Paper · 2000 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Effects of drought on photosynthesis in Mediterranean plants grown under enhanced UV-B radiation

S. Nogues

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
344
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of drought on the photosynthetic characteristics of three Mediterranean plants (olive, Olea europea L.; rosemary, Rosmarinus officinalis L.; lavender, Lavandula stoechas L.) exposed to elevated UV-B irradiation in a glasshouse were investigated over a period of weeks. Drought conditions were imposed on 2-year-old plants by withholding water. During the onset of water stress, analyses of the response of net carbon assimilation of leaves to their intercellular CO2 concentration were used to examine the potential limitations imposed by stomata, carboxylation velocity and capacity for regeneration of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate on photosynthesis. Measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence were used to determine changes in the efficiency of light utilization for electron transport, the occurrence of photoinhibition of photosystem II photochemistry and the possibility of stomatal patchiness across leaves. The first stages of water stress produced decreases in the light-saturated rate of CO2 assimilation which were accompanied by decreases in the maximum carboxylation velocity and the capacity for regeneration of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate in the absence of any significant photodamage to photosystem II. Leaves of rosemary and lavender were more sensitive than those of olive during the first stages of the drought treatment and also exhibited increases in stomatal limitation. With increasing water stress, significant decreases in the maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistry occurred in lavender and rosemary, and stomatal limitation was increased in olive. No indication of any heterogeneity of photosynthesis was found in any leaves. Drought treatment significantly decreased leaf area in all species, an important factor in drought-induced decreases in photosynthetic productivity. Exposure of plants to elevated UV-B radiation (0.47 W m(-2)) prior to and during the drought treatment had no significant effects on the growth or photosynthetic activities of the plants. Consequently, it is predicted that increasing UV-B due to future stratospheric ozone depletion is unlikely to have any significant impact on the photosynthetic productivity of olive, lavender and rosemary in the field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial drought decreased light-saturated CO2 assimilation.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae2
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
light-saturated rate of CO2 assimilatione0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The first stages of water stress produced decreases in the light-saturated rate of CO2 assimilation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1020 · show in text ↑
e2

“three Mediterranean plants (olive, Olea europea L.; rosemary, Rosmarinus officinalis L.; lavender, Lavandula stoechas L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial drought decreased maximum carboxylation velocity.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae2
Treatment
water stresse1
Outcome
maximum carboxylation velocitye0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreases in the maximum carboxylation velocity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1094 · show in text ↑
e2

“three Mediterranean plants (olive, Olea europea L.; rosemary, Rosmarinus officinalis L.; lavender, Lavandula stoechas L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–185 · show in text ↑
e1

“The first stages of water stress produced decreases in the light-saturated rate of CO2 assimilation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial drought decreased capacity for ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate regeneration.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae2
Treatment
water stresse1
Outcome
capacity for regeneration of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphatee0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreases in the maximum carboxylation velocity and the capacity for regeneration of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1157 · show in text ↑
e2

“three Mediterranean plants (olive, Olea europea L.; rosemary, Rosmarinus officinalis L.; lavender, Lavandula stoechas L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–185 · show in text ↑
e1

“The first stages of water stress produced decreases in the light-saturated rate of CO2 assimilation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1020 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The initial stress response occurred without significant photosystem II photodamage.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae2
Outcome
absence of any significant photodamage to photosystem IIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the absence of any significant photodamage to photosystem II”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1221 · show in text ↑
e2

“three Mediterranean plants (olive, Olea europea L.; rosemary, Rosmarinus officinalis L.; lavender, Lavandula stoechas L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–185 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rosemary and lavender leaves were more sensitive than olive leaves during early drought.

Taxon
rosemarySalvia rosmarinuse0
Outcome
more sensitivee0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
olivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves of rosemary and lavender were more sensitive than those of olive during the first stages of the drought treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early drought increased stomatal limitation in rosemary and lavender.

Taxon
rosemarySalvia rosmarinuse0
Treatment
drought treatmente0
Outcome
stomatal limitatione0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves of rosemary and lavender were more sensitive than those of olive during the first stages of the drought treatment and also exhibited increases in stomatal limitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing water stress significantly decreased photosystem II maximum quantum efficiency in lavender and rosemary.

Treatment
increasing water stresse0
Outcome
maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistrye0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lavandula angustifolia
Lavandula angustifolia · TaxonAndrey Zharkikh · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing water stress, significant decreases in the maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistry occurred in lavender and rosemary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing water stress increased stomatal limitation in olive.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
increasing water stresse0
Outcome
stomatal limitatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing water stress, significant decreases in the maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistry occurred in lavender and rosemary, and stomatal limitation was increased in olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1597 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No leaf showed heterogeneity of photosynthesis.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae2
Outcome
No indication of any heterogeneity of photosynthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No indication of any heterogeneity of photosynthesis was found in any leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1675 · show in text ↑
e2

“three Mediterranean plants (olive, Olea europea L.; rosemary, Rosmarinus officinalis L.; lavender, Lavandula stoechas L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced leaf area across all three species.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae2
Treatment
Drought treatmente0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought treatment significantly decreased leaf area in all species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1743 · show in text ↑
e2

“three Mediterranean plants (olive, Olea europea L.; rosemary, Rosmarinus officinalis L.; lavender, Lavandula stoechas L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated UV-B had no significant effect on growth.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae2
Treatment
elevated UV-B radiation (0.47 W m(-2))e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
no significant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of plants to elevated UV-B radiation (0.47 W m(-2)) prior to and during the drought treatment had no significant effects on the growth or photosynthetic activities of the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1826–2012 · show in text ↑
e2

“three Mediterranean plants (olive, Olea europea L.; rosemary, Rosmarinus officinalis L.; lavender, Lavandula stoechas L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated UV-B had no significant effect on photosynthetic activity.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae2
Treatment
elevated UV-B radiation (0.47 W m(-2))e0
Outcome
photosynthetic activitiese0
Direction
no significant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of plants to elevated UV-B radiation (0.47 W m(-2)) prior to and during the drought treatment had no significant effects on the growth or photosynthetic activities of the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1826–2012 · show in text ↑
e2

“three Mediterranean plants (olive, Olea europea L.; rosemary, Rosmarinus officinalis L.; lavender, Lavandula stoechas L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–185 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ

16 papers: 1 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

uv · physiology: photosynthesis · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

drought · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

19 papers: 0 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.