Paper · 2011 · Agronomy Journal

Abiotic Stress Effects on Plant Growth and Yield Components of 1‐MCP Treated Cotton Plants

Vladimir A. da Costa; J. Tom Cothren; Josh B. Bynum

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Boll abortion is increased when cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) experiences various stresses during its reproductive development that can consequently reduce lint yield. Before abscission, an increase in ethylene is observed which may be assumed to be the signal necessary to initiate abscission of that particular structure. It is desirable to prevent fruit loss that may be induced by the peak in ethylene before abscission. One potential option to cope with the loss of cotton reproductive structures is the use of ethylene inhibitors. Thus, the objective of this investigation was to determine the impact of 1‐methylcyclopropene (1‐MCP) on growth and yield components of cotton plants treated with ethephon (ethylene synthetic hormone) under field conditions. Field studies were conducted as a randomized complete block design with four replications in 2007 and 2008. Treatments were three rates of 1‐MCP in combination with a surfactant applied at mid‐bloom. One day later, ethephon was applied as a source of abiotic stress. At harvest, the fruit set in the upper portion of the canopy was influenced by 1‐MCP. It had a greater number of full size, yet immature bolls, which potentially could have had a positive influence in the lint yield. However, ethephon caused the highest lint yield since ethephon‐treated plants had more open as well as total bolls in the lower canopy at harvest. In conclusion, 1‐MCP improved growth and yield components mainly in the upper portion of plants canopy at harvest, but such an improvement was not converted into lint yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP affected upper-canopy fruit set at harvest.

Treatment
1‐MCPe0
Outcome
fruit set in the upper portion of the canopye0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“At harvest, the fruit set in the upper portion of the canopy was influenced by 1‐MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP produced more full-size immature upper-canopy bolls.

Outcome
number of full size, yet immature bollse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It had a greater number of full size, yet immature bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon produced the highest lint yield.

Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethephon caused the highest lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon-treated plants had more open and total lower-canopy bolls at harvest.

Organ / stage
lower canopye0
Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
open as well as total bollse0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethephon‐treated plants had more open as well as total bolls in the lower canopy at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP improved growth and yield components mainly in the upper canopy.

Treatment
1‐MCPe0
Outcome
growth and yield componentse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
mainly in the upper portion of plants canopy at harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1‐MCP improved growth and yield components mainly in the upper portion of plants canopy at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1-MCP improvement did not translate into lint yield.

Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“such an improvement was not converted into lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.