Paper · 2001 · Agronomy Journal

The Use of Allelopathic Legume Cover and Mulch Species for Weed Control in Cropping Systems

Jesús Arturo Caamal‐Maldonado; Juan José Jiménez‐Osornio; Andrea Torres‐Barragán; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
207
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Traditional weed control practices in Mexico use legumes as cover crops or manures. Legumes used in these practices play a dual role in agroecosystems by protecting the soil from erosion and by enriching it with organic matter and N through Rhizobium symbiosis. Farmers in the tropical regions of Mexico use Mucuna spp., Canavalia spp. and other legumes to control weeds in their fields. We conducted in vitro bioassays and greenhouse experiments to evaluate the toxic effect of four legumes velvetbean [ Mucuna deeringiana (Bort) Merr.], jackbean [ Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC.], jumbiebean [ Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit], and wild tamarind [ Lysiloma latisiliquum (L.) Benth.] on weed growth, and on the survival of insects and nematodes. The aqueous leachates (1%) of the four legumes were tested on three test plants by seed germination and radicle growth bioassays in petri dishes. The aqueous leachates of all four legumes exhibited strong phytotoxic effect on the radicle growth of the test plants. The effects of velvetbean and jackbean leachates were also evaluated on the survival of phytopathogenic nematodes. Both leachates had nematotoxic effects. Greenhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of the four legumes dried leaves incorporated as mulches to potting soil, on the number and biomass of weeds, and on the biomass of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum L.) plants. The decomposition of velvetbean and jackbean leaves in potting soil significantly reduced (>50%) the development of phytopathogenic nematodes in the roots of tomato. A 5‐yr field experiment conducted at the University of Yucatan (UADY) evaluated the effect of velvetbean and jackbean used as living cover crops, and jumbiebean and wild tamarind used as dead mulches incorporated on soil surface, on weed growth, and corn ( Zea mays L.) yield. The experimental field was treated with the traditional slash and burn system in February 1994. In July 1994 the experiment was performed using the local agricultural practices in a complete randomized block design with three repetitions. The treatments were: corn+velvetbean, corn+jackbean, corn+jumbiebean, corn+wild tamarind, corn+Paraquat (1,1′‐dimethyl‐4,4′‐bipyridinium ion) herbicide, corn weeded by hand, and plots without corn weeded by hand. The number, biomass, diversity, and relative importance of weeds, as well as corn yield, were evaluated. In addition, taxonomic composition of weeds was determined. All legumes reduced weed growth with velvetbean (as living cover crop) producing the largest weed biomass reduction (68%). These legumes also improved the yield of corn during the first 2 yr of the experiment. For better management of natural resources, the use of legumes as biological tools in agriculture to control weeds and improve soil conditions should be encouraged through coordinated efforts between farmers, academic, and governmental institutions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous leachates of four legumes decrease radicle growth of test plants.

Taxon
four legumese1
Treatment
aqueous leachatese1
Outcome
radicle growth of the test plantse1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The aqueous leachates of all four legumes exhibited strong phytotoxic effect on the radicle growth of the test plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Velvetbean and jackbean leachates decrease survival of phytopathogenic nematodes.

Treatment
velvetbean and jackbean leachatese2
Interactor
phytopathogenic nematodese2pathogen
Outcome
survival of phytopathogenic nematodese2
Direction
decreaseinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Canavalia ensiformis
Canavalia ensiformis · TaxonLígia Prado · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mucuna pruriens var. utilis
Mucuna pruriens var. utilis · Taxon · picture of the speciesDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The effects of velvetbean and jackbean leachates were also evaluated on the survival of phytopathogenic nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1128 · show in text ↑
e3

“Both leachates had nematotoxic effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Decomposed velvetbean and jackbean leaves in potting soil significantly reduced (>50%) the development of phytopathogenic nematodes in tomato roots.

Treatment
velvetbean and jackbean leavese4
Interactor
phytopathogenic nematodese4pathogen
Outcome
development of phytopathogenic nematodese4
Direction
reducede4
Value
>50%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The decomposition of velvetbean and jackbean leaves in potting soil significantly reduced (>50%) the development of phytopathogenic nematodes in the roots of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legumes used as living cover crops reduce weed growth in corn.

Treatment
legumese5
Interactor
weede5weed
Outcome
weed growthe5
Direction
reducede5
Setting
University of Yucatan (UADY)e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“All legumes reduced weed growth with velvetbean (as living cover crop) producing the largest weed biomass reduction (68%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2468–2589 · show in text ↑
e6

“field experiment conducted at the University of Yucatan (UADY)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1643 · show in text ↑
e7

“and corn ( Zea mays L.) yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–1849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Velvetbean as living cover crop gives the largest weed biomass reduction in corn, 68%.

Treatment
velvetbeane5
Interactor
weede5weed
Outcome
weed biomasse5
Direction
reductione5
Value
68%e5
Qualifier
largeste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“All legumes reduced weed growth with velvetbean (as living cover crop) producing the largest weed biomass reduction (68%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2468–2589 · show in text ↑
e7

“and corn ( Zea mays L.) yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–1849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legumes improved corn yield during the first 2 yr of the experiment.

Treatment
legumese6
Outcome
yield of corne6
Direction
improvede6
Qualifier
during the first 2 yr of the experimente6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“These legumes also improved the yield of corn during the first 2 yr of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2591–2676 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The use of legumes as biological tools in agriculture to control weeds and improve soil conditions should be encouraged.

Taxon
legumese7
Outcome
the use of legumes as biological tools in agriculture to control weeds and improve soil conditionse7

Verbatim

e7

“the use of legumes as biological tools in agriculture to control weeds and improve soil conditions should be encouraged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2722–2841 · show in text ↑

Mucuna pruriens var. utilis · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.