Abstract
Research was conducted in Texas from 2010 through 2012 to evaluate combinations of pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynil for weed control and grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] response. In most instances, combinations of pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynil applied early postemergence controlled Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats), devil's‐claw [ Proboscidea louisianica (Mill.) Thellung], pitted morningglory ( Ipomoea lacunosa L.), and smellmelon [ Cucumis melo L. subsp. agrestis (Naudin) Pangalo var. dudaim (L.) Naudin (syn. Cucumis melo L. var. dudaim Naud.)] at least 81%. However, these combinations controlled Texas millet [( Urochloa texana (Buckl.) L.] no more than 72%. Horse purslane ( Trianthema portulacastrum L.) was controlled completely when pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynil was applied to plants ≤10 cm in height but no more than 65% when applied to taller plants. Pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynil combinations injured grain sorghum transiently and injury was not apparent later in the season. Early season injury caused by combinations of pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynil did not adversely affect yield except in the case of pyrasulfotole at 0.03 kg a.i./ha plus bromoxynil at 0.20 kg a.i./ha plus atrazine at 0.58 kg a.i./ha plus dicamba at 0.13 kg a.i./ha. Results from this research indicate that combinations of pyrasulfotole and bromoxynil can be effective in managing problematic weeds in Texas.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Early application controlled Palmer amaranth by at least 81%.
- Taxon
- grain sorghum
Sorghum bicolore1 - Treatment
- combinations of pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynile0
- Interactor
- Palmer amaranthe0weed
- Outcome
- controlled Palmer amaranthe0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- at least 81%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“combinations of pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynil applied early postemergence controlled Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats), devil's‐claw [ Proboscidea louisianica (Mill.) Thellung], pitted morningglory ( Ipomoea lacunosa L.), and smellmelon [ Cucumis melo L. subsp. agrestis (Naudin) Pangalo var. dudaim (L.) Naudin (syn. Cucumis melo L. var. dudaim Naud.)] at least 81%”
e1“grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]”
Claim · model-written summary
Early application controlled devil’s-claw, pitted morningglory and smellmelon by at least 81%.
- Taxon
- grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
- Treatment
- combinations of pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynile0
- Interactor
- devil's‐clawe0weed
- Outcome
- controllede0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- at least 81%e0
- Qualifier
- pitted morningglorye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“combinations of pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynil applied early postemergence controlled Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats), devil's‐claw [ Proboscidea louisianica (Mill.) Thellung], pitted morningglory ( Ipomoea lacunosa L.), and smellmelon [ Cucumis melo L. subsp. agrestis (Naudin) Pangalo var. dudaim (L.) Naudin (syn. Cucumis melo L. var. dudaim Naud.)] at least 81%”
e1“grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]”
Claim · model-written summary
The combinations controlled Texas millet by no more than 72%.
- Taxon
- grain sorghumSorghum bicolore2
- Treatment
- combinations of pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynile1
- Interactor
- Texas millete0weed
- Outcome
- controlled Texas millete0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- 72%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“these combinations controlled Texas millet [( Urochloa texana (Buckl.) L.] no more than 72%”
e1“combinations of pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynil applied early postemergence”
e2“grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]”
Claim · model-written summary
Horse purslane control was complete when plants were at most 10 cm tall.
- Taxon
- grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
- Treatment
- pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynile0
- Interactor
- Horse purslanee0weed
- Outcome
- Horse purslanee0
- Direction
- controlled completelye0
- Qualifier
- plants ≤10 cm in heighte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Horse purslane ( Trianthema portulacastrum L.) was controlled completely when pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynil was applied to plants ≤10 cm in height”
e1“grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]”
Claim · model-written summary
Horse purslane control was no more than 65% on taller plants.
- Taxon
- grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
- Treatment
- pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynile0
- Interactor
- Horse purslanee0weed
- Outcome
- Horse purslanee0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- 65%e0
- Qualifier
- taller plantse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Horse purslane ( Trianthema portulacastrum L.) was controlled completely when pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynil was applied to plants ≤10 cm in height but no more than 65% when applied to taller plants”
e1“grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]”
Claim · model-written summary
The combinations caused transient sorghum injury.
- Taxon
- grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
- Treatment
- Pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynil combinationse0
- Outcome
- injured grain sorghume0
- Direction
- injurede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynil combinations injured grain sorghum transiently and injury was not apparent later in the season”
Claim · model-written summary
Early injury generally did not adversely affect yield.
- Taxon
- grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
- Treatment
- combinations of pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynile0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- did not adversely affecte0
- Qualifier
- except in the case of pyrasulfotole at 0.03 kg a.i./ha plus bromoxynil at 0.20 kg a.i./ha plus atrazine at 0.58 kg a.i./ha plus dicamba at 0.13 kg a.i./hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Early season injury caused by combinations of pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynil did not adversely affect yield except in the case of pyrasulfotole at 0.03 kg a.i./ha plus bromoxynil at 0.20 kg a.i./ha plus atrazine at 0.58 kg a.i./ha plus dicamba at 0.13 kg a.i./ha”
e1“grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]”
The same questions in other papers
pyrasulfotole · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile · control · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.