Paper · 1951 · Canadian Journal of Botany

TOBACCO ETCH VIRUS IN ONTARIO

R. H. Stover

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tobacco etch is one of the most widespread and injurious viruses on burley tobacco in Ontario. Three strains of this virus were obtained from tobacco collections. Their symptoms and behavior on tobacco and other hosts are described. Tobacco varieties were divided into two groups on the basis of their reaction to the etch virus. The group comprising all burley varieties tested showed severe symptoms while the other, comprising flue cured, dark, and cigar varieties, developed mild symptoms. The F 1 from severe-symptom varieties × mild-symptom varieties exhibit mild symptoms while the F 2 has segregated into severe- and mild-symptom types. The widespread occurrence of etch is attributed to the prevalence on tobacco of the vector Myzus persicae. A mixture of potato virus X (ringspot strain) and etch causes a more severe disease on burley tobacco than either virus by itself.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burley varieties showed severe etch symptoms.

Material
burley varietiese0
Outcome
severe symptomse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The group comprising all burley varieties tested showed severe symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–401 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flue cured, dark and cigar varieties had mild symptoms.

Material
flue cured, dark, and cigar varietiese0
Outcome
mild symptomse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the other, comprising flue cured, dark, and cigar varieties, developed mild symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–492 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 offspring showed mild symptoms.

Material
F 1e0
Outcome
mild symptomse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The F 1 from severe-symptom varieties × mild-symptom varieties exhibit mild symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–578 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F2 offspring segregated into severe and mild symptoms.

Material
F 2e0
Outcome
severe- and mild-symptom typese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the F 2 has segregated into severe- and mild-symptom types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Etch and potato virus X together caused more severe disease than either alone.

Treatment
A mixture of potato virus X (ringspot strain) and etche0
Outcome
disease on burley tobaccoe0
Direction
more severee0
Comparator
either virus by itselfe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A mixture of potato virus X (ringspot strain) and etch causes a more severe disease on burley tobacco than either virus by itself.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–882 · show in text ↑

Solanum tuberosum · organism · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.