Paper · 2014 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Nutrient Uptake, Water Relations, and Yield Performance lf Different Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivumL.) under Salinity Stress

Rai Altaf Hussain; Rashid Ahmad; Ejaz Ahmad Waraich; et al.

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted in the wire house of Department of Crop Physiology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad to evaluate the effect of salinity stress on water relations, nutrient uptake and yield of six local spring wheat cultivars. The seeds were sown in plastic pots (25 × 15 cm) and experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design in factorial arrangement with three repeats. De-ionized water was used as control treatment while salinity stress was imposed by irrigating plants with sodium chloride (NaCl) solution of 10 mM at tillering, stem elongation, anthesis, and grain development stages. Results of the study demonstrated that salinity stress decreased water potential by 32%, osmotic potential by 12%, and relative water contents by 20% as compared to control treatment. The nitrogen (N) uptake was decreased by 36% under salinity stress, while phosphorous (P) and potassium (K) uptake were decreased by 56% and 42%, respectively. The yield of wheat plants was also significantly reduced under salinity stress. It reduced grain yield by 25% and grain weight by 7%. The response of different cultivars was also different to salinity stress as cultivars 'Lasani-08' and 'FSD-08' were found to be more tolerant as compared to other cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity lowered wheat water potential by 32%.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
water potentiale0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
32%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“salinity stress decreased water potential by 32%, osmotic potential by 12%, and relative water contents by 20% as compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity lowered wheat osmotic potential by 12%.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
osmotic potentiale0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“salinity stress decreased water potential by 32%, osmotic potential by 12%, and relative water contents by 20% as compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity lowered wheat relative water contents by 20%.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
relative water contentse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“salinity stress decreased water potential by 32%, osmotic potential by 12%, and relative water contents by 20% as compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity lowered nitrogen uptake by 36%.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
nitrogen (N) uptakee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
36%e0
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“nitrogen (N) uptake was decreased by 36% under salinity stress, while phosphorous (P) and potassium (K) uptake were decreased by 56% and 42%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–968 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity lowered phosphorus uptake by 56%.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
phosphorous (P)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
56%e0
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“nitrogen (N) uptake was decreased by 36% under salinity stress, while phosphorous (P) and potassium (K) uptake were decreased by 56% and 42%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–968 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity lowered potassium uptake by 42%.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
potassium (K) uptakee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
42%e0
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“nitrogen (N) uptake was decreased by 36% under salinity stress, while phosphorous (P) and potassium (K) uptake were decreased by 56% and 42%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–968 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced grain yield by 25%.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“The yield of wheat plants was also significantly reduced under salinity stress. It reduced grain yield by 25% and grain weight by 7%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced grain weight by 7%.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7%e0
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“The yield of wheat plants was also significantly reduced under salinity stress. It reduced grain yield by 25% and grain weight by 7%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–807 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lasani-08 and FSD-08 were more salt tolerant than other cultivars.

Material
'Lasani-08' and 'FSD-08'e0
Outcome
more tolerante0
Direction
more tolerante0
Comparator
other cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“cultivars 'Lasani-08' and 'FSD-08' were found to be more tolerant as compared to other cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1276 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

58 papers: 9 positive, 49 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 19 positive, 66 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.