Paper · 1998 · Tree Physiology

Growth, productivity and water use in three hybrid poplar clones

C. A. Souch; W. Stephens

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
64
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Three drought treatments (none, medium and severe) were applied to three container-grown, hybrid poplar clones (Beaupré, Trichobel and Ghoy) as a series of drying cycles over two years-in a greenhouse in 1994 and outside in 1995. Leaf area development, annual biomass production and annual water use were recorded. Clone Beaupré had greater rates of leaf area development (up to 11.8 x 10(-4) m(2) degrees C day(-1)) and subsequently greater dry matter production (up to 816 g tree(-1) year(-1)) and water use (up to 168 l tree(-1) year(-1)) than the other two clones. In all clones, rates of leaf area development, annual biomass production and water use were less under drought conditions than under well-watered conditions. On a proportional basis, the highest reduction in biomass by drought was in Trichobel (up to 74%), whereas, in absolute terms, the reduction was greatest in Beaupré (up to 500 g tree(-1)). However, under drought conditions, annual biomass production was greater in Clone Beaupré than in the other clones. The relationship between water use and biomass production was constant over both years, and was similar for Beaupré and Trichobel at 4.4 g l(-1), but was less for Ghoy at 3.5 g l(-1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beaupré had greater leaf area development than Trichobel and Ghoy, reaching 11.8 x 10(-4) m(2) degrees C day(-1).

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Material
Beauprée0
Outcome
rates of leaf area developmente0
Direction
greatere0
Value
11.8 x 10(-4) m(2) degrees C day(-1)e0
Comparator
other two clonese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clone Beaupré had greater rates of leaf area development (up to 11.8 x 10(-4) m(2) degrees C day(-1)) and subsequently greater dry matter production (up to 816 g tree(-1) year(-1)) and water use (up to 168 l tree(-1) year(-1)) than the other two clones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beaupré produced more dry matter than the other clones, up to 816 g tree(-1) year(-1).

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Material
Beauprée0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
greatere0
Value
816 g tree(-1) year(-1)e0
Comparator
other two clonese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clone Beaupré had greater rates of leaf area development (up to 11.8 x 10(-4) m(2) degrees C day(-1)) and subsequently greater dry matter production (up to 816 g tree(-1) year(-1)) and water use (up to 168 l tree(-1) year(-1)) than the other two clones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beaupré used more water than the other clones, up to 168 l tree(-1) year(-1).

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Material
Beauprée0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
greatere0
Value
168 l tree(-1) year(-1)e0
Comparator
other two clonese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clone Beaupré had greater rates of leaf area development (up to 11.8 x 10(-4) m(2) degrees C day(-1)) and subsequently greater dry matter production (up to 816 g tree(-1) year(-1)) and water use (up to 168 l tree(-1) year(-1)) than the other two clones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced leaf area development, biomass and water use in all clones relative to well-watered conditions.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Treatment
drought conditionse0
Outcome
rates of leaf area development, annual biomass production and water usee0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
well-watered conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all clones, rates of leaf area development, annual biomass production and water use were less under drought conditions than under well-watered conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichobel had the largest proportional drought-induced biomass loss, up to 74%.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Material
Trichobele0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
74%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest reduction in biomass by drought was in Trichobel (up to 74%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beaupré had the largest absolute drought-induced biomass loss, up to 500 g tree(-1).

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Material
Beauprée0
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
greateste0
Value
500 g tree(-1)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduction was greatest in Beaupré (up to 500 g tree(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–914 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest reduction in biomass by drought was in Trichobel (up to 74%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, Beaupré produced more annual biomass than the other clones.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Material
Beauprée0
Outcome
annual biomass productione0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
under drought conditionse0
Comparator
other clonese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under drought conditions, annual biomass production was greater in Clone Beaupré than in the other clones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-use to biomass-production relation remained constant over both years.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Outcome
relationship between water use and biomass productione0
Direction
constante0
Setting
both yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship between water use and biomass production was constant over both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beaupré and Trichobel had similar water-use efficiency of 4.4 g l(-1).

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Material
Beauprée0
Outcome
similare0
Value
4.4 g l(-1)e0
Comparator
Trichobele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was similar for Beaupré and Trichobel at 4.4 g l(-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ghoy had lower water-use efficiency, 3.5 g l(-1).

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopulust0
Material
Ghoye0
Outcome
lesse0
Direction
lesse0
Value
3.5 g l(-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but was less for Ghoy at 3.5 g l(-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

drought · growth · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 2 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.