Paper · 2001 · Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Effect of Population Outcrossing Rate on Inbreeding Depression inPinus contortavar.murrayanaSeedlings

Frank C. Sorensen

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Self and cross families from three populations (A, low-density, ecologically marginal site for lodgepole pine, and B + C, normal sites) were cultured in a common outdoor nursery for 2 yrs. Previous results had shown higher natural selfing rates and lower inbreeding depression in embryo survival in A than in B + C. In the nursery test, selfing decreased means of size traits, retarded phenological development, increased variance among families within populations, increased the coefficient of within-family variance, and increased within-family skewness. The selfing depression of mean values was moderately less and the selfing inflation of within-plot variation was much less in A than in B + C. Results were compatible with the idea that the higher selfing rate in A had purged both severely deleterious alleles affecting embryo survival and severely deleterious alleles affecting later life-cycle traits related to plant size. Purging partially mitigated the genetic consequences associated with increased inbreeding in small populations, but even with purging, population A retained a large inbreeding depression in both embryonic and seedling traits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the nursery test, selfing decreased the means of size traits in lodgepole pine seedlings relative to cross families.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae0
Treatment
selfinge1
Outcome
means of size traitse1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
cross familiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Self and cross families from three populations (A, low-density, ecologically marginal site for lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“selfing decreased means of size traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selfing retarded phenological development in lodgepole pine seedlings relative to cross families.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae0
Treatment
Selfe0
Outcome
phenological developmente1
Direction
retardede1
Comparator
cross familiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Self and cross families from three populations (A, low-density, ecologically marginal site for lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“retarded phenological development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selfing increased variance among families within populations, the coefficient of within-family variance and within-family skewness in lodgepole pine.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae0
Treatment
Selfe0
Outcome
variance among families within populations, increased the coefficient of within-family variance, and increased within-family skewnesse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
cross familiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Self and cross families from three populations (A, low-density, ecologically marginal site for lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased variance among families within populations, increased the coefficient of within-family variance, and increased within-family skewness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selfing depression of mean values was moderately less in population A than in populations B + C.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae0
Treatment
selfinge1
Outcome
selfing depression of mean valuese1
Direction
moderately lesse1
Comparator
B + Ce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Self and cross families from three populations (A, low-density, ecologically marginal site for lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“The selfing depression of mean values was moderately less and the selfing inflation of within-plot variation was much less in A than in B + C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selfing inflation of within-plot variation was much less in population A than in populations B + C.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae0
Treatment
selfinge1
Outcome
selfing inflation of within-plot variatione1
Direction
much lesse1
Comparator
B + Ce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Self and cross families from three populations (A, low-density, ecologically marginal site for lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“The selfing depression of mean values was moderately less and the selfing inflation of within-plot variation was much less in A than in B + C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–698 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The results were compatible with the idea that the higher selfing rate in population A had purged severely deleterious alleles affecting embryo survival and later life-cycle size traits.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae0
Treatment
higher selfing rate in Ae1
Outcome
purged both severely deleterious alleles affecting embryo survivale1
Qualifier
Results were compatible with the ideae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Self and cross families from three populations (A, low-density, ecologically marginal site for lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results were compatible with the idea that the higher selfing rate in A had purged both severely deleterious alleles affecting embryo survival and severely deleterious alleles affecting later life-cycle traits related to plant size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–931 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Even with purging, population A retained a large inbreeding depression in both embryonic and seedling traits.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae0
Material
population Ae1
Outcome
large inbreeding depression in both embryonic and seedling traitse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Self and cross families from three populations (A, low-density, ecologically marginal site for lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“population A retained a large inbreeding depression in both embryonic and seedling traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1157 · show in text ↑