Paper · 2012 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Yield and quality of tomato grown under organic and conventional nutrient management

Kanu Murmu; Bijoy Chandra Ghosh; Dillip Kumar Swain

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nutrient management plays an important role in yield and quality of tomatoes. A field experiment was conducted during the years 2008–09 and 2009–10 to analyze the effect of organic and conventional sources of fertilizer on yield and quality of tomatoes in an acid lateritic soil of India. The organic sources of fertilizer were vermicompost (VC), crop residue (CR), vermiwash (VW) and biofertilizer (BF). The conventional input was chemical fertilizer (CF) applied at recommended dose of 100:80:60 kg ha−1 of N:P2O5:K2O for the tomato. The organic source VC was used to supply 100% N recommendation as single source or 50% N recommendation when combined with CF or organic sources. Maximum fruit yield was recorded when CF was applied at full dose, which was on a par with VC at full recommendation. A higher percentage of large-size fruits (>7 cm) was obtained in VC-based treatments compared with CF treatment. Vermicompost at full dose increased ascorbic acid, beta carotene, total soluble solids and color value compared with its half dose along with other organic sources (CR, BF). The potential exists to improve tomato fruit quality through a better nutrient management, whether it be conventional, organic or a combination of both.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer applied at full dose gave the maximum fruit yield, compared with vermicompost at full recommendation.

Treatment
CF was applied at full dosee1
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
Maximume1
Comparator
VC at full recommendatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum fruit yield was recorded when CF was applied at full dose, which was on a par with VC at full recommendation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at full recommendation gave fruit yield on a par with chemical fertilizer at full dose.

Treatment
VC at full recommendatione1
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
on a pare1
Comparator
CF was applied at full dosee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum fruit yield was recorded when CF was applied at full dose, which was on a par with VC at full recommendation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VC-based treatments gave a higher percentage of large-size fruits (>7 cm) than the CF treatment.

Treatment
VC-based treatmentse2
Outcome
percentage of large-size fruits (>7 cm)e2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
CF treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e2

“A higher percentage of large-size fruits (>7 cm) was obtained in VC-based treatments compared with CF treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at full dose increased ascorbic acid, beta carotene and total soluble solids compared with its half dose.

Treatment
Vermicompost at full dosee3
Outcome
ascorbic acid, beta carotene, total soluble solidse3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
its half dosee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e3

“Vermicompost at full dose increased ascorbic acid, beta carotene, total soluble solids and color value compared with its half dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost at full dose increased colour value compared with its half dose.

Treatment
Vermicompost at full dosee3
Outcome
color valuee3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
its half dosee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e3

“Vermicompost at full dose increased ascorbic acid, beta carotene, total soluble solids and color value compared with its half dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1043 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit quality can be improved through better nutrient management.

Outcome
improve tomato fruit qualitye4
Qualifier
through a better nutrient managemente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e4

“The potential exists to improve tomato fruit quality through a better nutrient management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1176 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 90 positive, 21 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 129 positive, 15 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.