Paper · 1991 · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

SHELF-LIFE EXTENSION of MICHIGAN APPLES USING SUCROSE POLYESTER

YEN-LING CHAI; DANA B. OTT; JERRY N. CASH

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
21
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Golden Delicious, Ida Red and McIntosh apples were treated with the sucrose polyester (SPE) SemperfreshTM, to determine its influence on apple maturity parameters, assess its value to delay ripening and to improve shelf life during cold storage. Apple quality objective and sensory measurements included: Hunter color differences, Magness-Taylor texture and Kramer Shear Press firmness, soluble solids, total acidity, sensory difference from control and consumer acceptability tests. the influences of Semperfresh on storage quality of the apple cultivars varied. SPE retarded apple ripening as shown by persistence of green tissue colors, and increased tissue firmness and titratable acidity. Soluble solids were not significantly affected by Semperfresh treatments. SPE treated apples exhibited sensory differences when compared to the controls, but SPE treatments did not have the same sensory effects on each cultivar. SPE treatment improved consumer acceptability ratings for Golden Delicious and McIntosh apples, but had no significant improvement for Ida Red apples.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPE retarded apple ripening, shown by persistence of green tissue colours.

Treatment
SPEe1
Outcome
ripeninge1
Direction
retardede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“SPE retarded apple ripening as shown by persistence of green tissue colors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPE increased tissue firmness and titratable acidity.

Treatment
SPEe1
Outcome
tissue firmness and titratable aciditye2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“SPE retarded apple ripening as shown by persistence of green tissue colors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–638 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased tissue firmness and titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble solids were not significantly affected by SPE treatments.

Treatment
Semperfresh treatmentse3
Outcome
Soluble solidse3
Direction
not significantly affectede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“SPE retarded apple ripening as shown by persistence of green tissue colors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–638 · show in text ↑
e3

“Soluble solids were not significantly affected by Semperfresh treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPE-treated apples differed in sensory attributes from controls.

Treatment
SPEe4
Outcome
sensory differencese4
Comparator
the controlse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“SPE treated apples exhibited sensory differences when compared to the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPE did not have the same sensory effect on each apple cultivar.

Material
each cultivare5
Treatment
SPE treatmentse5
Outcome
sensory effectse5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“SPE retarded apple ripening as shown by persistence of green tissue colors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–638 · show in text ↑
e5

“SPE treatments did not have the same sensory effects on each cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–921 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPE improved consumer acceptability of Golden Delicious and McIntosh apples.

Material
Golden Delicious and McIntoshe6
Treatment
SPE treatmente6
Outcome
consumer acceptability ratingse6
Direction
improvede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“SPE treatment improved consumer acceptability ratings for Golden Delicious and McIntosh apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SPE gave no significant improvement in consumer acceptability of Ida Red apples.

Material
Ida Rede7
Treatment
SPEe1
Outcome
consumer acceptabilitye6
Direction
no significant improvemente7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“SPE retarded apple ripening as shown by persistence of green tissue colors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–638 · show in text ↑
e6

“SPE treatment improved consumer acceptability ratings for Golden Delicious and McIntosh apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1017 · show in text ↑
e7

“but had no significant improvement for Ida Red apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The influence of Semperfresh on storage quality varied among apple cultivars.

Material
the apple cultivarse1
Treatment
Semperfreshe1
Outcome
storage qualitye1
Direction
variede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the influences of Semperfresh on storage quality of the apple cultivars varied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–562 · show in text ↑

sucrose · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

sucrose · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.