Paper · 1967 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Clonal Differences in Yield Response of Populus deltoides to Nitrogen Fertilization

James W. Curlin

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Trees propagated from cuttings of 22 clones of Populus deltoides were grown under unfertilized and nitrogen‐fertilized conditions. Large increases in growth resulted from fertilization. A strong clone × fertilizer interaction was observed for diameter, height, and volume growth. Wood specific gravity was reduced by fertilization but no interaction between clones and fertilizers was noted for that character after 2 years. The presence of the genotype‐environment interaction indicated that it would be unwise to select eastern cottonwood from a nutritional environment other than the one in which it will ultimately grow. Frequently a clone which performed poorly under unfertilized conditions excelled when fertilized and in several instances the reverse was true. This suggests the possibility that selection can be made specifically for fertilizer response in tree improvement programs. Caution should be exercised when interpreting fertilizer response of experimental populations which might contain genetic bias.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization produced large growth increases in Populus deltoides.

Taxon
Populus deltoidesPopulus deltoidest0
Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus deltoides
Populus deltoides · TaxonR. A. Nonenmacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Large increases in growth resulted from fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–194 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus deltoides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A strong clone-by-fertilizer interaction occurred for diameter, height and volume growth.

Taxon
Populus deltoidesPopulus deltoidest0
Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
diameter, height, and volume growthe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus deltoides
Populus deltoides · TaxonR. A. Nonenmacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A strong clone × fertilizer interaction was observed for diameter, height, and volume growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus deltoides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization reduced wood specific gravity.

Taxon
Populus deltoidesPopulus deltoidest0
Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
Wood specific gravitye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
after 2 yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus deltoides
Populus deltoides · TaxonR. A. Nonenmacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wood specific gravity was reduced by fertilization but no interaction between clones and fertilizers was noted for that character after 2 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–433 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus deltoides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No clone-by-fertilizer interaction was noted for wood specific gravity after two years.

Taxon
Populus deltoidesPopulus deltoidest0
Material
clonese0
Outcome
Wood specific gravitye0
Direction
no interactione0
Qualifier
after 2 yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus deltoides
Populus deltoides · TaxonR. A. Nonenmacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wood specific gravity was reduced by fertilization but no interaction between clones and fertilizers was noted for that character after 2 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–433 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus deltoides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cottonwood should be selected in the nutritional environment in which it will grow.

Taxon
eastern cottonwoode0
Outcome
select eastern cottonwood from a nutritional environment other than the one in which it will ultimately growe0

Verbatim

e0

“it would be unwise to select eastern cottonwood from a nutritional environment other than the one in which it will ultimately grow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clones performing poorly without fertilizer frequently excelled with fertilizer, with the reverse occurring in several instances.

Taxon
Populus deltoidesPopulus deltoidest0
Treatment
fertilizede0
Outcome
excellede0
Direction
excellede0
Comparator
unfertilized conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus deltoides
Populus deltoides · TaxonR. A. Nonenmacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Frequently a clone which performed poorly under unfertilized conditions excelled when fertilized and in several instances the reverse was true.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus deltoides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Selection specifically for fertilizer response may be possible in tree improvement programs.

Taxon
Populus deltoidesPopulus deltoidest0
Outcome
selection can be made specifically for fertilizer responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus deltoides
Populus deltoides · TaxonR. A. Nonenmacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This suggests the possibility that selection can be made specifically for fertilizer response in tree improvement programs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus deltoides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer response in potentially genetically biased experimental populations should be interpreted cautiously.

Taxon
Populus deltoidesPopulus deltoidest0
Outcome
Caution should be exercised when interpreting fertilizer responsee0
Qualifier
experimental populations which might contain genetic biase0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus deltoides
Populus deltoides · TaxonR. A. Nonenmacher · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Caution should be exercised when interpreting fertilizer response of experimental populations which might contain genetic bias.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus deltoides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Populus deltoidesResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.