Paper · 1979 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Influence of Weed Growth and Tillage Interval During Fallow on Water Storage, Soil Nitrates, and Yield

D. E. Lavake; A. F. Wiese

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In an effort to minimize tillage operations and production costs five sweep tillage intervals were evaluated for 7 years during the two 11‐month fallow periods in a winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. ‘Tascosa’)‐sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) cropping sequence. The tillage intervals ranged from very short or once every 2 weeks to as long as 24 days after weed emergence. Their effect on soil water storage, soil NO 3 ‐N level and crop yield were determined on Pullman clay loam in the Southern Great Plains. Delaying tillage for 17 and 24 days after weed emergence reduced available soil water in the top 120 cm of soil. Average NO a ‐N content in the top 120 cm of soil decreased from over 185 kg/ha with sweep tillage at 2‐week intervals to 56 kg/ha when sweep tillage was delayed until 24 days after weed emergence. Average wheat yields were not reduced when sweep tillage was performed 17 days after weed emergence, however they were reduced when tillage was delayed until 24 days after weed emergence. Average sorghum yields were not reduced when tillage was delayed 10 days after weed emergence. Delaying tillage to 17 days after weed emergence cut sorghum yield. Most farmers till about 4 to 10 days after weed emergence. Delaying tillage as much as possible as indicated in this trial will eliminate on or two tillage operations in an 11‐month fallow period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage delayed 17 or 24 days reduced available soil water.

Treatment
Delaying tillage for 17 and 24 days after weed emergencee0
Outcome
available soil watere0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying tillage for 17 and 24 days after weed emergence reduced available soil water in the top 120 cm of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrate fell from over 185 to 56 kg/ha when tillage was delayed 24 days.

Treatment
sweep tillage was delayed until 24 days after weed emergencee0
Outcome
Average NO a ‐N contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
56 kg/hae0
Qualifier
over 185 kg/hae0
Comparator
sweep tillage at 2‐week intervalse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Average NO a ‐N content in the top 120 cm of soil decreased from over 185 kg/ha with sweep tillage at 2‐week intervals to 56 kg/ha when sweep tillage was delayed until 24 days after weed emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield was not reduced by tillage at 17 days.

Treatment
sweep tillage was performed 17 days after weed emergencee0
Outcome
wheat yieldse0
Direction
not reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average wheat yields were not reduced when sweep tillage was performed 17 days after weed emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum yield was not reduced by tillage delayed 10 days.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
tillage was delayed 10 days after weed emergencee0
Outcome
sorghum yieldse0
Direction
not reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average sorghum yields were not reduced when tillage was delayed 10 days after weed emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum yield fell with tillage delayed 17 days.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Delaying tillage to 17 days after weed emergencee0
Outcome
sorghum yielde0
Direction
cute0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying tillage to 17 days after weed emergence cut sorghum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1187 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 102 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.