Paper · 2010 · American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Effects of Machine-Induced Soil Compaction on Growth and Yield of Sugarcane

Usaborisut

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
17
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Problem statement: Sugarcane is one of the main economic crops in Thailand. After planting, it can be harvested annually for several successive ratoon crops. Recently, soil compaction due to mechanization has been recognized as a serious problem in sugarcane production. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the effects of soil compaction on the growth and yield of sugarcane. Approach: The field experiments were conducted in loamy soil using a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with four treatments of soil compaction prepared by 0, 5, 15 and 20 numbers of wheel passages of a tractor. Results: The results showed that soil compaction had significant effects on both the growth and yield of sugarcane, with the exceptions of tillering and Brix. The greatest reduction in yield compared with the control field was 22.9%, which resulted from compacting with 15 tractor passages. The influence of block or furrow irrigation was indicated by the positive effect that higher watering had on minimizing the impact of soil compaction on the growth of sugarcane. Conclusion: Effects of soil compaction on growth and yield of sugarcane were clarified to some extent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil compaction significantly affected sugarcane growth.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
soil compactione0
Outcome
growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“soil compaction had significant effects on both the growth and yield of sugarcane, with the exceptions of tillering and Brix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil compaction significantly affected sugarcane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
soil compactione0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“soil compaction had significant effects on both the growth and yield of sugarcane, with the exceptions of tillering and Brix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil compaction did not significantly affect sugarcane tillering.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
soil compactione0
Outcome
tilleringe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“soil compaction had significant effects on both the growth and yield of sugarcane, with the exceptions of tillering and Brix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil compaction did not significantly affect sugarcane Brix.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
soil compactione0
Outcome
Brixe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“soil compaction had significant effects on both the growth and yield of sugarcane, with the exceptions of tillering and Brix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifteen tractor passages produced the greatest sugarcane yield reduction, 22.9% versus control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
15 tractor passagese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
22.9%e0
Comparator
control fielde0

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest reduction in yield compared with the control field was 22.9%, which resulted from compacting with 15 tractor passages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher irrigation mitigated the impact of soil compaction on sugarcane growth.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
higher wateringe0
Outcome
impact of soil compaction on the growthe0
Direction
minimizinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“higher watering had on minimizing the impact of soil compaction on the growth of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

tillage · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

tillage · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 35 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

irrigation · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 47 positive, 7 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.