Paper · 2012 · Journal of Food Science

Use of UV‐C Treatments to Maintain Quality and Extend the Shelf Life of Green Fresh‐cut Bell Pepper ( Capsicum annuum L.)

Luis M. Rodoni; Analía Concellón; Alicia R. Chaves; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The objective of this work was to select a Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) treatment for fresh-cut mature green bell pepper, and to evaluate the effect of its combination with refrigeration on quality maintenance. Bell pepper sticks were treated with 0, 3, 10, or 20 kJ/m² UV-C in the outer (O), inner (I), or both sides of the pericarp (I/O) and stored for 8 d at 10 °C. During the first 5 d of storage, all UV-C treatments reduced deterioration as compared to the control. The treatment with 20 kJ/m² I/O was the most effective to reduce deterioration, and was used for further evaluations. In a second group of experiments, mature green bell pepper sticks were treated with 20 kJ/m² I/O, stored at 5 °C for 7 or 12 d and assessed for physical and chemical analysis, and microbiological quality. UV-C-treated fruit showed lower exudates and shriveling than the control. UV exposure also reduced decay, tissue damage, and electrolyte leakage. After 12 d at 5 °C, UV-C irradiated peppers remained firmer and had higher resistance to deformation than the control. The UV-C treatments also reduced weight loss and pectin solubilization. UV-C exposure decreased the counts of mesophile bacteria and molds, and did not affect acidity or sugars. UV-C-treated fruit stored for 0 or 7 d at 5 °C did not show major differences in antioxidants from the control as measured against DPPH(•) or ABTS(•)⁺ radicals. Results suggest that UV-C exposure is useful to maintain quality of refrigerated fresh-cut green pepper. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Exposure to UV-C radiation before packing and refrigeration could be a useful nonchemical alternative to maintain quality and reduce postharvest losses in the fresh-cut industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All UV-C treatments reduced deterioration of fresh-cut bell pepper compared with the control during the first 5 days of storage.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
UV-C treatmentse0
Outcome
deterioratione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
During the first 5 d of storagee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“During the first 5 d of storage, all UV-C treatments reduced deterioration as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment with 20 kJ/m² UV-C on the inner and outer pericarp was the most effective treatment in reducing deterioration of fresh-cut bell pepper.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
20 kJ/m² I/Oe1
Outcome
deterioratione1
Direction
most effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatment with 20 kJ/m² I/O was the most effective to reduce deterioration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C treated fresh-cut bell pepper showed lower exudates and shriveling than the control.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
UV-Ce2
Outcome
exudates and shrivelinge2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
controle2

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
e2

“UV-C-treated fruit showed lower exudates and shriveling than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV exposure reduced decay, tissue damage and electrolyte leakage of fresh-cut bell pepper.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
UV exposuree3
Outcome
decay, tissue damage, and electrolyte leakagee3
Direction
reducede3
Comparator
controle2

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
e2

“UV-C-treated fruit showed lower exudates and shriveling than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–871 · show in text ↑
e3

“UV exposure also reduced decay, tissue damage, and electrolyte leakage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C irradiated bell pepper remained firmer than the control after 12 days at 5 °C.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
UV-Ce5
Outcome
firmere5
Direction
firmere5
Qualifier
After 12 d at 5 °Ce5
Comparator
controle5

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
e5

“After 12 d at 5 °C, UV-C irradiated peppers remained firmer and had higher resistance to deformation than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C irradiated bell pepper had higher resistance to deformation than the control after 12 days at 5 °C.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
UV-Ce5
Outcome
resistance to deformatione5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
After 12 d at 5 °Ce5
Comparator
controle5

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
e5

“After 12 d at 5 °C, UV-C irradiated peppers remained firmer and had higher resistance to deformation than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The UV-C treatments reduced weight loss and pectin solubilization of fresh-cut bell pepper compared with the control.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
UV-C treatmentse4
Outcome
weight loss and pectin solubilizatione4
Direction
reducede4
Comparator
controle2

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
e2

“UV-C-treated fruit showed lower exudates and shriveling than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–871 · show in text ↑
e4

“The UV-C treatments also reduced weight loss and pectin solubilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C exposure decreased the counts of mesophile bacteria and molds on fresh-cut bell pepper.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
UV-C exposuree6
Interactor
mesophile bacteriae6other
Second interactor
moldse6other
Outcome
counts of mesophile bacteria and moldse6
Direction
decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
e6

“UV-C exposure decreased the counts of mesophile bacteria and molds, and did not affect acidity or sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C exposure did not affect acidity or sugars of fresh-cut bell pepper.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
UV-C exposuree6
Outcome
acidity or sugarse6
Direction
did not affecte6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
e6

“UV-C exposure decreased the counts of mesophile bacteria and molds, and did not affect acidity or sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C-treated fresh-cut bell pepper stored for 0 or 7 days at 5 °C showed no major differences in antioxidants from the control.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
UV-Ce7
Outcome
antioxidantse7
Direction
did not show major differencese7
Qualifier
stored for 0 or 7 d at 5 °Ce7
Comparator
controle7

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
e7

“UV-C-treated fruit stored for 0 or 7 d at 5 °C did not show major differences in antioxidants from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1352 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C exposure is useful to maintain quality of refrigerated fresh-cut bell pepper as a nonchemical alternative.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
UV-C exposuree7
Outcome
qualitye7

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99 · show in text ↑
e7

“Results suggest that UV-C exposure is useful to maintain quality of refrigerated fresh-cut green pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1506 · show in text ↑

uv · molecular: metabolites · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

uv · quality: sugar starch · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

uv · disease · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

uv · quality: postharvest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.