Paper · 1984 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Iron uptake by plants and deficiency correction from an irradiated Fe fertilizer source

W.B. Anderson; S.K. Khattari

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Chelated Fe fertilizer (FeEDDHA) was irradiated and applied . at five rates to three soils classified as Lake Charles clay (C), Zapata clay loam (CL), and Edna sandy loam (SL). Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) plants were grown in a greenhouse. Plant 59Fe concentration, uptake, fertilizer efficiency and magnitude of Fe fertilizer fixation were studied independently from indigenous Fe. The clay and sandy loam soils had exhibited occasional Fe deficiency problems, whereas, the clay loam soil caused extremely severe Fe chlorosis. In this clay loam soil, correction of Fe chlorosis with FeEDDHA was nil. The concentration of 59Fe in plants was determined using a Ge‐Li detector, and the total Fe (indigenous + 59Fe) by atomic absorption spectrophotometry, while the indigenous Fe was calculated by difference. The 59Fe concentration and uptake in the plants increased with applied rates regardless of soil type. Second crop plants had less 59Fe than the first crop at all Fe levels. Sorghum plants absorbed similar amounts of total Fe (Fe + 59Fe) per unit weight of dry matter regardless of soil type or Fe rate. Indigenous Fe uptake was enhanced by Fe fertilization. Plants grown in Fe treated soils had 2 fold greater indigenous Fe concentrations than those in the controls. Indigenous Fe concentrations in plants ranged as high as 400 fold that of 59Fe taken up from applied fertilizer. Maximum 59Fe fertilizer efficiency (% plant recovery) was 1.2%. Very low amounts of DTPA extractable 59Fe were obtained from the different soils indicating that the greater portion of applied Fe was fixed. Although rather high rates of soil applied Fe are often required to correct Fe chlorosis, small applications strikingly stimulate uptake of indigenous Fe and plant growth response.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 59Fe concentration and uptake in sorghum increased with applied Fe rates

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore2
Treatment
applied ratese1
Outcome
59Fe concentration and uptakee1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
greenhousee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) plants were grown in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–255 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 59Fe concentration and uptake in the plants increased with applied rates regardless of soil type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–924 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second crop plants had less 59Fe than the first crop

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore2
Outcome
59Fee3
Direction
lesse3
Comparator
first crope3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) plants were grown in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–255 · show in text ↑
e3

“Second crop plants had less 59Fe than the first crop at all Fe levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–995 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum absorbed similar total Fe per unit dry matter regardless of soil type or Fe rate

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore2
Outcome
total Fe (Fe + 59Fe) per unit weight of dry mattere4
Qualifier
regardless of soil type or Fe ratee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) plants were grown in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–255 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sorghum plants absorbed similar amounts of total Fe (Fe + 59Fe) per unit weight of dry matter regardless of soil type or Fe rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe fertilization enhanced indigenous Fe uptake

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore2
Treatment
Fe fertilizatione5
Outcome
Indigenous Fe uptakee5
Direction
enhancede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) plants were grown in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–255 · show in text ↑
e5

“Indigenous Fe uptake was enhanced by Fe fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants grown in Fe treated soils had 2 fold greater indigenous Fe concentrations than controls

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore2
Treatment
Fe treated soilse6
Outcome
indigenous Fe concentrationse6
Direction
greatere6
Value
2 folde6
Comparator
controlse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) plants were grown in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–255 · show in text ↑
e6

“Plants grown in Fe treated soils had 2 fold greater indigenous Fe concentrations than those in the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1289 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indigenous Fe concentrations in sorghum ranged as high as 400 fold the 59Fe taken up from applied fertilizer

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore2
Outcome
Indigenous Fe concentrations in plantse7
Value
400 folde7
Qualifier
ranged as high ase7
Comparator
59Fe taken up from applied fertilizere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) plants were grown in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–255 · show in text ↑
e7

“Indigenous Fe concentrations in plants ranged as high as 400 fold that of 59Fe taken up from applied fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1402 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum 59Fe fertilizer efficiency was 1.2%

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore2
Outcome
59Fe fertilizer efficiency (% plant recovery)e3
Value
1.2%e3
Qualifier
Maximume3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) plants were grown in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–255 · show in text ↑
e3

“Maximum 59Fe fertilizer efficiency (% plant recovery) was 1.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1466 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Very low amounts of DTPA extractable 59Fe were obtained from the soils

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore2
Outcome
DTPA extractable 59Fee4
Qualifier
Very low amountse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) plants were grown in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–255 · show in text ↑
e4

“Very low amounts of DTPA extractable 59Fe were obtained from the different soils indicating that the greater portion of applied Fe was fixed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1608 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greater portion of applied Fe was fixed in the soil

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore2
Outcome
DTPA extractable 59Fee4
Qualifier
the greater portion of applied Fe was fixede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) plants were grown in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–255 · show in text ↑
e4

“Very low amounts of DTPA extractable 59Fe were obtained from the different soils indicating that the greater portion of applied Fe was fixed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small Fe applications stimulated indigenous Fe uptake and plant growth response

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore2
Treatment
small applicationse4
Outcome
uptake of indigenous Fe and plant growth responsee4
Direction
stimulatee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) plants were grown in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–255 · show in text ↑
e4

“small applications strikingly stimulate uptake of indigenous Fe and plant growth response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeEDDHA did not correct Fe chlorosis in the clay loam soil

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore2
Treatment
FeEDDHAe4
Outcome
correction of Fe chlorosise4
Direction
nile4
Setting
clay loam soile4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) plants were grown in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–255 · show in text ↑
e4

“In this clay loam soil, correction of Fe chlorosis with FeEDDHA was nil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–616 · show in text ↑

iron atom · nutrient: content · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.