Paper · 1990 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Nutritional quality evaluation of newly developed high‐protein genotypes of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)

Umaid Singh; Ramamurthi Jambunathan; Kulbhushan Saxena; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
61
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Two high‐protein genotypes of pigeonpea ( Cajanus cajan L), HPL 8 and HPL 40, were analysed for their nutritional quality characteristics, and the results were compared with those of normal‐protein genotypes (C 11 and ICPL 211). The protein content of the high‐protein genotypes was higher on average by nearly 20% but their starch content, the principal constituent of the seed, was lower by about 8%. The higher fraction (about 7%) of globulin, the major storage protein, was associated with a lower glutelin fraction in the high‐protein genotypes. The amino acid composition (g per 100 g protein) of the high‐protein genotypes was comparable with those of the normal‐protein genotypes. However, the sulphur‐containing amino acids methionine and cystine were noticeably higher (about 25%) in high‐protein genotypes when results were expressed in g per 100 g sample. No large differences in true protein digestibility, biological value and net protein utilisation were observed between HP and NP genotypes. True protein digestibility was significantly increased by cooking in both whole‐seed and dhal samples. The values for utilisable protein were considerably higher in high‐protein genotypes, suggesting their superiority from the nutritional point of view.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-protein pigeonpea genotypes had about 20% higher protein content than normal-protein genotypes.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
high‐protein genotypese1
Outcome
protein contente1
Direction
highere1
Value
nearly 20%e1
Comparator
normal‐protein genotypese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The protein content of the high‐protein genotypes was higher on average by nearly 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–323 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with those of normal‐protein genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–216 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-protein pigeonpea genotypes had about 8% lower starch content.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
high‐protein genotypese2
Outcome
starch contente1
Direction
lowere1
Value
about 8%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“their starch content, the principal constituent of the seed, was lower by about 8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–410 · show in text ↑
e2

“The protein content of the high‐protein genotypes was higher on average by nearly 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–323 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-protein genotypes had a higher globulin fraction (about 7%).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
high‐protein genotypese1
Outcome
globuline1
Direction
highere1
Value
about 7%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The higher fraction (about 7%) of globulin, the major storage protein, was associated with a lower glutelin fraction in the high‐protein genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-protein genotypes had a lower glutelin fraction, associated with their higher globulin fraction.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
high‐protein genotypese1
Outcome
glutelin fractione1
Direction
lowere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The higher fraction (about 7%) of globulin, the major storage protein, was associated with a lower glutelin fraction in the high‐protein genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The amino acid composition of high-protein genotypes was comparable with normal-protein genotypes.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
high‐protein genotypese1
Outcome
amino acid compositione1
Direction
comparablee1
Comparator
normal‐protein genotypese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The amino acid composition (g per 100 g protein) of the high‐protein genotypes was comparable with those of the normal‐protein genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methionine and cystine were noticeably higher (about 25%) in high-protein genotypes when expressed per 100 g sample.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
high‐protein genotypese1
Outcome
sulphur‐containing amino acids methionine and cystinee1
Direction
highere1
Value
about 25%e1
Qualifier
when results were expressed in g per 100 g samplee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“sulphur‐containing amino acids methionine and cystine were noticeably higher (about 25%) in high‐protein genotypes when results were expressed in g per 100 g sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

True protein digestibility, biological value and net protein utilisation did not differ largely between HP and NP genotypes.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
HP and NP genotypese1
Outcome
true protein digestibility, biological value and net protein utilisatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“No large differences in true protein digestibility, biological value and net protein utilisation were observed between HP and NP genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cooking significantly increased true protein digestibility in whole seed and dhal samples.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Organ / stage
whole‐seed and dhal samplese1
Treatment
cookinge1
Outcome
True protein digestibilitye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“True protein digestibility was significantly increased by cooking in both whole‐seed and dhal samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–101 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Utilisable protein was considerably higher in high-protein genotypes, suggesting nutritional superiority.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
high‐protein genotypese1
Outcome
utilisable proteine1
Direction
highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The values for utilisable protein were considerably higher in high‐protein genotypes, suggesting their superiority from the nutritional point of view”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–101 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: protein · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.