Paper · 2003 · Plant Pathology

Evaluating Pochonia chlamydosporia in a double‐cropping system of lettuce and tomato in plastic houses infested with Meloidogyne javanica

S. Verdejo‐Lucas; F. J. Sorribas; C. Ornat; et al.

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
68
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of Pochonia chlamydosporia , a facultative fungal parasite of nematode eggs, alone or in combination with oxamyl was evaluated in a double‐cropping system of lettuce and tomato in unheated plastic houses infested with Meloidogyne javanica at two sites for two consecutive growing seasons. An additional treatment of methyl bromide fumigation was included to compare crop yield in nematode‐free vs. nematode‐infested soil. Final population densities, reproductive rate, root gall rating, and egg production were determined after each crop. Pochonia chlamydosporia was isolated from nematode eggs up to nine months after application to soil. The fungus survived in the rhizosphere for the entire growing season at one site, but only at low densities. Final population densities of M. javanica decreased after cultivation of lettuce and increased after tomato, and this pattern of population fluctuation was unaffected by treatment, experiment or site. The reproductive rate on lettuce was equal to or below 1, and it was similar among treatments in both experiments at both sites. Eggs were not found on lettuce roots. On tomato, the reproductive rate in the fungus + oxamyl treatment was significantly lower ( P < 0·05) than other treatments in experiment 1 at both sites. Fungus + oxamyl consistently reduced root gall ratings on tomato in all cases, but numbers of eggs per g root varied depending on treatment. Methyl bromide‐treated plots remained free of M. javanica at the end of the 2‐year study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pochonia chlamydosporia was isolated from nematode eggs up to nine months after soil application.

Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pest
Second interactor
Pochonia chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Pochonia chlamydosporia was isolated from nematode eggse0
Value
nine monthse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pochonia chlamydosporia was isolated from nematode eggs up to nine months after application to soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–649 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungus survived in the rhizosphere for the full growing season at one site at low density.

Interactor
funguse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fungus survived in the rhizospheree0
Qualifier
only at low densitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungus survived in the rhizosphere for the entire growing season at one site, but only at low densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. javanica final population density decreased after lettuce cultivation.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
Outcome
population densities of M. javanicae0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Final population densities of M. javanica decreased after cultivation of lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–840 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. javanica final population density increased after tomato cultivation.

Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae1peste0
Outcome
population fluctuatione0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased after tomato, and this pattern of population fluctuation was unaffected by treatment, experiment or site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Final population densities of M. javanica decreased after cultivation of lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–840 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nematode population fluctuation pattern did not depend on treatment, experiment or site.

Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae1peste0
Outcome
pattern of population fluctuatione0
Direction
unaffectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this pattern of population fluctuation was unaffected by treatment, experiment or site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of Pochonia chlamydosporia , a facultative fungal parasite of nematode eggs, alone or in combination with oxamyl was evaluated in a double‐cropping system of lettuce and tomato in unheated plastic houses infested with Meloidogyne javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–249 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode reproductive rate on lettuce was at most 1.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Outcome
reproductive ratee0
Direction
equal to or belowe0
Value
1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reproductive rate on lettuce was equal to or below 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode reproductive rate on lettuce was similar among treatments.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
reproductive ratee1
Direction
similare0
Comparator
treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was similar among treatments in both experiments at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The reproductive rate on lettuce was equal to or below 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1017 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No nematode eggs were found on lettuce roots.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
Eggs were not founde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eggs were not found on lettuce roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungus plus oxamyl lowered nematode reproductive rate on tomato relative to other treatments in experiment 1 at both sites.

Treatment
fungus + oxamyl treatmente0
Interactor
funguse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
reproductive ratee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On tomato, the reproductive rate in the fungus + oxamyl treatment was significantly lower ( P < 0·05) than other treatments in experiment 1 at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungus plus oxamyl consistently reduced tomato root gall ratings.

Treatment
Fungus + oxamyle0
Interactor
Funguse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root gall ratingse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungus + oxamyl consistently reduced root gall ratings on tomato in all cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1360 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Egg numbers per gram of root varied by treatment.

Treatment
treatmente0
Outcome
numbers of eggs per g roote0
Direction
variede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“numbers of eggs per g root varied depending on treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl bromide plots remained free of M. javanica after two years.

Treatment
Methyl bromidee0
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
Outcome
free of M. javanicae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Methyl bromide‐treated plots remained free of M. javanica at the end of the 2‐year study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑

oxamyl · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

bromomethane · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.