Paper · 2013 · ISRN Agronomy

Effect of Carboxymethyl Cellulose and Alginate Coating Combined with Brewer Yeast on Postharvest Grape Preservation

Ren Yinzhe; Zhang Shaoying

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of carboxymethyl cellulose and alginate coating combined with brewer yeast on postharvest grape preservation was investigated. The postharvest grapes were coated with 2% of alginate and 3% of carboxymethyl cellulose combined with1.5×109 CFU/mL of brewer yeast. The combined treatment samples showed good sensory character on day 13 compared with control samples or only coated samples. The increase of weight loss and decrease of total soluble solids of combined treatment grapes were restrained. Furthermore, the protective enzymes including superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalase of combined treatment sample showed higher activities. Accordingly, the increase of malonaldehyde content was also restrained and more vitamin C was preserved in combined treatment samples. At day 13, the weight loss rate and the total soluble solids of grape treated with coating + yeast were 23.6% lower and 20.6% higher than those of control samples, respectively. Coating grapes with 2% of alginate and 3% of carboxymethyl cellulose combined with brewer yeast of1.5×109 CFU/mL was a well-proven method to preserve postharvest grapes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined coating and yeast maintained better sensory character at day 13 than control or coating alone.

Taxon
grapet0
Organ / stage
postharvest grapet0
Treatment
combined treatmente0
Outcome
sensory charactere0
Direction
goode0
Comparator
control samples or only coated samplese0

Verbatim

e0

“The combined treatment samples showed good sensory character on day 13 compared with control samples or only coated samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–395 · show in text ↑
t0

“postharvest grape”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment restrained the increase of grape weight loss.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
combined treatmente0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
restrainede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The increase of weight loss and decrease of total soluble solids of combined treatment grapes were restrained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment restrained the decrease of total soluble solids.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
combined treatmente0
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Direction
restrainede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The increase of weight loss and decrease of total soluble solids of combined treatment grapes were restrained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment produced higher activities of three protective enzymes.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
combined treatmente0
Outcome
superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalasee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the protective enzymes including superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalase of combined treatment sample showed higher activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“postharvest grape”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment restrained the rise of malonaldehyde content.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
combined treatmente0
Outcome
malonaldehyde contente0
Direction
restrainede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the increase of malonaldehyde content was also restrained and more vitamin C was preserved in combined treatment samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“postharvest grape”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment preserved more vitamin C.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
combined treatmente0
Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the increase of malonaldehyde content was also restrained and more vitamin C was preserved in combined treatment samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“postharvest grape”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At day 13, treated grapes had 23.6% lower weight loss rate than controls.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
coating + yeaste0
Outcome
weight loss ratee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
23.6%e0
Qualifier
At day 13e0
Comparator
control samplese0

Verbatim

e0

“At day 13, the weight loss rate and the total soluble solids of grape treated with coating + yeast were 23.6% lower and 20.6% higher than those of control samples, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At day 13, treated grapes had 20.6% higher total soluble solids than controls.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
coating + yeaste0
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Direction
highere0
Value
20.6%e0
Qualifier
At day 13e0
Comparator
control samplese0

Verbatim

e0

“At day 13, the weight loss rate and the total soluble solids of grape treated with coating + yeast were 23.6% lower and 20.6% higher than those of control samples, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–967 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the combined alginate, carboxymethyl cellulose and yeast coating for preserving postharvest grapes.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
2% of alginate and 3% of carboxymethyl cellulose combined with brewer yeast of1.5×109 CFU/mLe0
Outcome
preserve postharvest grapese0

Verbatim

e0

“Coating grapes with 2% of alginate and 3% of carboxymethyl cellulose combined with brewer yeast of1.5×109 CFU/mL was a well-proven method to preserve postharvest grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1137 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.