Paper · 1988 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effect of water treatment sludge on growth and elemental composition of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) shoots

Herschel A. Elliott; Leslie M. Singer

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
44
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The impact of a water treatment sludge on the fertility of a silt loam soil was assessed by monitoring the yield and elemental composition of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) shoots in a greenhouse study. Application of sludge at rates from 2–10% (air dry weight basis) raised the soil pH from 5.3 to 8.0 which enhanced plant growth. A substantial reduction in metal (Cd, Zn, Cu, Ni) uptake was observed with sludge amendments, even at the highest rates. The alkaline nature of this sludge (pH=9.3, calcium carbonate equivalence=53%) suggests its potential use as a liming material for agricultural soils. Overly alkaline conditions should be avoided however, as high application rates combined with ammonia fertilization had an antagonistic effect on plant growth, possibly from P deficiency induced by struvite (MgNH4PO4) formation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge application raised soil pH from 5.3 to 8.0.

Treatment
sludge at rates from 2–10%e0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
raisede0
Value
8.0e0
Qualifier
from 5.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of sludge at rates from 2–10% (air dry weight basis) raised the soil pH from 5.3 to 8.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–313 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge amendment enhanced tomato growth.

Treatment
sludge at rates from 2–10%e1
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which enhanced plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–341 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of sludge at rates from 2–10% (air dry weight basis) raised the soil pH from 5.3 to 8.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–313 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge amendment substantially reduced tomato metal uptake, including at the highest rates.

Treatment
sludge amendmentse0
Outcome
metal (Cd, Zn, Cu, Ni) uptakee0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
even at the highest ratese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A substantial reduction in metal (Cd, Zn, Cu, Ni) uptake was observed with sludge amendments, even at the highest rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High sludge rates combined with ammonia fertilizer adversely affected tomato growth.

Treatment
high application rates combined with ammonia fertilizatione0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
antagonistic effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high application rates combined with ammonia fertilization had an antagonistic effect on plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest potential use of alkaline sludge as agricultural liming material.

Outcome
potential use as a liming material for agricultural soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The alkaline nature of this sludge (pH=9.3, calcium carbonate equivalence=53%) suggests its potential use as a liming material for agricultural soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise avoiding overly alkaline conditions.

Outcome
Overly alkaline conditions should be avoidede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overly alkaline conditions should be avoided”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑

ammonia · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

organic · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 22 positive, 9 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 44 positive, 4 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 567 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.