Paper · 2004 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Tillage impacts on organic matter and plant nutrients in a loam soil of dryland in Turkey

A Ali Işildar; A Kamil Bayhan; İbrahim Erdal; et al.

3
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tillage operations for different soils, sites and agroclimatic conditions can show different effects. We have studied for 3 years (2001-2003) the effects of three tillage systems on soil organic matter (OM) and nutrition of crops, in (Helianthus annuus L.) - barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) - Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz)+triticale mixture rotation, established in a loam soil (typic Xerofluvent) of passage zone between coastal belt and the continental climate of Central Anatolia in Turkey. Tillage treatments were chisel ploughing (C); chisel ploughing+ disc harrowing (CD) and chisel ploughing+combine harrowing (CH). Crops were not fertilized. Soil samples taken from 0-20 cm depths at four different periods of the experiment were used for OM and available nutrients (P, K, Fe, Zn). Plant nutrient analysis (N, P, K, Fe, Zn) were conducted on sunflower and Hungarian vetch+triticale samples at harvesting. In tillage treatments, there were no significant differences either for OM and available nutrients in soil depth studied nor nutrient contents of plants. Accordingly nutrient uptakes of plants depend on OM and available nutrient contents of soil, it seems that the mineralization rate of OM was lower in C treatment. It is concluded that the lack of clear differences could be associated with low OM content in relation to xeric soil moisture regime of experimental soil and the short-term of the experiment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three tillage systems did not significantly differ in organic matter, available nutrients or plant nutrient contents.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse2
Treatment
tillage treatmentse1
Outcome
OM and available nutrientse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
nutrient contents of plantse1
Comparator
chisel ploughing (C)e3
Setting
Central Anatolia in Turkeye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In tillage treatments, there were no significant differences either for OM and available nutrients in soil depth studied nor nutrient contents of plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1072 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plant nutrient analysis (N, P, K, Fe, Zn) were conducted on sunflower and Hungarian vetch+triticale samples at harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–918 · show in text ↑
e3

“Tillage treatments were chisel ploughing (C); chisel ploughing+ disc harrowing (CD) and chisel ploughing+combine harrowing (CH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–628 · show in text ↑
e4

“established in a loam soil (typic Xerofluvent) of passage zone between coastal belt and the continental climate of Central Anatolia in Turkey”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–499 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mineralization rate of organic matter seems lower under chisel ploughing (C) than under the other tillage systems (author interpretation).

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse2
Treatment
C treatmente5
Outcome
mineralization rate of OMe5
Direction
lowere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“it seems that the mineralization rate of OM was lower in C treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1235 · show in text ↑
e3

“Tillage treatments were chisel ploughing (C); chisel ploughing+ disc harrowing (CD) and chisel ploughing+combine harrowing (CH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–628 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plant nutrient analysis (N, P, K, Fe, Zn) were conducted on sunflower and Hungarian vetch+triticale samples at harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–918 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant nutrient uptake depends on soil organic matter and available nutrient contents (author interpretation).

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse2
Compound
OM and available nutrient contents of soile6
Outcome
nutrient uptakes of plantse6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Accordingly nutrient uptakes of plants depend on OM and available nutrient contents of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1165 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plant nutrient analysis (N, P, K, Fe, Zn) were conducted on sunflower and Hungarian vetch+triticale samples at harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–918 · show in text ↑

tillage · nutrient: content · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.