Paper · 1980 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Influence of flooding on the availability of soil zinc

V. Pavanasasivam; J. H. Axley

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A soil incubation study and a greenhouse experiment with rice, grown on an Othello silt loam, showed that at high pH, in the presence of supplemented SO4‐S, flooding the soil reduced the availability of Zn. However, when SO4‐S was not added to the soil, flooding the same high pH soil increased the Zn availability. At low pH, on the other hand, irrespective of SO4‐S addition, flooding always caused a reduction in the availability of Zn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding reduced zinc availability at high pH with supplemented sulfate.

Treatment
floodinge0
Outcome
availability of Zne0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
high pH, in the presence of supplemented SO4‐Se0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at high pH, in the presence of supplemented SO4‐S, flooding the soil reduced the availability of Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–215 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse experiment with rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding increased zinc availability at high pH without added sulfate.

Treatment
floodinge0
Outcome
Zn availabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
SO4‐S was not added to the soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when SO4‐S was not added to the soil, flooding the same high pH soil increased the Zn availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–324 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse experiment with rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding reduced zinc availability at low pH regardless of sulfate addition.

Treatment
floodinge0
Outcome
availability of Zne0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
low pH, on the other hand, irrespective of SO4‐S additione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At low pH, on the other hand, irrespective of SO4‐S addition, flooding always caused a reduction in the availability of Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–448 · show in text ↑
t0

“greenhouse experiment with rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–70 · show in text ↑

flooding · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 42 positive, 30 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
    Rice zinc uptake was higher under flooded than upland conditions.

    Response of Several Rice Cultivars to Zn1 · 1974 · compared with upland soil conditions

    Same directionCited by this paper

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.