Paper · 1992 · Tropical Pest Management

On‐farm evaluation of control strategies for insect pests in cowpea with emphasis on flower thrips,Megalurothrips sjostedtiTrybom (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)

Aliyageen M. Alghali

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A study to evaluate control strategies for insect pests in cowpea with emphasis on flower thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom, was carried out on farms in Dzwafu and Minjibirr villages in Nigeria. Two insecticides, Sherpa Plus and Cymbush Super ED, applied at different cowpea growth stages, were tested. Insect numbers were higher and yields lower in Dzwafu than Minjibirr. Both insecticides were effective and profitable, giving increased yields and marginal returns. Sherpa Plus gave slightly better insect pest control. Applying the insecticides at flowering gave better thrip control and grain yields than application at flower bud formation. Grain yields and profit margins increased when insecticides were applied at both growth stages. However, insecticidal application decreased haulm yields. Spraying at flowering caused the greatest reduction. insect pest control for cowpea grain production thus is antagonistic to haulm production for fodder, which may be the primary requirement in some areas. Therefore, techniques for managing cowpea pests should take farmers’ requirements into account.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect numbers were higher in Dzwafu than in Minjibirr.

Outcome
Insect numberse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
Minjibirre2
Setting
Dzwafue2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study to evaluate control strategies for insect pests in cowpea with emphasis on flower thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom, was carried out on farms in Dzwafu and Minjibirr villages in Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–208 · show in text ↑
e2

“Insect numbers were higher and yields lower in Dzwafu than Minjibirr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–386 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields were lower in Dzwafu than in Minjibirr.

Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
Minjibirre2
Setting
Dzwafue2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study to evaluate control strategies for insect pests in cowpea with emphasis on flower thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom, was carried out on farms in Dzwafu and Minjibirr villages in Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–208 · show in text ↑
e2

“Insect numbers were higher and yields lower in Dzwafu than Minjibirr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both insecticides increased cowpea grain yields and marginal returns.

Treatment
Both insecticidese3
Outcome
yields and marginal returnse3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study to evaluate control strategies for insect pests in cowpea with emphasis on flower thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom, was carried out on farms in Dzwafu and Minjibirr villages in Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–208 · show in text ↑
e3

“Both insecticides were effective and profitable, giving increased yields and marginal returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both insecticides were effective and profitable in cowpea.

Treatment
Both insecticidese3
Outcome
effective and profitablee3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study to evaluate control strategies for insect pests in cowpea with emphasis on flower thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom, was carried out on farms in Dzwafu and Minjibirr villages in Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–208 · show in text ↑
e3

“Both insecticides were effective and profitable, giving increased yields and marginal returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sherpa Plus gave slightly better insect pest control than Cymbush Super ED.

Treatment
Sherpa Pluse4
Outcome
insect pest controle4
Direction
bettere4
Comparator
Cymbush Super EDe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study to evaluate control strategies for insect pests in cowpea with emphasis on flower thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom, was carried out on farms in Dzwafu and Minjibirr villages in Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two insecticides, Sherpa Plus and Cymbush Super ED, applied at different cowpea growth stages, were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–316 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sherpa Plus gave slightly better insect pest control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying insecticides at flowering gave better flower thrip control and grain yields than applying at flower bud formation.

Treatment
Applying the insecticides at floweringe5
Interactor
Megalurothrips sjostedtiMegalurothrips sjostedtie0pest
Outcome
thrip control and grain yieldse5
Direction
bettere5
Comparator
application at flower bud formatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study to evaluate control strategies for insect pests in cowpea with emphasis on flower thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom, was carried out on farms in Dzwafu and Minjibirr villages in Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–208 · show in text ↑
e5

“Applying the insecticides at flowering gave better thrip control and grain yields than application at flower bud formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticides applied at both growth stages increased grain yields and profit margins.

Treatment
insecticides were applied at both growth stagese6
Outcome
Grain yields and profit marginse6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study to evaluate control strategies for insect pests in cowpea with emphasis on flower thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom, was carried out on farms in Dzwafu and Minjibirr villages in Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–208 · show in text ↑
e6

“Grain yields and profit margins increased when insecticides were applied at both growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticidal application decreased cowpea haulm yields.

Treatment
insecticidal applicatione7
Outcome
haulm yieldse7
Direction
decreasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study to evaluate control strategies for insect pests in cowpea with emphasis on flower thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom, was carried out on farms in Dzwafu and Minjibirr villages in Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–208 · show in text ↑
e7

“However, insecticidal application decreased haulm yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying at flowering caused the greatest reduction in haulm yields.

Treatment
Spraying at floweringe1
Outcome
haulm yieldse7
Direction
greatest reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study to evaluate control strategies for insect pests in cowpea with emphasis on flower thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom, was carried out on farms in Dzwafu and Minjibirr villages in Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–208 · show in text ↑
e7

“However, insecticidal application decreased haulm yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–813 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spraying at flowering caused the greatest reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–866 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect pest control for grain production is antagonistic to haulm production for fodder.

Treatment
insect pest controle1
Outcome
haulm production for foddere1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Qualifier
antagonistice1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A study to evaluate control strategies for insect pests in cowpea with emphasis on flower thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom, was carried out on farms in Dzwafu and Minjibirr villages in Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“insect pest control for cowpea grain production thus is antagonistic to haulm production for fodder, which may be the primary requirement in some areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1019 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea pest management techniques should take farmers requirements into account.

Outcome
techniques for managing cowpea pests should take farmers’ requirements into accounte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“techniques for managing cowpea pests should take farmers’ requirements into account”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1115 · show in text ↑

stage · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 18 positive, 8 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

insecticide · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

application · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 112 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 112 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

stage · Megalurothrips sjostedti · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · Megalurothrips sjostedti · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.