Paper · 2009 · DigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University)

Plasticity in Response to Changing Light Environment for Red Spruce and Balsam Fir

Sarah Zazzaro

11
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Red spruce is a major component of the Acadian forest and an important timber resource. Unfortunately, populations are decreasing, with red spruce often replaced by balsam fir. As the 'gate-keeper' for the success of tree species is usually the more vulnerable seedling life-stage, we have focused our attention on differences between seedlings and how they respond to silvicultural practices. Previous studies suggest balsam fir is a competitive stress on red spruce during early development, and understory light conditions may favor regeneration of one species over the other. In this study we evaluated how seedlings of the two species performed after a simulated overstory removal, with light environments rapidly changing from relatively closed canopy to open sky. We grew first-year and two-year-old seedlings in an understory light environment (10% sunlight), and in mid growing season relocated half of the seedlings to full sunlight. To seedlings sunlight can be both a resource and a stress which can be quantified by growth, resource allocation, photosynthetic parameters, and photoprotective mechanisms. Xanthophyll pigments dissipate excess energy absorbed from sunlight and in turn help protect the plant from photoinhibition. Therefore, total zanthophyll concentration along with the ratio of active forms (zeaxanthin and antheraxanthin) to total zanthophylls are indicative of ability to withstand high-light stress. In addition, chlorophyll fluorescence was used to quantify stress on photosystem II resulting from the experimental treatments, as well as the relative amounts of intercepted sunlight dissipated through photochemical and non-photochemical pathways. While both species showed similar ratios of active to total xanthophylls, fir seedlings had a greater total pool than spruce. Fluorescence data indicated that the two species have similar ratios of photochemical (qP) and non-photochemical (qN) quenching of absorbed light energy. However, the fluorescence parameter Fv/Fm, used to assess damage to photosystem II, suggests that fir suffers a lower decrease in photochemical efficiency when exposed to the high-light environment than does red spruce. Spruce seedlings exhibited a much greater total biomass, overall height and allocation to shoots compared to roots. In addition, spruce seedlings exhibited far greater photosynthetic rates during both years. Overall, fir exhibited a more conservative approach allocating more resources to photoprotection and roots relative to foliar biomass and photosynthetic systems. Spruce allocated more to growth, biomass, and photosynthesis and had greater foliage and height growth. Therefore, we expect that spruce seedlings would have a competitive edge due to its greater photosynthetic rates and leaf area in post-harvest or post-disturbance environments when (1) moisture was not limiting and (2) light stress was moderated by a partial overstory. In higher energy environments, where light stress and moisture stress are highly correlated, the more conservative seedling life-stage strategy of balsam fir would seem to be superior.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fir had a larger total xanthophyll pool than spruce, though active ratios were similar.

Taxon
fire0
Outcome
total poole0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
sprucee0

Verbatim

e0

“both species showed similar ratios of active to total xanthophylls, fir seedlings had a greater total pool than spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1807 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fir and spruce had similar active to total xanthophyll ratios.

Taxon
fire1
Outcome
ratios of active to total xanthophyllse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
sprucee1

Verbatim

e0

“both species showed similar ratios of active to total xanthophylls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1755 · show in text ↑
e1

“fir seedlings had a greater total pool than spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1807 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fir and spruce had similar photochemical and nonphotochemical quenching ratios.

Taxon
fire1
Outcome
ratios of photochemical (qP) and non-photochemical (qN) quenchinge0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
sprucee1

Verbatim

e0

“the two species have similar ratios of photochemical (qP) and non-photochemical (qN) quenching of absorbed light energy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1842–1961 · show in text ↑
e1

“fir seedlings had a greater total pool than spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High light decreased fir photochemical efficiency less than red spruce.

Taxon
fire0
Treatment
high-light environmente0
Outcome
photochemical efficiencye0
Direction
lower decreasee0
Comparator
red sprucee0

Verbatim

e0

“fir suffers a lower decrease in photochemical efficiency when exposed to the high-light environment than does red spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2061–2181 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spruce seedlings had greater biomass, height and shoot allocation than fir.

Taxon
SprucePiceae0
Outcome
total biomass, overall height and allocation to shootse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spruce seedlings exhibited a much greater total biomass, overall height and allocation to shoots compared to roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2183–2297 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spruce had greater photosynthetic rates during both years.

Taxon
sprucePiceae0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
during both yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spruce seedlings exhibited far greater photosynthetic rates during both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2312–2389 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fir allocated more resources to photoprotection and roots.

Taxon
fire0
Outcome
resources to photoprotection and rootse0
Direction
moree0

Verbatim

e0

“fir exhibited a more conservative approach allocating more resources to photoprotection and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2400–2497 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spruce allocated more to growth, biomass and photosynthesis.

Taxon
SprucePiceae0
Outcome
growth, biomass, and photosynthesise0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spruce allocated more to growth, biomass, and photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2553–2613 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spruce had greater foliage and height growth.

Taxon
SprucePiceae1
Outcome
foliage and height growthe0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had greater foliage and height growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2618–2655 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spruce allocated more to growth, biomass, and photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2553–2613 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors expect spruce to compete better after disturbance if moisture is sufficient and partial overstory moderates light.

Taxon
sprucePiceae0
Outcome
competitive edgee0
Qualifier
moisture was not limiting and (2) light stress was moderated by a partial overstorye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spruce seedlings would have a competitive edge due to its greater photosynthetic rates and leaf area in post-harvest or post-disturbance environments when (1) moisture was not limiting and (2) light stress was moderated by a partial overstory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2683–2925 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that balsam fir strategy is superior in high energy settings with correlated light and moisture stress.

Taxon
balsam firAbies balsameae0
Outcome
more conservative seedling life-stage strategy of balsam fir would seem to be superiore0
Qualifier
light stress and moisture stress are highly correlatede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abies balsamea
Abies balsamea · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In higher energy environments, where light stress and moisture stress are highly correlated, the more conservative seedling life-stage strategy of balsam fir would seem to be superior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2927–3110 · show in text ↑