Paper · 1971 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Effects of S, N and P on amino acid composition of field beans (Vidafabd) and responses of the biological value of the seed protein to S‐amino acid content

W. H. Eppendorfer

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
46
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In pot experiments dry matter yield of seed of Vicia faba was increased by increasing application of S at all N‐ and P‐levels and, by P at all S‐ and N‐levels. Significant interactions were found for PxN (0.1%) and SxP (1%). N‐concentrations generally increased with S‐additions, but decreased with large applications of N and P. Significant interactions were found for PxN fl‐1%) and SxP (5%) with regard to N concentration. Maximum increases in cystine and methionine contents from S‐application were respectively 39.1 and 13.7% expressed as % of dry matter and 37.9 and 12.3% expressed as g/16 g N. Highly significant correlation coefficients were obtained between concentrations (g/16 gN) ofa number of protein am/no acids in seeds and total‐N content. In a feeding trial with rats, the biological value of non‐S treated seed was 40.8 and increased to about 60 in seed from S‐treatments Addition of synthetic cystine and methionine to seed from the non‐S treatment could not entirely substitute these acids present in the protein of seed from S‐treatments with regard to effects on the biological value of seed protein.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing S increased Vicia faba seed dry matter yield at every N and P level.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae0
Treatment
increasing application of Se0
Outcome
dry matter yield of seede0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at all N‐ and P‐levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter yield of seed of Vicia faba was increased by increasing application of S at all N‐ and P‐levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application increased seed dry matter yield at every S and N level.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
dry matter yield of seede1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
at all S‐ and N‐levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by P at all S‐ and N‐levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry matter yield of seed of Vicia faba was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–80 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield had significant P by N and S by P interactions.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Treatment
PxNe0
Outcome
dry matter yield of seede1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant interactions were found for PxN (0.1%) and SxP (1%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–233 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry matter yield of seed of Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S additions generally increased seed N concentration.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Treatment
S‐additionse0
Outcome
N‐concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N‐concentrations generally increased with S‐additions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–287 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large N and P applications decreased N concentration.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae2
Treatment
large applications of N and Pe0
Outcome
N‐concentrationse1
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased with large applications of N and P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–337 · show in text ↑
e1

“N‐concentrations generally increased with S‐additions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–287 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N concentration had significant P by N and S by P interactions.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Treatment
PxNe0
Outcome
N concentratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant interactions were found for PxN fl‐1%) and SxP (5%) with regard to N concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–434 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application increased seed cystine content by up to 39.1% of dry matter.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Treatment
S‐applicatione0
Outcome
cystinee0
Direction
increasese0
Value
39.1e0
Qualifier
% of dry mattere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum increases in cystine and methionine contents from S‐application were respectively 39.1 and 13.7% expressed as % of dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–568 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application increased seed methionine content by up to 13.7% of dry matter.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Treatment
S‐applicatione0
Outcome
methioninee0
Direction
increasese0
Value
13.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum increases in cystine and methionine contents from S‐application were respectively 39.1 and 13.7% expressed as % of dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–568 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application increased cystine by up to 37.9% when expressed as g/16 g N.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae2
Treatment
S‐applicatione1
Outcome
cystinee1
Direction
increasese1
Value
37.9e0
Qualifier
g/16 g Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“37.9 and 12.3% expressed as g/16 g N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–609 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum increases in cystine and methionine contents from S‐application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–506 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application increased methionine by up to 12.3% when expressed as g/16 g N.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae2
Treatment
S‐applicatione1
Outcome
methioninee1
Direction
increasese1
Value
12.3%e0
Qualifier
g/16 g Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“37.9 and 12.3% expressed as g/16 g N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–609 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum increases in cystine and methionine contents from S‐application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–506 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed protein amino acid concentrations correlated significantly with total N content.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Compound
total‐Ne0
Outcome
concentrations (g/16 gN) ofa number of protein am/no acids in seedse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highly significant correlation coefficients were obtained between concentrations (g/16 gN) ofa number of protein am/no acids in seeds and total‐N content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–765 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed from S treatments had a biological value of about 60 compared with 40.8 without S.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Treatment
S‐treatmentse0
Outcome
biological valuee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
about 60e0
Qualifier
40.8e0
Comparator
non‐S treated seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological value of non‐S treated seed was 40.8 and increased to about 60 in seed from S‐treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–899 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding synthetic cystine and methionine to untreated seed did not fully substitute for amino acids incorporated through S treatment in biological value.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabae1
Treatment
Addition of synthetic cystine and methioninee0
Outcome
biological value of seed proteine0
Direction
could not entirely substitutee0
Comparator
seed from S‐treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of synthetic cystine and methionine to seed from the non‐S treatment could not entirely substitute these acids present in the protein of seed from S‐treatments with regard to effects on the biological value of seed protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1132 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑

methionine · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 63 positive, 5 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.