Paper · 1979 · Agronomy Journal

Influence of Slope Position on Nitrogen Fixation and Yield of Dry Peas1

R. L. Mahler; D. F. Bezdicek; R. E. Witters

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Slope position and aspect are known to influence soil temperature and moisture which have a direct bearing on yield of agronomic crops. The objectives of this study were to determine the influence of soil slope on yield and N 2 fixation by dry peas ( Pisum sativum L.) in the field and to determine the effectiveness of isolates of Rhizobium leguminosarum taken from various slopes on N 2 fixation by peas in the greenhouse. From N 2 (C 2 H 2 )‐fixation rates conducted weekly in three positions of a Palouse catena; bottomland (Xeric Argialbolls) south slope, (Ultic Argixerolls), and ridgetop (Pachic Haploxerolls), total seasonal N 2 (C 2 H 2 ) fixed was estimated at 69, 22, and 17 kg/ha of N, respectively. For peas growing on the bottomland, south slope and ridgetop, plant N uptake was 210, 99, and 75 kg/ha of N, respectively. Pea seed yields of 2,106, and 480 kg/ha on the bottomland and ridgetop, respectively, were related to the amount of water depleted in the soil profile of 21.6 and 8.9 cm, respectively. Higher yield and greater N 2 fixation by peas growing on the bottom slope were apparently related to greater root penetration and removal of water. Greater plant N and dry matter were obtained in the greenhouse when peas were inoculated with isolates from the north slope when compared with isolates from other slopes. No differences were noted in pea growth and N 2 fixation between isolates from the bottomland, south slope and ridgetop, which suggested that differences in N 2 fixation and yield observed in the field were not related to efficiency of the microsymbiot

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal nitrogen fixation in peas was estimated at 69, 22 and 17 kg/ha of N on bottomland, south slope and ridgetop, respectively.

Outcome
total seasonal N 2 (C 2 H 2 ) fixede0
Value
69, 22, and 17 kg/ha of Ne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total seasonal N 2 (C 2 H 2 ) fixed was estimated at 69, 22, and 17 kg/ha of N, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Peas1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–71 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rhizobium leguminosarum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–364 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea nitrogen uptake was 210, 99 and 75 kg/ha of N on bottomland, south slope and ridgetop.

Outcome
plant N uptakee0
Value
210, 99, and 75 kg/ha of Ne0
Setting
bottomland, south slope and ridgetope0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For peas growing on the bottomland, south slope and ridgetop, plant N uptake was 210, 99, and 75 kg/ha of N, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–842 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea seed yield was 2,106 kg/ha on bottomland versus 480 kg/ha on ridgetop and was related to soil water depletion.

Outcome
Pea seed yieldse0
Value
2,106, and 480 kg/hae0
Qualifier
amount of water depleted in the soil profile of 21.6 and 8.9 cme0
Setting
bottomland and ridgetope0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pea seed yields of 2,106, and 480 kg/ha on the bottomland and ridgetop, respectively, were related to the amount of water depleted in the soil profile of 21.6 and 8.9 cm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1027 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher yield and nitrogen fixation on the bottom slope were apparently related to greater root penetration and water removal.

Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
Higher yield and greater N 2 fixatione0
Direction
Highere0
Qualifier
apparently related to greater root penetration and removal of watere0
Setting
bottom slopee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher yield and greater N 2 fixation by peas growing on the bottom slope were apparently related to greater root penetration and removal of water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

North-slope rhizobial isolates produced greater pea nitrogen and dry matter than isolates from other slopes.

Treatment
inoculated with isolates from the north slopee0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarumt1symbiont
Outcome
plant N and dry mattere0
Direction
Greatere0
Comparator
isolates from other slopese0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater plant N and dry matter were obtained in the greenhouse when peas were inoculated with isolates from the north slope when compared with isolates from other slopes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Peas1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–71 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rhizobium leguminosarum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea growth and nitrogen fixation did not differ among bottomland, south-slope and ridgetop rhizobial isolates.

Treatment
isolates from the bottomland, south slope and ridgetope0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarumt1symbiont
Outcome
pea growth and N 2 fixatione0
Direction
No differencese0
Comparator
isolates from the bottomland, south slope and ridgetope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences were noted in pea growth and N 2 fixation between isolates from the bottomland, south slope and ridgetop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Peas1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–71 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rhizobium leguminosarum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–364 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Rhizobium leguminosarum · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.