Paper · 2004 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Evaluation of Nutritional Status of the Cotton Plant with Respect to Nitrogen

E. Malavolta; N. G. L. Nogueira; R. Heinrichs; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
43
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Cotton plants, Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Antares, were grown in nutrient solution, under three levels of nitrogen (N) supply, in order to assess their effects on growth and yield, and to evaluate the N status by the following methods: visual symptoms, changes in the leaf ultrastructure, direct and indirect determinations of leaf chlorophyll (SPAD readings); NO3-N in the petiole both, by spot test in vivo and by quantitative determination; total N in the leaf blade and nitrate reductase activity (NO3 R) in the same; total N in the seeds. Low N level in the solution drastically reduced vegetative growth components, number of bolls and seed cotton and fiber yields. Nitrogen deficiency caused yellowing of the leaves beginning in the older ones. The main changes in the ultrastructure of the N deficient leaves were the disruption of the chloroplast membrane and the accumulation of starch granules and lipid globules. The semiquantitative assessment of nitrate in the petiole was unable to differentiate between the upper levels of nitrogen supply, this being also the case for seed N. Nitrogen status was well correlated both with the quantitative determination of NO3-N and with the NO3 R activity. Both direct and indirect determinations of leaf chlorophyll (SPAD readings) were able to reflect the N status, showing significant correlation with yield. Keywords: CottonNitrogenNutritional status

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N reduced vegetative growth components and number of bolls.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Material
cv. Antarese0
Treatment
Low N level in the solutione1
Outcome
vegetative growth components, number of bollse1
Direction
reducede1
Setting
nutrient solutione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton plants, Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Antares, were grown in nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“Low N level in the solution drastically reduced vegetative growth components, number of bolls and seed cotton and fiber yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N reduced seed cotton and fiber yields.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Material
cv. Antarese0
Treatment
Low N level in the solutione1
Outcome
seed cotton and fiber yieldse1
Direction
reducede1
Setting
nutrient solutione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton plants, Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Antares, were grown in nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“Low N level in the solution drastically reduced vegetative growth components, number of bolls and seed cotton and fiber yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen deficiency caused yellowing of the leaves, beginning in the older ones.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Material
cv. Antarese0
Organ / stage
the leavese2
Treatment
Nitrogen deficiencye2
Outcome
yellowing of the leavese2
Setting
nutrient solutione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton plants, Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Antares, were grown in nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–90 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nitrogen deficiency caused yellowing of the leaves beginning in the older ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–758 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N deficient leaves showed changes in ultrastructure, with disrupted chloroplast membranes and accumulated starch granules and lipid globules.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Organ / stage
leavese3
Treatment
N deficiente3
Outcome
changes in the ultrastructuree3
Qualifier
disruption of the chloroplast membrane and the accumulation of starch granules and lipid globulese3
Setting
nutrient solutione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton plants, Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Antares, were grown in nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–90 · show in text ↑
e3

“The main changes in the ultrastructure of the N deficient leaves were the disruption of the chloroplast membrane and the accumulation of starch granules and lipid globules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–931 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Semiquantitative assessment of nitrate in the petiole could not differentiate between upper N levels, and seed N likewise.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Organ / stage
petiolee4
Outcome
The semiquantitative assessment of nitrate in the petiolee4
Qualifier
this being also the case for seed Ne5
Comparator
upper levels of nitrogen supplye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton plants, Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Antares, were grown in nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–90 · show in text ↑
e4

“The semiquantitative assessment of nitrate in the petiole was unable to differentiate between the upper levels of nitrogen supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1062 · show in text ↑
e5

“this being also the case for seed N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1099 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen status was well correlated with the quantitative determination of NO3-N and with NO3 R activity.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Outcome
Nitrogen statuse6
Qualifier
the quantitative determination of NO3-N and with the NO3 R activitye6
Setting
nutrient solutione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton plants, Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Antares, were grown in nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–90 · show in text ↑
e6

“Nitrogen status was well correlated both with the quantitative determination of NO3-N and with the NO3 R activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1214 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct and indirect determinations of leaf chlorophyll (SPAD readings) were able to reflect N status.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Organ / stage
leafe7
Outcome
N statuse7
Qualifier
direct and indirect determinationse7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton plants, Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Antares, were grown in nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–90 · show in text ↑
e7

“Both direct and indirect determinations of leaf chlorophyll (SPAD readings) were able to reflect the N status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1325 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll (SPAD readings) showed significant correlation with yield.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Organ / stage
leafe7
Outcome
yielde2
Qualifier
SPAD readingse7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton plants, Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Antares, were grown in nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–90 · show in text ↑
e7

“Both direct and indirect determinations of leaf chlorophyll (SPAD readings) were able to reflect the N status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1325 · show in text ↑
e2

“showing significant correlation with yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1369 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

103 papers: 65 positive, 38 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

nitrogen · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 286 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.