Paper · 2015 · Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal

Impact of integrated nutrient management on growth, flowering, yield and economics of tuberose

K. Dhanumjaya Rao; P. Lalitha Kameswari; T. Baby Rani

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was conducted for three consecutive years during rabi from 2010–11 to 2012–13 at Floricultural Research Station, Hyderabad to study the influence of integrated nutrient management practices to improve the growth and flower yield of Tuberose cv. Hyderabad Double. The treatments consist of combination of organic fertilizers and bio inoculants along with different levels of NPK (100%, 75% and 50%RDF). Compared to 100% RDF with FYM alone, application of 75% RDF in integration with farm yard manure (FYM), vermicompos (VC), Azospirillum (AZO) and phosphate solubilizing bacteria(PSB) (T4) has significantly yielded maximum number of spikes per plant (2.33) with increased spike length, rachis length, number of florets per spike and also maximum number of bulbs per plant (32.60). B: C ratio ranged between 2.09–2.60 with its maximum exhibited by 75% RDF with FYM, VC, AZO and PSB(T4) followed by 50% RDF with FYM, VC, AZO and PSB (T7).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced the maximum 2.33 spikes per tuberose plant relative to 100% RDF with FYM alone.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
75% RDF in integration with farm yard manure (FYM), vermicompos (VC), Azospirillum (AZO) and phosphate solubilizing bacteria(PSB) (T4)e0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Second interactor
phosphate solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
number of spikes per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.33e0
Comparator
100% RDF with FYM alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to 100% RDF with FYM alone, application of 75% RDF in integration with farm yard manure (FYM), vermicompos (VC), Azospirillum (AZO) and phosphate solubilizing bacteria(PSB) (T4) has significantly yielded maximum number of spikes per plant (2.33)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased tuberose spike length, rachis length, and florets per spike relative to the comparator.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
75% RDF in integration with farm yard manure (FYM), vermicompos (VC), Azospirillum (AZO) and phosphate solubilizing bacteria(PSB) (T4)e0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Second interactor
phosphate solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
spike length, rachis length, number of florets per spikee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
100% RDF with FYM alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to 100% RDF with FYM alone, application of 75% RDF in integration with farm yard manure (FYM), vermicompos (VC), Azospirillum (AZO) and phosphate solubilizing bacteria(PSB) (T4) has significantly yielded maximum number of spikes per plant (2.33) with increased spike length, rachis length, number of florets per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced the maximum 32.60 bulbs per tuberose plant.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
75% RDF in integration with farm yard manure (FYM), vermicompos (VC), Azospirillum (AZO) and phosphate solubilizing bacteria(PSB) (T4)e0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Second interactor
phosphate solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
number of bulbs per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
32.60e0
Comparator
100% RDF with FYM alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to 100% RDF with FYM alone, application of 75% RDF in integration with farm yard manure (FYM), vermicompos (VC), Azospirillum (AZO) and phosphate solubilizing bacteria(PSB) (T4) has significantly yielded maximum number of spikes per plant (2.33) with increased spike length, rachis length, number of florets per spike and also maximum number of bulbs per plant (32.60).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had the maximum benefit-to-cost ratio among treatments, within the reported range of 2.09–2.60.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
75% RDF with FYM, VC, AZO and PSB(T4)e0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.09–2.60e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B: C ratio ranged between 2.09–2.60 with its maximum exhibited by 75% RDF with FYM, VC, AZO and PSB(T4) followed by 50% RDF with FYM, VC, AZO and PSB (T7).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 followed T4 in benefit-to-cost ratio.

Taxon
tuberoseAgave amicat0
Treatment
50% RDF with FYM, VC, AZO and PSB (T7)e0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
followede0
Comparator
75% RDF with FYM, VC, AZO and PSB(T4)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B: C ratio ranged between 2.09–2.60 with its maximum exhibited by 75% RDF with FYM, VC, AZO and PSB(T4) followed by 50% RDF with FYM, VC, AZO and PSB (T7).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“tuberose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–94 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 38 positive, 1 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

inoculation · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.