Paper · 2010 · 2010 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS)

Leaf and canopy cholorophyll content retrieval from hyperspectral remote sensing imagery

Xiguang Yang; Wenyi Fan; Ying Yu

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Chlorophyll content is the essential parameter in photosynthesis determining leaf spectral variation in visible bands. Therefore, the accurate estimation of the forest canopy chlorophyll content is a significant foundation in assessing forest growth and diseases. Hyperspectral remote sensing with high spatial resolution can be used for estimating chlorophyll content. And it is also provided to diagnose and examine chlorophyll spectral characteristics through narrow bands spectral reflection. In this study, the chlorophyll content was retrieved by using Hyperion. Firstly, Hyperion data was processed with smear correction, echo correction, background removal, radiometric correction, bad pixels repair, and image quality checking. Secondly, the canopy reflectance was converted into leaf reflectance by geometrical-optical model 4-scale and look-up table. Following by that, the spectral curve of the leaf was studied and 25 spectral characteristic parameters were identified through the correlation coefficient matrix. Moreover, leaf chlorophyll content inversion model was established by using these parameters through stepwise regression. Finally, leaf chlorophyll content was retrieved, and canopy chlorophyll content per unit ground surface area was estimated based on leaf chlorophyll content and leaf area index. The result indicated that the effect of the leaf chlorophyll content inversion model was very robust, and the precision achieved 88.74%. Leaf chlorophyll content was estimated with R 2 = 0.5735, RMSE = 7.3574 ¿g/cm 2 . An empirical relationship between simple ratio derived from the Hyperion imagery and the ground-measured leaf area index was developed, with R 2 = 0.7947.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The leaf chlorophyll content inversion model reached a precision of 88.74%.

Taxon
forest canopye0
Outcome
precisione1
Value
88.74%e1
Qualifier
very robuste1

Verbatim

e0

“the accurate estimation of the forest canopy chlorophyll content is a significant foundation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–222 · show in text ↑
e1

“The result indicated that the effect of the leaf chlorophyll content inversion model was very robust, and the precision achieved 88.74%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1461 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll content estimated from Hyperion data reached R 2 = 0.5735.

Taxon
forest canopye0
Outcome
R 2e2
Value
0.5735e2
Qualifier
Leaf chlorophyll contente2

Verbatim

e0

“the accurate estimation of the forest canopy chlorophyll content is a significant foundation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–222 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaf chlorophyll content was estimated with R 2 = 0.5735, RMSE = 7.3574 ¿g/cm 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1542 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll content estimated from Hyperion data had an RMSE of 7.3574 ¿g/cm 2.

Taxon
forest canopye0
Outcome
RMSEe2
Value
7.3574 ¿g/cm 2e2
Qualifier
Leaf chlorophyll contente2

Verbatim

e0

“the accurate estimation of the forest canopy chlorophyll content is a significant foundation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–222 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaf chlorophyll content was estimated with R 2 = 0.5735, RMSE = 7.3574 ¿g/cm 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1542 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An empirical relationship between the Hyperion simple ratio and leaf area index reached R 2 = 0.7947.

Taxon
forest canopye0
Outcome
empirical relationship between simple ratio derived from the Hyperion imagery and the ground-measured leaf area indexe3
Value
0.7947e3

Verbatim

e0

“the accurate estimation of the forest canopy chlorophyll content is a significant foundation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–222 · show in text ↑
e3

“An empirical relationship between simple ratio derived from the Hyperion imagery and the ground-measured leaf area index was developed, with R 2 = 0.7947”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1698 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hyperion data yielded 25 spectral characteristic parameters for chlorophyll retrieval.

Taxon
forest canopye0
Outcome
spectral characteristic parameterse4
Value
25e4

Verbatim

e0

“the accurate estimation of the forest canopy chlorophyll content is a significant foundation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–222 · show in text ↑
e4

“25 spectral characteristic parameters were identified through the correlation coefficient matrix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1024 · show in text ↑