Paper · 1960 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Increased Tolerance of the Boll Weevil and Cotton Fleahopper to Some Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Insecticides in Central Texas in 19581

C. R. Parencia; C. B. Cowan

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis Boh.) and cotton fleahopper (Psallus seriatus (Reut.)) showed increased tolerance to several of the chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides in central Texas in 1958.Topical-application studies on weevils reared from squares collected from one field in July indicated increased tolerance to toxaphene and a high tolerance to dieldrin. In field experiments much better control was obtained with Sevin® (1- naphthyl N-methyl carbamate) and such organic-phosphorus compounds as Guthion® (D,D-dimethyl S-(4-oxo-3H-1,2,3- benzotriazine-3-methyl) phosphorodithioate) and malathion than with toxaphene and dieldrin. Dosages of toxaphene, dieldrin, and heptachlor two and three times those effective in previous years failed to control the cotton fleahopper. Sevin, Guthion, malathion, toxaphene plus DDT, dieldrin plus DDT, and DDT alone were effective, but DDT has not been used against the cotton fleahopper for 10 years in the area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boll weevil and cotton fleahopper showed increased tolerance to several chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides in central Texas in 1958

Interactor
boll weevilAnthonomus grandise1pest
Second interactor
cotton fleahopperPseudatomoscelis seriatuse1pest
Outcome
tolerance to several of the chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticidese1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
central Texase1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Anthonomus grandis
Anthonomus grandis · InteractorAgricultural Research Service , United States Department of Agriculture . · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudatomoscelis seriatus
Pseudatomoscelis seriatus · Second interactorxpda · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Fleahopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“The boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis Boh.) and cotton fleahopper (Psallus seriatus (Reut.)) showed increased tolerance to several of the chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides in central Texas in 1958”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–197 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weevils from squares showed increased tolerance to toxaphene in topical application tests

Interactor
weevilsCurculionidaee2pest
Outcome
tolerance to toxaphenee2
Direction
increasede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Fleahopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–60 · show in text ↑
e2

“Topical-application studies on weevils reared from squares collected from one field in July indicated increased tolerance to toxaphene and a high tolerance to dieldrin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–365 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weevils from squares showed a high tolerance to dieldrin in topical application tests

Interactor
weevilsCurculionidaee2pest
Outcome
high tolerance to dieldrine2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Fleahopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–60 · show in text ↑
e2

“Topical-application studies on weevils reared from squares collected from one field in July indicated increased tolerance to toxaphene and a high tolerance to dieldrin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sevin gave much better control than toxaphene and dieldrin in field experiments

Treatment
Sevine3
Outcome
controle3
Direction
much bettere3
Comparator
toxaphene and dieldrine3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Fleahopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–60 · show in text ↑
e3

“In field experiments much better control was obtained with Sevin® (1- naphthyl N-methyl carbamate) and such organic-phosphorus compounds as Guthion® (D,D-dimethyl S-(4-oxo-3H-1,2,3- benzotriazine-3-methyl) phosphorodithioate) and malathion than with toxaphene and dieldrin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–639 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guthion gave much better control than toxaphene and dieldrin in field experiments

Treatment
Guthione3
Outcome
controle3
Direction
much bettere3
Comparator
toxaphene and dieldrine3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Fleahopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–60 · show in text ↑
e3

“In field experiments much better control was obtained with Sevin® (1- naphthyl N-methyl carbamate) and such organic-phosphorus compounds as Guthion® (D,D-dimethyl S-(4-oxo-3H-1,2,3- benzotriazine-3-methyl) phosphorodithioate) and malathion than with toxaphene and dieldrin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–639 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malathion gave much better control than toxaphene and dieldrin in field experiments

Treatment
malathione3
Outcome
controle3
Direction
much bettere3
Comparator
toxaphene and dieldrine3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Fleahopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–60 · show in text ↑
e3

“In field experiments much better control was obtained with Sevin® (1- naphthyl N-methyl carbamate) and such organic-phosphorus compounds as Guthion® (D,D-dimethyl S-(4-oxo-3H-1,2,3- benzotriazine-3-methyl) phosphorodithioate) and malathion than with toxaphene and dieldrin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–639 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toxaphene, dieldrin and heptachlor at two to three times earlier effective doses failed to control the cotton fleahopper

Treatment
Dosages of toxaphene, dieldrin, and heptachlor two and three times those effective in previous yearse4
Interactor
cotton fleahopperPseudatomoscelis seriatuse4pest
Outcome
control the cotton fleahoppere4
Direction
failede4
Comparator
those effective in previous yearse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudatomoscelis seriatus
Pseudatomoscelis seriatus · Interactorxpda · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Fleahopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–60 · show in text ↑
e4

“Dosages of toxaphene, dieldrin, and heptachlor two and three times those effective in previous years failed to control the cotton fleahopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–781 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sevin, Guthion, malathion and several combinations with DDT were effective against the pests

Outcome
were effectivee5
Qualifier
Sevin, Guthion, malathion, toxaphene plus DDT, dieldrin plus DDT, and DDT alonee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Fleahopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–60 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sevin, Guthion, malathion, toxaphene plus DDT, dieldrin plus DDT, and DDT alone were effective, but DDT has not been used against the cotton fleahopper for 10 years in the area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–959 · show in text ↑

toxaphene · Pseudatomoscelis seriatus · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

azinphos-methyl · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

carbaryl · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

malathion · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.