Paper · 1971 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

EFFECT OF ACIDITY ON GROWTH AND NUTRIENT COMPOSITION OF THE HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY

L. R. TOWNSEND

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two highbush blueberry cultivars (Blueray and seedling selection 50-6-9) were grown at various pH levels in water cultures. Within the pH range 3.5 to 6.0, growth of Blueray did not appear to be limited because of the direct effects of pH. At pH 2.5, however, growth was nonexistent and at pH 3.0 it was restricted. Growth of 50-6-9 was significantly greater at pH 4.0 and 5.0 than at pH 3.0 or 6.0. Plant roots became progressively darker with increasing pH above 4.0 to 4.5. In general, root nutrient levels, Ca excepted, were higher than foliar nutrient levels, although root and foliar Mg levels were not very different except at pH 3.0. Root Mn at pH 5.0 and 6.0 was 10 to 20 times greater than at pH 3.0 or 4.0.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blueray growth was apparently not limited by direct pH effects from 3.5 to 6.0.

Taxon
HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYVaccinium corymbosumt0
Material
Blueraye0
Treatment
pH range 3.5 to 6.0e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
did not appear to be limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium corymbosum
Vaccinium corymbosum · TaxonThe original Uploader was Oven Fresh at English Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Within the pH range 3.5 to 6.0, growth of Blueray did not appear to be limited because of the direct effects of pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–239 · show in text ↑
t0

“HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blueray had no growth at pH 2.5.

Taxon
HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYVaccinium corymbosumt0
Treatment
pH 2.5e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
nonexistente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium corymbosum
Vaccinium corymbosum · TaxonThe original Uploader was Oven Fresh at English Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At pH 2.5, however, growth was nonexistent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–282 · show in text ↑
t0

“HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blueray growth was restricted at pH 3.0.

Taxon
HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYVaccinium corymbosumt0
Treatment
pH 3.0e0
Outcome
restrictede0
Direction
restrictede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium corymbosum
Vaccinium corymbosum · TaxonThe original Uploader was Oven Fresh at English Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at pH 3.0 it was restricted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–314 · show in text ↑
t0

“HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection 50-6-9 grew significantly more at pH 4.0 and 5.0 than at 3.0 or 6.0.

Taxon
HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYVaccinium corymbosumt0
Material
50-6-9e0
Treatment
pH 4.0 and 5.0e0
Outcome
Growthe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
pH 3.0 or 6.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium corymbosum
Vaccinium corymbosum · TaxonThe original Uploader was Oven Fresh at English Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of 50-6-9 was significantly greater at pH 4.0 and 5.0 than at pH 3.0 or 6.0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–399 · show in text ↑
t0

“HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blueberry roots darkened progressively as pH rose above 4.0 to 4.5.

Taxon
HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYVaccinium corymbosumt0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
increasing pH above 4.0 to 4.5e0
Outcome
progressively darkere0
Direction
darkere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium corymbosum
Vaccinium corymbosum · TaxonThe original Uploader was Oven Fresh at English Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant roots became progressively darker with increasing pH above 4.0 to 4.5.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–476 · show in text ↑
t0

“HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root nutrient levels generally exceeded foliar levels except for calcium.

Taxon
HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYVaccinium corymbosumt0
Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
nutrient levelse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
Ca exceptede0
Comparator
foliar nutrient levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium corymbosum
Vaccinium corymbosum · TaxonThe original Uploader was Oven Fresh at English Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general, root nutrient levels, Ca excepted, were higher than foliar nutrient levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–563 · show in text ↑
t0

“HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root and foliar magnesium levels were similar except at pH 3.0.

Taxon
HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYVaccinium corymbosumt0
Outcome
root and foliar Mg levelse0
Direction
not very differente0
Qualifier
except at pH 3.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium corymbosum
Vaccinium corymbosum · TaxonThe original Uploader was Oven Fresh at English Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root and foliar Mg levels were not very different except at pH 3.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root manganese at pH 5.0 and 6.0 was 10 to 20 times that at pH 3.0 or 4.0.

Taxon
HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYVaccinium corymbosumt0
Organ / stage
Roote0
Treatment
pH 5.0 and 6.0e0
Outcome
Root Mne0
Direction
greatere0
Value
10 to 20 timese0
Comparator
pH 3.0 or 4.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium corymbosum
Vaccinium corymbosum · TaxonThe original Uploader was Oven Fresh at English Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root Mn at pH 5.0 and 6.0 was 10 to 20 times greater than at pH 3.0 or 4.0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–78 · show in text ↑

ph · growth · Vaccinium corymbosum (highbush blueberry)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.