Paper · 2008 · Annals of Applied Biology

Cropping system influences Tomato spotted wilt virus disease development, thrips population and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)

R.C. Ramkat; A.W. Wangai; J.P. Ouma; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Yield of tomato is limited by many diseases including Tomato spotted wilt virus disease. This study was conducted in the field at Kenya Agriculture Research Institute Njoro, Kenya, in 2004 and 2006 to determine the effect of intercropping on disease development, thrips population and yield of tomato variety Cal J grown under four intercrop systems involving kale, onion, maize and sole tomato. The experimental design was a Randomised Complete Block Design (RCBD) replicated three times. Disease scores on tomato–maize differed significantly from tomato–kale and tomato–onion in both years of the study. Maize cropping system had a low significant thrips population from the other cropping systems. Tomato–maize intercrop produced the lowest fruit weights and marketable yield in 2004 and 2006, while yield of onion, kale and maize in intercrops were not significantly different from their monocrops. Land equivalent ratio was >1 in all the cropping systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease scores on tomato intercropped with maize differed significantly from tomato intercropped with kale or onion in both years.

Treatment
tomato–maizee1
Interactor
Tomato spotted wilt virusOrthotospovirus tomatomaculaee0pathogen
Outcome
Disease scorese1
Comparator
tomato–kale and tomato–onione1
Setting
field at Kenya Agriculture Research Institute Njoro, Kenyae2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of tomato is limited by many diseases including Tomato spotted wilt virus disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Disease scores on tomato–maize differed significantly from tomato–kale and tomato–onion in both years of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–613 · show in text ↑
e2

“This study was conducted in the field at Kenya Agriculture Research Institute Njoro, Kenya, in 2004 and 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize cropping system had a significantly low thrips population compared with the other cropping systems.

Treatment
Maize cropping systeme1
Interactor
thripsThripse1pest
Outcome
thrips populatione1
Direction
lowe1
Comparator
other cropping systemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maize cropping system had a low significant thrips population from the other cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–708 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield of tomato variety Cal J”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tomato–maize intercrop produced the lowest fruit weights and marketable yield in 2004 and 2006.

Treatment
Tomato–maize intercrope1
Outcome
fruit weights and marketable yielde1
Direction
loweste1
Qualifier
in 2004 and 2006e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tomato–maize intercrop produced the lowest fruit weights and marketable yield in 2004 and 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of onion, kale and maize did not differ significantly between intercrops and their monocrops.

Treatment
intercropse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
not significantly differente1
Comparator
their monocropse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“yield of onion, kale and maize in intercrops were not significantly different from their monocrops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–910 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Land equivalent ratio was above 1 in all the cropping systems.

Outcome
Land equivalent ratioe1
Value
>1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Land equivalent ratio was >1 in all the cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–968 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield of tomato variety Cal J”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–323 · show in text ↑

intercropping · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

intercropping · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 17 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

intercropping · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 35 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 613 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.