Paper · 1988 · Phytopathology

Effects of Rhizobacteria on Root-Knot Nematodes and Gall Formation

J. O. Becker

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
105
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Three hundred and fifty-four randomly selected bacteria from plant rhizospheres, when tested for activity against Meloidogyne incognita, caused a wide range of effects from a reduction to an increase of root galling on tomato and cucumber in greenhouse tests. Results were highly variable, even with strains that previously had given significant differences. A bioassay, based on selecting bacterial strains that produced nematicidal compounds in vitro, proved to be a better and more rapid means of identifying promising nematode antagonists. About 1% of more than 5,000 bacteria isolated from rhizospheres of different plants produced detectable compounds that affected the vitality of second-stage juveniles of M. incognita in an in vitro test. Twenty percent of these subsequently reduced the number of galls on cucumber in a soil-free pouch system when applied as a seed treatment. Selected strains were applied as a drench to nonsterile soil infested with M. incognita. White clover plants growing in bacteria-treated soil had fewer galls and larger root systems. Both plant top and root weights were significantly greater compared with the nontreated control

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere bacteria caused a range from reduced to increased root galling in tomato.

Treatment
bacteria from plant rhizospherese0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
root gallinge0
Direction
from a reduction to an increasee0
Setting
greenhouse testse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacteria from plant rhizospheres, when tested for activity against Meloidogyne incognita, caused a wide range of effects from a reduction to an increase of root galling on tomato and cucumber in greenhouse tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere bacteria caused a range from reduced to increased root galling in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
bacteria from plant rhizospherese0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
root gallinge0
Direction
from a reduction to an increasee0
Setting
greenhouse testse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacteria from plant rhizospheres, when tested for activity against Meloidogyne incognita, caused a wide range of effects from a reduction to an increase of root galling on tomato and cucumber in greenhouse tests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–259 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effects varied considerably, including for previously significant strains.

Outcome
Results were highly variablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results were highly variable, even with strains that previously had given significant differences.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–358 · show in text ↑
e1

“root galling on tomato and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–238 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An in vitro nematicidal screen identified promising nematode antagonists more rapidly and effectively.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Outcome
identifying promising nematode antagonistse0
Comparator
better and more rapid meanse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A bioassay, based on selecting bacterial strains that produced nematicidal compounds in vitro, proved to be a better and more rapid means of identifying promising nematode antagonists.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–543 · show in text ↑
e1

“root galling on tomato and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–238 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 1% of rhizosphere bacteria affected M. incognita juvenile vitality in vitro.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
vitality of second-stage juveniles of M. incognitae0
Value
1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About 1% of more than 5,000 bacteria isolated from rhizospheres of different plants produced detectable compounds that affected the vitality of second-stage juveniles of M. incognita in an in vitro test.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty percent of selected bacteria reduced cucumber galls after seed treatment.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
seed treatmente0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
number of gallse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
Twenty percente0
Setting
soil-free pouch systeme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Twenty percent of these subsequently reduced the number of galls on cucumber in a soil-free pouch system when applied as a seed treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“juveniles of M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria-treated soil yielded fewer galls on white clover.

Taxon
White cloverTrifolium repense0
Treatment
bacteria-treated soile0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
gallse0
Direction
fewere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selected strains were applied as a drench to nonsterile soil infested with M. incognita. White clover plants growing in bacteria-treated soil had fewer galls and larger root systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria-treated soil yielded larger white clover root systems.

Taxon
White cloverTrifolium repense0
Treatment
bacteria-treated soile0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
root systemse0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“White clover plants growing in bacteria-treated soil had fewer galls and larger root systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1069 · show in text ↑
e1

“infested with M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatment significantly increased white clover top weight versus untreated control.

Taxon
White cloverTrifolium repense1
Outcome
plant tope0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both plant top and root weights were significantly greater compared with the nontreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1165 · show in text ↑
e1

“White clover plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatment significantly increased white clover root weight versus untreated control.

Taxon
White cloverTrifolium repense1
Treatment
bacteria-treated soile2
Outcome
root weightse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both plant top and root weights were significantly greater compared with the nontreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1165 · show in text ↑
e1

“White clover plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–995 · show in text ↑
e2

“bacteria-treated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1028 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · Meloidogyne incognita · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.