Paper · 1998 · Journal of Vegetation Science

Revegetation following experimental disturbance in a boreal old‐growth Picea abies forest

Knut Rydgren; Geir Hestmark; Rune H. Økland

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
100
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract. We studied revegetation patterns after experimental fine‐scale disturbance (e.g. uprooting) in an old‐growth Picea abies forest in southeastern Norway. An experimental severity gradient was established by manipulation of the depth of soil disturbance; two types of disturbed areas were used. Species recovery was recorded in the disturbed patches in three successive years after disturbance. The cover of vascular plants and, even more so the cover of bryophytes and lichens, recovered slowly after disturbance. The least severe treatments (removal of vegetation and removal of vegetation and the litter layer) was followed by the fastest recovery. The mean number of vascular plant species was usually higher three years after disturbance than before disturbance, while the opposite was true for bryophytes. Several vascular plant species that were abundant in intact forest floor vegetation ( Vaccinium myrtillus, V. vitis‐idaea and Deschampsia flexuosa ) recovered during a three‐year period primarily by resprouting from intact rhizomes and clonal in‐growth. Other important recovery mechanisms included germination from a soil‐buried propagule bank (e.g. Luzula pilosa, Plagiothecium laetum agg., Pohlia nutans and Polytrichum spp.) and dispersal of propagules into the disturbed patches (e.g. Betula pubescens and Picea abies ). Microsite limitation seemed to occur in several species that were abundant in the soil propagule bank (e.g. the ferns Athyrium filix‐femina, Gymnocarpium dryopteris and Phegopteris connectilis ) but which did not appear in disturbed patches. Disturbance severity influenced revegetation patterns, recorded both as trajectories of vegetation composition in a DCA ordination space and as change in floristic dissimilarity. The length of the successional path (compositional change measured in β‐diversity units) increased with increasing disturbance severity, and was also influenced by the area of the disturbed patch and the distance to intact vegetation. The rate of succession depended on the method by which it was measured; decreasing year by year in floristic space, while first decreasing and then increasing in ordination space. The reason for this difference is explained.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover of vascular plants recovered slowly after disturbance.

Taxon
vascular plantsTracheophytae1
Treatment
disturbancee1
Outcome
covere1
Direction
recovered slowlye1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The cover of vascular plants and, even more so the cover of bryophytes and lichens, recovered slowly after disturbance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover of bryophytes and lichens recovered even more slowly after disturbance than vascular plant cover.

Taxon
bryophytes and lichense1
Treatment
disturbancee1
Outcome
covere1
Direction
recovered slowlye1
Qualifier
even more soe1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The cover of vascular plants and, even more so the cover of bryophytes and lichens, recovered slowly after disturbance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The least severe treatments were followed by the fastest recovery in Picea abies forest.

Taxon
Picea abiesPicea abiese0
Treatment
removal of vegetatione2
Outcome
recoverye2
Direction
fasteste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in an old‐growth Picea abies forest in southeastern Norway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–160 · show in text ↑
e2

“The least severe treatments (removal of vegetation and removal of vegetation and the litter layer) was followed by the fastest recovery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mean number of vascular plant species was higher three years after disturbance than before.

Taxon
vascular plant speciese3
Treatment
disturbancee3
Outcome
mean numbere3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
before disturbancee3

Verbatim

e3

“The mean number of vascular plant species was usually higher three years after disturbance than before disturbance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of bryophyte species showed the opposite pattern, lower three years after disturbance than before.

Taxon
bryophytese4
Treatment
disturbancee3
Outcome
mean numbere3
Direction
the oppositee4
Comparator
before disturbancee3

Verbatim

e3

“The mean number of vascular plant species was usually higher three years after disturbance than before disturbance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–773 · show in text ↑
e4

“while the opposite was true for bryophytes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–817 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vaccinium myrtillus recovered after disturbance primarily by resprouting from intact rhizomes.

Taxon
Vaccinium myrtillusVaccinium myrtilluse6
Outcome
recoverede5
Qualifier
primarily by resprouting from intact rhizomese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium myrtillus
Vaccinium myrtillus · TaxonBenjamin Zwittnig · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e5

“recovered during a three‐year period primarily by resprouting from intact rhizomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1050 · show in text ↑
e6

“Vaccinium myrtillus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–924 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination from the soil propagule bank was an important recovery mechanism for Luzula pilosa.

Taxon
Luzula pilosaLuzula pilosae1
Outcome
recoverye7
Qualifier
propagule banke7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luzula pilosa
Luzula pilosa · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Other important recovery mechanisms included germination from a soil‐buried propagule bank”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1163 · show in text ↑
e1

“Luzula pilosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1183 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dispersal of propagules into disturbed patches was an important recovery mechanism for Betula pubescens.

Taxon
Betula pubescensBetula pubescense1
Outcome
recoverye7
Qualifier
dispersal of propagules into the disturbed patchese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pubescens
Betula pubescens · TaxonElfo del bosque · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Other important recovery mechanisms included germination from a soil‐buried propagule bank”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1163 · show in text ↑
e1

“dispersal of propagules into the disturbed patches (e.g. Betula pubescens and Picea abies )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1343 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microsite limitation may prevent Gymnocarpium dryopteris from appearing in disturbed patches.

Taxon
Gymnocarpium dryopterisGymnocarpium dryopterise1
Outcome
did not appear in disturbed patchese2
Qualifier
Microsite limitatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gymnocarpium dryopteris
Gymnocarpium dryopteris · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microsite limitation seemed to occur in several species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1400 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gymnocarpium dryopteris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1509 · show in text ↑
e2

“but which did not appear in disturbed patches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1585 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disturbance severity influenced revegetation patterns.

Taxon
Picea abiesPicea abiese0
Treatment
Disturbance severitye1
Outcome
revegetation patternse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in an old‐growth Picea abies forest in southeastern Norway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“Disturbance severity influenced revegetation patterns, recorded both as trajectories of vegetation composition in a DCA ordination space and as change in floristic dissimilarity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1764 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The length of the successional path increased with increasing disturbance severity.

Taxon
Picea abiesPicea abiese0
Treatment
disturbance severitye2
Outcome
length of the successional pathe1
Direction
increasede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in an old‐growth Picea abies forest in southeastern Norway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“The length of the successional path”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1801 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased with increasing disturbance severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1855–1901 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The length of the successional path was also influenced by the area of the disturbed patch and the distance to intact vegetation.

Taxon
Picea abiesPicea abiese0
Treatment
area of the disturbed patche2
Outcome
length of the successional pathe1
Qualifier
distance to intact vegetatione2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in an old‐growth Picea abies forest in southeastern Norway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“The length of the successional path”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1801 · show in text ↑
e2

“was also influenced by the area of the disturbed patch and the distance to intact vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1907–1999 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate of succession decreased year by year in floristic space.

Taxon
Picea abiesPicea abiese0
Outcome
rate of successione1
Direction
decreasing year by yeare1
Qualifier
in floristic spacee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in an old‐growth Picea abies forest in southeastern Norway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rate of succession depended on the method by which it was measured; decreasing year by year in floristic space”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2001–2115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate of succession first decreased and then increased in ordination space.

Taxon
Picea abiesPicea abiese0
Outcome
rate of successione1
Direction
first decreasing and then increasinge2
Qualifier
in ordination spacee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in an old‐growth Picea abies forest in southeastern Norway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rate of succession depended on the method by which it was measured; decreasing year by year in floristic space”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2001–2115 · show in text ↑
e2

“while first decreasing and then increasing in ordination space”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2117–2179 · show in text ↑