Paper · 1996 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Influence of gibberellin treatment on flowering and fruiting patterns in mango

CGN Turnbull; KL Anderson; EC Winston

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The potential for using gibberellins (GAS) to modify time of flowering and fruit maturity in mango was investigated. Winter spraying of mango trees grown in the coastal subtropics of Queensland (latitude 27OS) with gibberellin A3 (GA3) or GA4 solutions caused a delay in flowering time of up to 4 weeks, depending on cultivar (Kensington Pride, Glenn, Early Gold) and concentration (50-200 mg/L). There was also a general reduction in number of panicles, particularly at higher GA concentrations. Similar experiments with GA3 on cvv. Kensington Pride and Keitt in tropical North Queensland (latitude 17¦S) did not show any effect either on time or extent of flowering. Fruit yield was highly correlated with the proportion of terminal buds that flowered. Consequently, GA treatments caused significant yield reductions in cv. Kensington Pride, especially at 200 mg/L where only 23% of terminal buds flowered. Fruit size was inversely related to yield, and yield was influenced by tree size. Delayed flowering also resulted in later fruit maturation, by up to 2 weeks. With Early Gold, late-flowering panicles retained 3 times more fruit than those which flowered early, which was possibly related to differences in night temperatures before or at anthesis. Delays in flowering time, which lead to somewhat lesser delays in fruit maturation, can be achieved with suitable GA treatments, but concentration and timing of application are critical if flowering and, hence, yields are not to be reduced. The potential use of this treatment in commercial mango orchards is discussed in relation to extending the fruit production season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter GA3 spray delayed mango flowering by up to four weeks in coastal subtropical Queensland.

Treatment
gibberellin A3 (GA3)e0
Outcome
flowering timee0
Direction
delaye0
Value
up to 4 weekse0
Setting
coastal subtropics of Queenslande0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter spraying of mango trees grown in the coastal subtropics of Queensland (latitude 27OS) with gibberellin A3 (GA3) or GA4 solutions caused a delay in flowering time of up to 4 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter GA4 spray delayed mango flowering by up to four weeks in coastal subtropical Queensland.

Treatment
GA4 solutionse0
Outcome
flowering timee0
Direction
delaye0
Value
up to 4 weekse0
Setting
coastal subtropics of Queenslande0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter spraying of mango trees grown in the coastal subtropics of Queensland (latitude 27OS) with gibberellin A3 (GA3) or GA4 solutions caused a delay in flowering time of up to 4 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA treatments generally reduced panicle number, especially at higher concentration.

Treatment
GAe0
Outcome
number of paniclese0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
particularly at higher GA concentrationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was also a general reduction in number of panicles, particularly at higher GA concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–496 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 did not affect timing of flowering in Kensington Pride and Keitt in tropical North Queensland.

Treatment
GA3e0
Outcome
time or extent of floweringe0
Direction
did not show any effecte0
Setting
tropical North Queenslande0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar experiments with GA3 on cvv. Kensington Pride and Keitt in tropical North Queensland (latitude 17¦S) did not show any effect either on time or extent of flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–668 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 did not affect extent of flowering in Kensington Pride and Keitt in tropical North Queensland.

Treatment
GA3e0
Outcome
extent of floweringe0
Direction
did not show any effecte0
Setting
tropical North Queenslande0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar experiments with GA3 on cvv. Kensington Pride and Keitt in tropical North Queensland (latitude 17¦S) did not show any effect either on time or extent of flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–668 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield was highly correlated with the proportion of flowering terminal buds.

Organ / stage
terminal budse0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield was highly correlated with the proportion of terminal buds that flowered.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA treatments significantly reduced yield in Kensington Pride, especially at 200 mg/L when only 23% of terminal buds flowered.

Material
Kensington Pridee0
Treatment
GA treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Qualifier
especially at 200 mg/L where only 23% of terminal buds flowerede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA treatments caused significant yield reductions in cv. Kensington Pride, especially at 200 mg/L where only 23% of terminal buds flowered.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit size was inversely related to yield.

Organ / stage
Fruite0
Outcome
Fruit sizee0
Qualifier
yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit size was inversely related to yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was influenced by tree size.

Organ / stage
treee0
Outcome
yielde0
Qualifier
tree sizee0

Not reportedMaterialDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield was influenced by tree size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed flowering led to fruit maturation up to two weeks later.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
fruit maturatione0
Direction
latere0
Value
up to 2 weekse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed flowering also resulted in later fruit maturation, by up to 2 weeks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-flowering Early Gold panicles retained three times more fruit than early-flowering panicles.

Material
Early Golde0
Outcome
fruite0
Direction
moree0
Value
3 timese0
Comparator
those which flowered earlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With Early Gold, late-flowering panicles retained 3 times more fruit than those which flowered early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend careful GA concentration and timing to delay flowering without reducing flowering and yield.

Treatment
GA treatmentse0
Outcome
concentration and timing of applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delays in flowering time, which lead to somewhat lesser delays in fruit maturation, can be achieved with suitable GA treatments, but concentration and timing of application are critical if flowering and, hence, yields are not to be reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.