Paper · 1946 · Annals of Applied Biology

A note on the relation of nematodes (Tylenchus tritici) to the development of the bacterial disease of wheat caused by Bacterium tritici

C. C. Cheo

4
claims
13
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Inoculation experiments using bacteria alone did not produce the bacterial disease of wheat: inoculations with mixed bacteria and nematodes were successful. The bacteria within the nematode galls retain their viability for 2 1/2 years. The bacterial disease is more damaging to the wheat plant than the nematode infection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria alone failed to produce bacterial disease of wheat.

Treatment
bacteria alonee0
Interactor
Bacterium triticit0pathogen
Outcome
bacterial disease of wheate0
Direction
did not producee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation experiments using bacteria alone did not produce the bacterial disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacterium tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed bacteria and nematode inoculations produced the disease.

Treatment
mixed bacteria and nematodese0
Interactor
Bacterium triticit1pathogen
Second interactor
Tylenchus triticit0pest
Outcome
bacterial disease of wheate1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculations with mixed bacteria and nematodes were successful”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–155 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–91 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tylenchus tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacterium tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–136 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria in nematode galls remained viable for 2 1/2 years.

Interactor
Bacterium triticit0pathogen
Second interactor
Tylenchus triticit1pest
Outcome
bacteria within the nematode galls retain their viabilitye0
Value
2 1/2 yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacteria within the nematode galls retain their viability for 2 1/2 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacterium tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–136 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tylenchus tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial disease damaged wheat more than nematode infection.

Interactor
Bacterium triticit0pathogen
Second interactor
Tylenchus triticit1pest
Outcome
bacterial diseasee0
Direction
more damaginge0
Comparator
nematode infectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterial disease is more damaging to the wheat plant than the nematode infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacterium tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–136 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tylenchus tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–54 · show in text ↑

inoculation · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 24 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.