Paper · 2011 · Engenharia Agrícola

Quality of beans stored under hermetic conditions

Romenique da S Freitas; Lêda R. DA Faroni; Adalberto H Sousa; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the quality of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) stored with different moisture contents under hermetic conditions. Beans with 12.3%, 15.7%, and 17.8% moisture content were used in the experiment. They were packed in bag type silos (3 kg), PET bottles (1.5 L), and glass containers (3 L), covered with organza fabric (control), and stored at 25 ºC and 70±5% relative humidity, for 120 days. The evaluated characteristics included moisture content, apparent density, electrical conductivity, germination percentage, cooking time, and bean classification, every 30 days. Except for the electrical conductivity and cooking time, the other characteristics were kept for 120 days in the stored product with moisture contents of 12.3% and 15.7% in hermetic conditions. Beans with 17.8% of the moisture content, electrical conductivity and cooking time increased, and apparent density and germination were reduced. Beans stored in the control, with any of the moisture contents, showed high quality loss during the long storage. It was concluded that it is possible to storage beans with moisture contents of 12.3% and 15.7%, with quality, for until 120 days, in hermetic conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beans with 12.3% and 15.7% moisture kept their other quality characteristics for 120 days in hermetic storage

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
moisture contents of 12.3% and 15.7% in hermetic conditionse1
Outcome
the other characteristicse1
Direction
were kepte1
Value
120 dayse1
Qualifier
Except for the electrical conductivity and cooking timee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“Except for the electrical conductivity and cooking time, the other characteristics were kept for 120 days in the stored product with moisture contents of 12.3% and 15.7% in hermetic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beans at 17.8% moisture showed increased electrical conductivity and cooking time under hermetic storage

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
17.8% of the moisture contente2
Outcome
electrical conductivity and cooking timee2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“Beans with 17.8% of the moisture content, electrical conductivity and cooking time increased, and apparent density and germination were reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beans at 17.8% moisture showed reduced apparent density and germination under hermetic storage

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
17.8% of the moisture contente2
Outcome
apparent density and germinatione2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“Beans with 17.8% of the moisture content, electrical conductivity and cooking time increased, and apparent density and germination were reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beans stored in the control (organza covering) showed high quality loss during long storage

Taxon
Beanse3
Treatment
stored in the controle3
Outcome
quality losse3
Direction
highe3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“Beans stored in the control, with any of the moisture contents, showed high quality loss during the long storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1045 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Beans with 12.3% and 15.7% moisture can be stored with quality for up to 120 days in hermetic conditions

Taxon
beanse4
Outcome
storage beans with moisture contents of 12.3% and 15.7%e4
Value
120 dayse4
Setting
in hermetic conditionse4

Verbatim

e4

“It was concluded that it is possible to storage beans with moisture contents of 12.3% and 15.7%, with quality, for until 120 days, in hermetic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1200 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: general · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

soil water · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.