Paper · 2010 · Peanut Science

Effect of Imazapic and 2,4-DB on Peanut Yield, Grade, and Seed Germination

W. H. Faircloth; E. P. Prostko

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Recurrent problems with peanut seed germination and stand establishment have raised concerns about the potential effects of herbicides on peanut seed quality. Field trials were conducted in south Georgia in 2005 and 2006 to evaluate the effects of imazapic and 2,4-DB on peanut yield, grade, incidence of tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), and seed germination. Imazapic at 71 g ai ha−1, applied at 30 and 40 days after planting (DAP), and 2,4-DB at 270 g ai ha−1, applied at 75 or 90 DAP, had no effect on peanut yield, grade, incidence of TSWV, and seed germination when averaged over two locations (Dawson and Tifton) and three cultivars (Georgia Green, Georgia-01R, and C-99R). Normal cultivar yield variations were observed; however, Georgia-01R had reduced standard (25 C) and cold (15 C) germination when compared to the other cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapic did not affect peanut yield or grade.

Treatment
Imazapic at 71 g ai ha−1e0
Outcome
peanut yield, gradee0
Direction
had no effecte0
Setting
Dawson and Tiftone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazapic at 71 g ai ha−1, applied at 30 and 40 days after planting (DAP), and 2,4-DB at 270 g ai ha−1, applied at 75 or 90 DAP, had no effect on peanut yield, grade, incidence of TSWV, and seed germination when averaged over two locations (Dawson and Tifton) and three cultivars (Georgia Green, Georgia-01R, and C-99R).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapic did not affect TSWV incidence.

Treatment
Imazapic at 71 g ai ha−1e0
Interactor
TSWVOrthotospovirus tomatomaculaee0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of TSWVe0
Direction
had no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazapic at 71 g ai ha−1, applied at 30 and 40 days after planting (DAP), and 2,4-DB at 270 g ai ha−1, applied at 75 or 90 DAP, had no effect on peanut yield, grade, incidence of TSWV, and seed germination when averaged over two locations (Dawson and Tifton) and three cultivars (Georgia Green, Georgia-01R, and C-99R).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapic did not affect peanut seed germination.

Treatment
Imazapic at 71 g ai ha−1e0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
had no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazapic at 71 g ai ha−1, applied at 30 and 40 days after planting (DAP), and 2,4-DB at 270 g ai ha−1, applied at 75 or 90 DAP, had no effect on peanut yield, grade, incidence of TSWV, and seed germination when averaged over two locations (Dawson and Tifton) and three cultivars (Georgia Green, Georgia-01R, and C-99R).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-DB did not affect peanut yield or grade.

Treatment
2,4-DB at 270 g ai ha−1e0
Outcome
peanut yield, gradee0
Direction
had no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazapic at 71 g ai ha−1, applied at 30 and 40 days after planting (DAP), and 2,4-DB at 270 g ai ha−1, applied at 75 or 90 DAP, had no effect on peanut yield, grade, incidence of TSWV, and seed germination when averaged over two locations (Dawson and Tifton) and three cultivars (Georgia Green, Georgia-01R, and C-99R).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-DB did not affect TSWV incidence.

Treatment
2,4-DB at 270 g ai ha−1e0
Interactor
TSWVOrthotospovirus tomatomaculaee0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of TSWVe0
Direction
had no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazapic at 71 g ai ha−1, applied at 30 and 40 days after planting (DAP), and 2,4-DB at 270 g ai ha−1, applied at 75 or 90 DAP, had no effect on peanut yield, grade, incidence of TSWV, and seed germination when averaged over two locations (Dawson and Tifton) and three cultivars (Georgia Green, Georgia-01R, and C-99R).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-DB did not affect seed germination.

Treatment
2,4-DB at 270 g ai ha−1e0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
had no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazapic at 71 g ai ha−1, applied at 30 and 40 days after planting (DAP), and 2,4-DB at 270 g ai ha−1, applied at 75 or 90 DAP, had no effect on peanut yield, grade, incidence of TSWV, and seed germination when averaged over two locations (Dawson and Tifton) and three cultivars (Georgia Green, Georgia-01R, and C-99R).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–689 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Georgia-01R had lower standard and cold germination than the other cultivars.

Material
Georgia-01Re0
Outcome
standard (25 C) and cold (15 C) germinatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
other cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Georgia-01R had reduced standard (25 C) and cold (15 C) germination when compared to the other cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑

imazapic · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
    Imazapic gave higher yields in 2000.

    Conservation Tillage and Herbicide Management for Two Peanut Cultivars · 2005 · compared with paraquat plus acifluorfen plus bentazon

    Opposite direction

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

imazapic · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.