Paper · 1994 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Time of nitrogen application and yield of Bengal lychee on a sandy loam soil in subtropical Queensland

CM Menzel; GF Haydon; VJ Doogan; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) was applied over 4 years to 6-year-old lychee trees (Litchi chinensis Sonn. cv. Bengal) growing in subtropical Queensland (lat. 27¦S.) on a sandy loam soil (0-15 cm) with 2.8 mg nitrate-N/kg, to determine the effect of time of N application on leaf N concentration, vegetative growth, flowering, and yield. Applications of N (equivalent to 750 kg N/ha in year 4) were made after panicle emergence in July, after harvest in January, or split between the 2 periods. Control trees received no N. Leaf N concentrations in April-June were, on average, about 0.1% lower after a single N application in winter than application in summer or split applications. Leaf N concentrations in November-February were about 0.1% higher after winter or split N applications than after summer applications. Timing of fertiliser application had no affect on yield. It took 4 years without N fertiliser to show significant reductions in yield compared with fertilised trees. In year 4, yield increased from 20 to 60 kg/tree on individual pairs of trees as leaf N in August increased from 0.95 to 1.56%. Lower yields in control trees in year 4 were associated with poor leaf growth in the previous 2 years, and with lower concentrations of N in the panicles, leaves, twigs, and small branches, as well as lower chlorophyll concentrations and net CO2 assimilation after fruit set, compared with trees receiving N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter application yielded lower April-June leaf N than summer or split applications.

Treatment
single N application in wintere0
Outcome
Leaf N concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
about 0.1%e0
Comparator
application in summer or split applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi chinensis
Litchi chinensis · TaxonBarry Fitzgerald, USDA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf N concentrations in April-June were, on average, about 0.1% lower after a single N application in winter than application in summer or split applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“lychee”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter or split application yielded higher November-February leaf N than summer application.

Treatment
winter or split N applicationse0
Outcome
Leaf N concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Value
about 0.1%e0
Comparator
summer applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi chinensis
Litchi chinensis · TaxonBarry Fitzgerald, USDA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf N concentrations in November-February were about 0.1% higher after winter or split N applications than after summer applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“lychee”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer timing did not affect yield.

Treatment
Timing of fertiliser applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi chinensis
Litchi chinensis · TaxonBarry Fitzgerald, USDA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Timing of fertiliser application had no affect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“lychee”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Four years without nitrogen reduced yield relative to fertilized trees.

Treatment
4 years without N fertilisere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Comparator
fertilised treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi chinensis
Litchi chinensis · TaxonBarry Fitzgerald, USDA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It took 4 years without N fertiliser to show significant reductions in yield compared with fertilised trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“lychee”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year-four yield rose from 20 to 60 kg/tree with increasing August leaf N.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20 to 60 kg/treee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi chinensis
Litchi chinensis · TaxonBarry Fitzgerald, USDA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In year 4, yield increased from 20 to 60 kg/tree on individual pairs of trees as leaf N in August increased from 0.95 to 1.56%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“lychee”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower control-tree yields accompanied poor prior leaf growth and lower N in multiple organs.

Outcome
Lower yieldse0
Direction
Lowere0
Comparator
control treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi chinensis
Litchi chinensis · TaxonBarry Fitzgerald, USDA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower yields in control trees in year 4 were associated with poor leaf growth in the previous 2 years, and with lower concentrations of N in the panicles, leaves, twigs, and small branches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“lychee”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower control-tree yields accompanied lower chlorophyll and CO2 assimilation after fruit set.

Outcome
chlorophyll concentrations and net CO2 assimilatione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
trees receiving Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi chinensis
Litchi chinensis · TaxonBarry Fitzgerald, USDA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower chlorophyll concentrations and net CO2 assimilation after fruit set, compared with trees receiving N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“lychee”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Litchi chinensis (lychee)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.