Paper · 2013 · Plant Disease

First Report of Pseudocercospora angolensis Causing Fruit and Leaf Spot of Citrus in Ghana

F. C. Brentu; E. W. Cornelius; L. E. V. Lawson; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Citrus is one of the most important crops in Ghana, representing a large proportion of the fresh fruit consumed in the country. In 2004, symptoms consisting of necrotic leaf spots of about 1 cm in diameter with light brown centers and dark brown margins surrounded by a yellow halo were first observed in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) and mandarin (C. reticulata) orchards in the Eastern Region of Ghana. Fruits with raised corky lesions of up to 3 to 4 cm in diameter with yellow halos were also observed. Affected fruit had longitudinal and transversal cracks in the rind with the internal locules exposed. Juice content in diseased fruit was strongly reduced, making them unsuitable for fresh consumption or processing. The disease expanded to the Central and Ashanti Regions, with incidences over 95% and estimated yield losses of about 50 to 90%. Symptomatic leaves and fruit collected in Kade in the Eastern Region were surface disinfested with 0.5% NaOCl for 5 min and small fragments from lesions were plated onto malt extract agar (MEA). Slow-growing fungal colonies were isolated from about 5% of the affected tissues plated after 5 days of incubation at 24 to 26°C, and were transferred to V-8 juice agar and MEA. Plates were incubated for 30 days at 24 to 26°C with 12 h of fluorescent light and 12 h of dark for morphological examination. Colonies were gray in the upper side and dark green on the underside. Conidia produced in culture were mostly solitary or in short chains of 2 to 6 spores, hyaline to pale brown, cylindrical, with rounded apex and base truncated. Conidia were 24 to 82 × 4 to 6 μm, with up to 3 to 5 transverse septa and no longisepta. The 5.8S, ITS2, and 28S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) regions were amplified using the primers ITS1 and ITS4 (3) and sequenced from DNA extracted from the isolate MC-39, obtained from sweet orange leaves in Kade (GenBank Accession No. KF111755). The sequence had 99% identity (total score 819, 85% coverage) with that of Pseudocercospora angolensis (T. Carvalho & O. Mendes) Crous & U. Braun epitype strain CBS 112933 (GU269836) (1). Pathogenicity tests were performed twice on 12-week-old detached fruit of sweet orange cv. Valencia Late of about 4 to 5 cm in diameter. Inoculations were performed using a conidial suspension (3.0 × 10 5 conidia/ml water) by spraying fruit to run off, brushing the rind, dipping for 6 min, or injecting 2 ml in the albedo. Twenty-two isolates were evaluated and 18 fruit were used for each inoculation technique, isolate and experiment. Fruit treated with sterile distilled water were used as controls. Inoculated fruit were maintained in humid chambers at 24 to 26°C. Disease incidence on inoculated fruit varied from 40.7% to 92.6% and severity from 2 to 3 to 3 to 11 lesions per fruit, depending on the isolate and inoculation technique. No symptoms were observed on control fruit. Fungal colonies morphologically identified as P. angolensis were reisolated from lesions on inoculated fruit, but not from asymptomatic control fruit. Based on these results, the disease was identified as Pseudocercospora fruit and leaf spot of citrus caused by P. angolensis. Until this present report, Ghana was considered one of the few countries in Central Africa that was still free of this citrus disease (2). References: (1) P. W. Crous et al. Stud. Mycol. 75:37, 2013. (2) A. A. Seif and R. J. Hillocks. Int. J. Pest Manag. 39:44, 1993. (3) T. J. White et al. Pages 315-322 in: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, 1990.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet orange and mandarin orchards had necrotic leaf spots in eastern Ghana.

Taxon
sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) and mandarin (C. reticulata)Citrus sinensisCitrus reticulatae0
Outcome
necrotic leaf spotse0
Value
about 1 cme0
Setting
Eastern Region of Ghanae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“necrotic leaf spots of about 1 cm in diameter with light brown centers and dark brown margins surrounded by a yellow halo were first observed in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) and mandarin (C. reticulata) orchards in the Eastern Region of Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–404 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Affected citrus fruit had raised corky lesions and rind cracks.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
raised corky lesionse0
Value
up to 3 to 4 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits with raised corky lesions of up to 3 to 4 cm in diameter with yellow halos were also observed. Affected fruit had longitudinal and transversal cracks in the rind with the internal locules exposed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Juice content in diseased citrus fruit was strongly reduced.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
Juice contente0
Direction
strongly reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Juice content in diseased fruit was strongly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The citrus disease reached central and Ashanti regions with incidence over 95%.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Outcome
incidencese0
Value
over 95%e0
Setting
Central and Ashanti Regionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The disease expanded to the Central and Ashanti Regions, with incidences over 95% and estimated yield losses of about 50 to 90%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated citrus yield losses were about 50 to 90%.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Outcome
yield lossese0
Value
about 50 to 90%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“estimated yield losses of about 50 to 90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The isolate from sweet orange leaves had 99% sequence identity with the Pseudocercospora angolensis epitype.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Interactor
Pseudocercospora angolensisPseudocercospora angolensise0pathogen
Outcome
sequencee0
Value
99% identitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sequence had 99% identity (total score 819, 85% coverage) with that of Pseudocercospora angolensis (T. Carvalho & O. Mendes) Crous & U. Braun epitype strain CBS 112933 (GU269836)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1909–2091 · show in text ↑
e1

“obtained from sweet orange leaves in Kade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1833–1874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated sweet orange fruit developed disease with incidence from 40.7% to 92.6%.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise2
Material
Valencia Latee2
Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
Disease incidencee0
Value
40.7% to 92.6%e0
Qualifier
depending on the isolate and inoculation techniquee0
Comparator
sterile distilled watere1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease incidence on inoculated fruit varied from 40.7% to 92.6% and severity from 2 to 3 to 3 to 11 lesions per fruit, depending on the isolate and inoculation technique.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2667–2838 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit treated with sterile distilled water were used as controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2535–2600 · show in text ↑
e2

“sweet orange cv. Valencia Late”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2171–2201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated sweet orange fruit developed 2 to 11 lesions per fruit, depending on isolate and technique.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise2
Treatment
inoculatede3
Outcome
severitye0
Value
2 to 3 to 3 to 11 lesions per fruite0
Comparator
sterile distilled watere1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“severity from 2 to 3 to 3 to 11 lesions per fruit, depending on the isolate and inoculation technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2736–2837 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit treated with sterile distilled water were used as controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2535–2600 · show in text ↑
e2

“sweet orange cv. Valencia Late”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2171–2201 · show in text ↑
e3

“Disease incidence on inoculated fruit varied from 40.7% to 92.6% and severity from 2 to 3 to 3 to 11 lesions per fruit, depending on the isolate and inoculation technique.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2667–2838 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control sweet orange fruit showed no symptoms.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
No symptomse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No symptoms were observed on control fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2839–2882 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet orange cv. Valencia Late”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2171–2201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. angolensis was reisolated from inoculated sweet orange lesions but not asymptomatic controls.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Interactor
P. angolensisPseudocercospora angolensise0pathogen
Outcome
P. angolensis were reisolated from lesions on inoculated fruit, but not from asymptomatic control fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungal colonies morphologically identified as P. angolensis were reisolated from lesions on inoculated fruit, but not from asymptomatic control fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2883–3033 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet orange cv. Valencia Late”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2171–2201 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The citrus disease in Ghana was identified as fruit and leaf spot caused by P. angolensis.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Interactor
P. angolensisPseudocercospora angolensise0pathogen
Outcome
Pseudocercospora fruit and leaf spot of citruse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the disease was identified as Pseudocercospora fruit and leaf spot of citrus caused by P. angolensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3058–3158 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 5 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.