Paper · 1997 · Canadian Journal of Soil Science

Soybean nitrogen contribution to corn and residual nitrate under conventional tillage and no-till

F. S. Rembon; A. F. MacKenzie

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Soybean (Glycine max L. Merill) can produce high-N residues that may benefit subsequent corn (Zea mays L.) production, but the degree of benefit is often unpredictable and may be related to tillage methods. This study investigated the effects of conventional-tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) on fertilizer replacement values for corn in a corn-soybean rotation. Field experiments were conducted for two growing seasons on two soils, a Ste. Rosalie clay (Humic Gleysol), and an Ormstown silty clay (Humic Gleysol). Continuous corn, corn following soybean, soybean following corn, continuous soybean, and three levels of fertilizer N (0, 90, 180 and 0, 20, and 40 kg N ha −1 for corn and soybean, respectively) were compared. Tillage did not effect yield or N uptake consistently. Corn grain yields and N uptake were greater following soybean than following corn. Soybean provided N fertilizer credits ranging from 40 to 150 kg N ha −1 , which was greater than the residual NO 3 in the soil prior to planting. Credits were greater in the year with higher corn yields and lower previous winter precipitation resulting in greater NO 3 carryover. Tillage effects on N credits from soybean differed between the sites. Consequently, N contributions of soybean to corn could not be related to tillage method or soil type. Key words:Zea mays L., Glycine max L. Merill, rotations, grain yield, N uptake, tillage, fertilizer N

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage did not consistently affect yield or nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
Tillagee0
Outcome
yield or N uptakee0
Direction
did not effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tillage did not effect yield or N uptake consistently.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield was higher following soybean than following corn.

Treatment
following soybeane1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
following corne1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn grain yields and N uptake were greater following soybean than following corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn nitrogen uptake was higher following soybean than following corn.

Treatment
following soybeane1
Outcome
N uptakee1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
following corne1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn grain yields and N uptake were greater following soybean than following corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–861 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean provided nitrogen fertilizer credits of 40 to 150 kg N per hectare.

Outcome
N fertilizer creditse2
Direction
greatere2
Value
40 to 150 kg N ha −1e2
Comparator
residual NO 3 in the soil prior to plantinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Soybean provided N fertilizer credits ranging from 40 to 150 kg N ha −1 , which was greater than the residual NO 3 in the soil prior to planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen credits were greater with higher corn yields and lower winter precipitation.

Outcome
Creditse3
Direction
greatere3
Qualifier
higher corn yields and lower previous winter precipitatione3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorTreatmentComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37 · show in text ↑
e3

“Credits were greater in the year with higher corn yields and lower previous winter precipitation resulting in greater NO 3 carryover.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1141 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage effects on soybean nitrogen credits differed between sites.

Outcome
Tillage effects on N credits from soybeane4
Direction
differede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37 · show in text ↑
e4

“Tillage effects on N credits from soybean differed between the sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1211 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean nitrogen contributions to corn were unrelated to tillage method or soil type.

Treatment
tillage methode5
Outcome
N contributions of soybean to corne5
Direction
could not be relatede5
Qualifier
soil typee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“N contributions of soybean to corn could not be related to tillage method or soil type.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1313 · show in text ↑

Glycine max · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Glycine max · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 155 positive, 25 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
    corn yield increased up to 30% versus monoculture.

    Corn–Soybean Rotation Effects on Soil Water Depletion · 1993 · compared with monoculture

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive

176 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.