Paper · 2012 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Sugar beet yield as affected by seed priming and weed control

Amir Houshang Jalali; Foroud Salehi

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
26
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Laboratory and field experiments were conducted to determine the influence of different priming techniques on the germination characteristics and competition of weeds in sugar beet in 2008–2009. Three priming times and four priming methods were used in a laboratory study, and four priming treatments and four redroot pigweed densities (0, 4, 8 and 12 plants m−2) were used in a field study. Sugar beet seeds were treated with polyethylene glycol (PEG 8000), NaCl (1.5 N) and HCl (0.1 N) for 2, 4 and 6 h. Seed characteristics were significantly affected by HCl (0.1 N) treatment for 6 h. In this treatment, the germination percentage was 25 and 9% higher than control and NaCl (1.5 N) treatments after a similar time. An intermediate and low effect has been shown with NaCl (1.5 N) and PEG 8000 seed priming, respectively. Sugar beet root yield was reduced by 13, 54 and 89% compared with control treatment (without weed) at redroot pigweed densities of 4, 8 and 12 plants m−2, respectively. Sugar beet seeds primed with HCl (0.1 N) for 6 h gave a higher root yield than unprimed seeeds and the other primed seeds treatments. Overall, the results showed that weed control can significantly increase sugar beet yield and the seed priming technique can be used for weed control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HCl priming significantly affected seed characteristics.

Treatment
HCl (0.1 N) treatment for 6 he0
Outcome
Seed characteristicse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed characteristics were significantly affected by HCl (0.1 N) treatment for 6 h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HCl priming raised germination 25% above control.

Treatment
HCl (0.1 N) treatment for 6 he1
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
highere0
Value
25e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the germination percentage was 25 and 9% higher than control and NaCl (1.5 N) treatments after a similar time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–718 · show in text ↑
e1

“HCl (0.1 N) treatment for 6 h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HCl priming raised germination 9% above NaCl priming.

Treatment
HCl (0.1 N) treatment for 6 he1
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
highere0
Value
9%e0
Comparator
NaCl (1.5 N) treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the germination percentage was 25 and 9% higher than control and NaCl (1.5 N) treatments after a similar time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–718 · show in text ↑
e1

“HCl (0.1 N) treatment for 6 h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl priming had an intermediate effect.

Treatment
NaCl (1.5 N)e0
Outcome
intermediatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An intermediate and low effect has been shown with NaCl (1.5 N) and PEG 8000 seed priming, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG priming had a low effect.

Treatment
PEG 8000 seed priminge0
Outcome
low effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An intermediate and low effect has been shown with NaCl (1.5 N) and PEG 8000 seed priming, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At four pigweed plants per square meter, beet root yield fell 13%.

Treatment
redroot pigweed densities of 4, 8 and 12 plants m−2e0
Interactor
redroot pigweede0weed
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
13e0
Comparator
control treatment (without weed)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet root yield was reduced by 13, 54 and 89% compared with control treatment (without weed) at redroot pigweed densities of 4, 8 and 12 plants m−2, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At eight pigweed plants per square meter, beet root yield fell 54%.

Treatment
redroot pigweed densities of 4, 8 and 12 plants m−2e0
Interactor
redroot pigweede0weed
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
54e0
Comparator
control treatment (without weed)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet root yield was reduced by 13, 54 and 89% compared with control treatment (without weed) at redroot pigweed densities of 4, 8 and 12 plants m−2, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At twelve pigweed plants per square meter, beet root yield fell 89%.

Treatment
redroot pigweed densities of 4, 8 and 12 plants m−2e0
Interactor
redroot pigweede0weed
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
89%e0
Comparator
control treatment (without weed)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet root yield was reduced by 13, 54 and 89% compared with control treatment (without weed) at redroot pigweed densities of 4, 8 and 12 plants m−2, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HCl priming increased root yield versus unprimed and other primed seeds.

Treatment
primed with HCl (0.1 N) for 6 he0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unprimed seeeds and the other primed seeds treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet seeds primed with HCl (0.1 N) for 6 h gave a higher root yield than unprimed seeeds and the other primed seeds treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1126 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude weed control can increase beet yield.

Outcome
weed control can significantly increase sugar beet yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed control can significantly increase sugar beet yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1216 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.