Paper · 2010 · Agronomy Journal

Mitigation of Seed Germination Impediments in Hairy Vetch

Krista L. Jacobsen; Robert S. Gallagher; Mark Burnham; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa Roth) is a promising winter cover crop for northern climates, but germination can be limited by low soil moisture conditions. Farmers may be reluctant to use hairy vetch, concerned that hard seed will emerge as weeds in succeeding crops. This work examines germination, dormancy, and viability of hairy vetch seeds from nine commercial seed sources, and evaluates the effects of mechanical scarification and ambient temperature hydropriming on the degree of hard‐seededness, germination, seed viability and seedling vigor in a range of simulated soil moisture conditions. Hydropriming increased germination by 5% across seed sources and water potentials, but reduced seedling growth by 16%. Mechanical scarification eliminated all hard‐seededness, but increased physiologically dormant seed by ∼5% and nonviable seed by ∼2% and reduced seedling growth by 39%. This work indicates that pretreatments may increase germination and reduce hard‐seededness, but reduce seed viability and seedling vigor in some seed sources.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydropriming increased germination by 5%.

Taxon
Hairy vetchVicia villosat0
Treatment
Hydropriminge0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5%e0
Qualifier
across seed sources and water potentialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia villosa
Vicia villosa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Fabelfroh assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hydropriming increased germination by 5% across seed sources and water potentials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hairy vetch”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 46–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydropriming reduced seedling growth by 16%.

Taxon
Hairy vetchVicia villosat0
Treatment
Hydropriminge0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
16%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia villosa
Vicia villosa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Fabelfroh assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hydropriming increased germination by 5% across seed sources and water potentials, but reduced seedling growth by 16%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hairy vetch”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 46–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical scarification eliminated hard seededness.

Taxon
Hairy vetchVicia villosat0
Treatment
Mechanical scarificatione0
Outcome
hard‐seedednesse0
Direction
eliminatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia villosa
Vicia villosa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Fabelfroh assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical scarification eliminated all hard‐seededness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hairy vetch”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 46–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical scarification increased physiological dormancy by about 5%.

Taxon
Hairy vetchVicia villosat0
Treatment
Mechanical scarificatione0
Outcome
physiologically dormant seede0
Direction
increasede0
Value
∼5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia villosa
Vicia villosa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Fabelfroh assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical scarification eliminated all hard‐seededness, but increased physiologically dormant seed by ∼5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hairy vetch”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 46–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical scarification increased nonviable seed by about 2%.

Taxon
Hairy vetchVicia villosat0
Treatment
Mechanical scarificatione1
Outcome
nonviable seede0
Direction
increasede0
Value
∼2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia villosa
Vicia villosa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Fabelfroh assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased physiologically dormant seed by ∼5% and nonviable seed by ∼2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hairy vetch”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 46–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mechanical scarification eliminated all hard‐seededness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical scarification reduced seedling growth by 39%.

Taxon
Hairy vetchVicia villosat0
Treatment
Mechanical scarificatione0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
39%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia villosa
Vicia villosa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Fabelfroh assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical scarification eliminated all hard‐seededness, but increased physiologically dormant seed by ∼5% and nonviable seed by ∼2% and reduced seedling growth by 39%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hairy vetch”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 46–57 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Pretreatments may improve germination and reduce hard seededness at a cost to viability and vigor in some sources.

Taxon
Hairy vetchVicia villosat0
Outcome
germination and reduce hard‐seedednesse0
Qualifier
in some seed sourcese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia villosa
Vicia villosa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Fabelfroh assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pretreatments may increase germination and reduce hard‐seededness, but reduce seed viability and seedling vigor in some seed sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hairy vetch”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 46–57 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · growth · Vicia villosa (hairy vetch)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.