Paper · 2012 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Effect of biocontrol agents and biofertilizers on root rot, yield, harvest index and nutrient uptake of cassava (Manihot esculantaCrantz)

A.C. Hridya; G. Byju; Raj Sekhar Misra

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cassava is an important subsidiary food and industrial raw material in the tropics. Root rot disease, caused by Phytophthora palmivora, poses a serious threat to cassava cultivation in Tamil Nadu, India. Field experiments (2008–09) were conducted to study the effect of biocontrol agents (Trichoderma spp. and Pseudomonas fluorescens) and biofertilizers (Azospirillum, vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria) on root rot, yield, harvest index and nutrient uptake of cassava at two NPK rates. The design of the experiment was a split plot with two NPK rates, recommended and 50% recommended rate, as the main plot treatments and five biocontrol agents and biofertilizers as subplot treatments. The results clearly indicated that use of a bioinoculants consortium significantly reduced root rot infection/disease incidence over uninoculated controls. Azospirillum significantly improved the yield of cassava at 50% of the recommended rate of NPK. NPK rates had no significant impact on harvest index of cassava and Trichoderma and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi resulted in a higher harvest index even at 50% of the recommended NPK rate. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake was significantly improved when treated with biofertilizers and/or a consortium.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A bioinoculant consortium significantly reduced cassava root rot incidence against uninoculated controls.

Treatment
bioinoculants consortiume0
Interactor
Phytophthora palmivoraPhytophthora palmivorae1pathogen
Outcome
root rot infection/disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Phytophthora palmivora
Phytophthora palmivora · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, Hawaii, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“use of a bioinoculants consortium significantly reduced root rot infection/disease incidence over uninoculated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused by Phytophthora palmivora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–134 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum significantly improved cassava yield at half the recommended NPK rate.

Treatment
Azospirillume0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
50% of the recommended rate of NPKe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azospirillum significantly improved the yield of cassava at 50% of the recommended rate of NPK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK rate had no significant effect on cassava harvest index.

Treatment
NPK ratese0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
no significant impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK rates had no significant impact on harvest index of cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma yielded a higher cassava harvest index at half the recommended NPK rate.

Treatment
Trichodermae0
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
50% of the recommended NPK ratee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi resulted in a higher harvest index even at 50% of the recommended NPK rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi yielded a higher cassava harvest index at half the recommended NPK rate.

Treatment
vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie0
Interactor
vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
50% of the recommended NPK ratee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi resulted in a higher harvest index even at 50% of the recommended NPK rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizers or a consortium significantly improved cassava nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake.

Treatment
biofertilizers and/or a consortiume0
Outcome
Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptakee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake was significantly improved when treated with biofertilizers and/or a consortium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–111 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 141 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 141 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.