carotene content of Cody alfalfa by 17 in the third cutting.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Material
Codye6
Treatment
Control of C. zebrinae6
Interactor
C. zebrinaCercospora zebrinae6pathogen
Outcome
carotene contente7
Direction
increasese7
Value
17e7
Qualifier
third cuttinge7
Comparator
unsprayed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Cercospora zebrina
Cercospora zebrina · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e6

“Control of C. zebrina increased yields of Cody 16%, Ranger 29%, Lahontan 30%, and Vernal 38% for the third and fourth cuttings combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–981 · show in text ↑
e7

“Corresponding increases in carotene content for the third cutting were 17, 20, 45, and 10%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of C. zebrina increased carotene content of Ranger alfalfa by 20 in the third cutting.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Material
Rangere6
Treatment
Control of C. zebrinae6
Interactor
C. zebrinaCercospora zebrinae6pathogen
Outcome
carotene contente7
Direction
increasese7
Value
20e7
Qualifier
third cuttinge7
Comparator
unsprayed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Cercospora zebrina
Cercospora zebrina · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e6

“Control of C. zebrina increased yields of Cody 16%, Ranger 29%, Lahontan 30%, and Vernal 38% for the third and fourth cuttings combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–981 · show in text ↑
e7

“Corresponding increases in carotene content for the third cutting were 17, 20, 45, and 10%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of C. zebrina increased carotene content of Lahontan alfalfa by 45 in the third cutting.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Material
Lahontane6
Treatment
Control of C. zebrinae6
Interactor
C. zebrinaCercospora zebrinae6pathogen
Outcome
carotene contente7
Direction
increasese7
Value
45e7
Qualifier
third cuttinge7
Comparator
unsprayed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Cercospora zebrina
Cercospora zebrina · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e6

“Control of C. zebrina increased yields of Cody 16%, Ranger 29%, Lahontan 30%, and Vernal 38% for the third and fourth cuttings combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–981 · show in text ↑
e7

“Corresponding increases in carotene content for the third cutting were 17, 20, 45, and 10%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control of C. zebrina increased carotene content of Vernal alfalfa by 10% in the third cutting.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Material
Vernale6
Treatment
Control of C. zebrinae6
Interactor
C. zebrinaCercospora zebrinae6pathogen
Outcome
carotene contente7
Direction
increasese7
Value
10%e7
Qualifier
third cuttinge7
Comparator
unsprayed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Cercospora zebrina
Cercospora zebrina · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e6

“Control of C. zebrina increased yields of Cody 16%, Ranger 29%, Lahontan 30%, and Vernal 38% for the third and fourth cuttings combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–981 · show in text ↑
e7

“Corresponding increases in carotene content for the third cutting were 17, 20, 45, and 10%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray treatment did not affect protein percentage of alfalfa.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
sprayed weeklye1
Outcome
Protein percentagee2
Direction
not affectede2
Comparator
unsprayed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field plots of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., sprayed weekly with Dithane M‐45 during the 1965 growing season to control leaf and stem diseases yielded 2.8 MT/ha (18%) more hay than did unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
e2

“Protein percentage was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1169 · show in text ↑

application · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.