Abstract
The main objective of this work is to study the effect of sulphur application and irrigation water quantity on some soil properties of the calcareous soils and to limit the suitable concentration to obtain satisfactory yield of faba beab under saline conditions. The study area (Tamyia district, Fayoum Governorate, Egypt) is characterized by a hot and dry climate in general with annual rainfall average of 8 mm/year, whereas the evaporation rates average ranging between 3.5 to10 mm/day. Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) was sown at 18 November 2010 and harvested at 26 April 2011. Total water consumed during faba bean growing season were 623.7 and747.2 m3/ fed for 100% and 120% irrigation treatments with increasing ranged between 3.5% and 3.7% in same sequence. Results showed that values of soil EC, pH and CaCO3 was improved as a result of both irrigation and S treatments. The improvement resulted in a gradual reduction of the studied soil properties by about 10.3%, 3.2%; 17.0% and 23.1%, 4.3%; 11.3% comparing S treated plot relative to the control plot at 100 and 120% irrigation treatments. Application S improved water content under studied soil constant and these increases were 8.8%, 11.8%, 8.3% and 16.9% for SP, FC, WP and AW, respectively relative to the control plots. Irrigation 100% had a positive effect on the drainable pores% which increased by about 7.0% comparing with 120% irrigation treatments. While hydraulic conductivity increased by about 16.4% and percentage of increase drainable pores was 14.0% and 21.4% for 100% and 120% irrigation treatments comparing 3rd layer with the 1st one, respectively. Increasing irrigation water from 100% to 120% resulted increasing in the studied macronutrients, N, P and K, by about 80.8%, 144.9% and 72.9%, respectively; while they increased in plant by about 118.8%, 132.8% and 62.2% as compared with the control one, respectively as a result of S application. Results showed that Na, Cl and Na/K ratio that increasing irrigation water caused increase by 2.02%, 11.11% for Na and Cl, while reduction in the ratio between Na and K was observed with value –15.7% as compared 120 with 100% irrigation treatments. S application cause slightly increases in Na content (3.55%) and moderately increases with Cl (34.38%), which led to decrease Na:K ratio by about 39.4%. Increasing irrigation water by 20%resulted in a gradual increase of both yield and water use efficiency (WUE) of faba bean plants compared with the control plants. Irrigation treatments significantly decreased the contents of proline in dry weight seed of faba bean gradually as a result of increase irrigation quantity (from 100% to 120%) and the reduction was 9.7%. While S addition decreased proline by about 15.9%. According to the interaction effect between irrigation and S application treatments, S improved proline content by about 20.4% and 11.2% relative to the control treatments under 100% and 120% irrigation treatments, respectively %.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation and sulfur reduced soil EC, pH and CaCO3.
- Taxon
- Faba bean
Vicia fabae1 - Treatment
- irrigation and S treatmentse0
- Outcome
- soil EC, pH and CaCO3e0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“values of soil EC, pH and CaCO3 was improved as a result of both irrigation and S treatments. The improvement resulted in a gradual reduction of the studied soil properties”
e1“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur increased soil water content at SP, FC, WP and AW.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabae1
- Treatment
- Application Se0
- Outcome
- water contente0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 8.8%, 11.8%, 8.3% and 16.9%e0
- Comparator
- control plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application S improved water content under studied soil constant and these increases were 8.8%, 11.8%, 8.3% and 16.9% for SP, FC, WP and AW, respectively relative to the control plots”
e1“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
At 100% irrigation, drainable pores increased about 7% versus 120%.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabae1
- Treatment
- Irrigation 100%e0
- Outcome
- drainable pores%e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 7.0%e0
- Comparator
- 120% irrigation treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation 100% had a positive effect on the drainable pores% which increased by about 7.0% comparing with 120% irrigation treatments”
e1“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Hydraulic conductivity increased about 16.4%.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabae1
- Outcome
- hydraulic conductivitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 16.4%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“hydraulic conductivity increased by about 16.4%”
e1“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing irrigation increased soil N by 80.8%.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabae1
- Treatment
- Increasing irrigation water from 100% to 120%e0
- Outcome
- Ne0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 80.8%e0
- Comparator
- 100%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increasing irrigation water from 100% to 120% resulted increasing in the studied macronutrients, N, P and K, by about 80.8%, 144.9% and 72.9%, respectively”
e1“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing irrigation increased soil P by 144.9%.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabae1
- Treatment
- Increasing irrigation water from 100% to 120%e0
- Outcome
- Pe0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 144.9%e0
- Comparator
- 100%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increasing irrigation water from 100% to 120% resulted increasing in the studied macronutrients, N, P and K, by about 80.8%, 144.9% and 72.9%, respectively”
e1“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing irrigation increased soil K by 72.9%.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabae1
- Treatment
- Increasing irrigation water from 100% to 120%e0
- Outcome
- Ke0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 72.9%e0
- Comparator
- 100%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increasing irrigation water from 100% to 120% resulted increasing in the studied macronutrients, N, P and K, by about 80.8%, 144.9% and 72.9%, respectively”
e1“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur increased plant N by 118.8%.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabae2
- Treatment
- S applicatione0
- Outcome
- Ne1
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 118.8%e0
- Comparator
- control onee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“they increased in plant by about 118.8%, 132.8% and 62.2% as compared with the control one, respectively as a result of S application”
e1“macronutrients, N, P and K”
e2“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur increased plant P by 132.8%.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabae2
- Treatment
- S applicatione0
- Outcome
- Pe1
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 132.8%e0
- Comparator
- control onee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“they increased in plant by about 118.8%, 132.8% and 62.2% as compared with the control one, respectively as a result of S application”
e1“macronutrients, N, P and K”
e2“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur increased plant K by 62.2%.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabae2
- Treatment
- S applicatione0
- Outcome
- Ke1
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 62.2%e0
- Comparator
- control onee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“they increased in plant by about 118.8%, 132.8% and 62.2% as compared with the control one, respectively as a result of S application”
e1“macronutrients, N, P and K”
e2“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing irrigation increased Na by 2.02%.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabae1
- Treatment
- increasing irrigation watere0
- Outcome
- Nae0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 2.02%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing irrigation water caused increase by 2.02%, 11.11% for Na and Cl”
e1“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing irrigation increased Cl by 11.11%.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabae1
- Treatment
- increasing irrigation watere0
- Outcome
- Cle0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 11.11%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing irrigation water caused increase by 2.02%, 11.11% for Na and Cl”
e1“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing irrigation reduced Na/K ratio by 15.7%.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabae1
- Treatment
- 120e0
- Outcome
- ratio between Na and Ke0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- –15.7%e0
- Comparator
- 100% irrigation treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“reduction in the ratio between Na and K was observed with value –15.7% as compared 120 with 100% irrigation treatments”
e1“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur increased Na content 3.55%.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabae1
- Treatment
- S applicatione0
- Outcome
- Na contente0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 3.55%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“S application cause slightly increases in Na content (3.55%)”
e1“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur increased Cl content 34.38%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“moderately increases with Cl (34.38%)”
e1“as a result of S application”
e2“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur decreased Na:K ratio about 39.4%.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabae2
- Treatment
- S applicatione1
- Outcome
- Na:K ratioe0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 39.4%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“decrease Na:K ratio by about 39.4%”
e1“as a result of S application”
e2“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Twenty percent more irrigation increased faba bean yield and WUE.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- Increasing irrigation water by 20%e0
- Outcome
- yield and water use efficiency (WUE)e0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- control plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increasing irrigation water by 20%resulted in a gradual increase of both yield and water use efficiency (WUE) of faba bean plants compared with the control plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing irrigation from 100% to 120% reduced seed proline 9.7%.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- increase irrigation quantity (from 100% to 120%)e0
- Outcome
- contents of proline in dry weight seede0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 9.7%e0
- Comparator
- 100%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation treatments significantly decreased the contents of proline in dry weight seed of faba bean gradually as a result of increase irrigation quantity (from 100% to 120%) and the reduction was 9.7%”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur decreased seed proline about 15.9%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“S addition decreased proline by about 15.9%”
e1“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur changed proline content by 20.4% and 11.2% at 100% and 120% irrigation.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabae1
- Treatment
- Se0
- Outcome
- proline contente0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 20.4% and 11.2%e0
- Comparator
- control treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“S improved proline content by about 20.4% and 11.2% relative to the control treatments under 100% and 120% irrigation treatments, respectively”
e1“Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · physiology: osmolytes · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
sulfur atom · soil: chemistry · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
irrigation · physiology: osmolytes · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
irrigation · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →irrigation · soil: chemistry · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.