Paper · 1998 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Effects of Spur Defoliation and Girdling on Fruit Growth, Fruit Quality, and Leaf and Shoot Carbohydrate Levels on the Spurs of Different Ages in 'Nijisseiki' Pear.

Yuanwen Teng; Kenji Tanabe; Fumio Tamura; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Defoliation and girdling were performed on spurs of different ages of 'Nijisseiki' pears (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) 10 days after anthesis, and the effects on fruit growth and quality, carbohydrate levels of leaves and shoots on the spurs were determined. Girdling resulted in the reduction of fruit size and fresh weight on 1-and 3-year-old spurs at harvest, but did not affect fruit growth, final size, and fresh weight on 5- and 7-year-old spurs. Complete spur leaf removal (100% LR) had little effect on fruit development on 1-year-old spurs during the whole growing season, but significantly retarded fruit development and decreased the final size of fruit on spurs over 3 years old. This treatment also increased flesh firmness, soluble solids and pH of fruit on spurs over 3 years old which may be related to the decreased fruit size. Presence of bourse shoot and 50% LR treatment had little effect on the final size of fruit on the spurs of different ages. Our results indicate that spur leaves play a more significant role in fruit growth and development as the spur age increases. The growth and development of fruit on a 1-year-old spur depends to a great extent, on the leaves external to the spur complex ; whereas fruits on 5-year-old spurs or older depend on their own spur leaves under normal conditions. On 3-year-old spurs, the fruit is nourished by its spur leaves and leaves outside the spur. Spur leaves seem to have an important role in the accumulation of carbohydrates in the spur, especially in the older parts of the spur shoot.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling reduced fruit size and fresh weight on one and three year old spurs.

Material
'Nijisseiki't0
Organ / stage
1-and 3-year-old spurse0
Treatment
Girdlinge0
Outcome
fruit size and fresh weighte0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Girdling resulted in the reduction of fruit size and fresh weight on 1-and 3-year-old spurs at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–355 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Nijisseiki' Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling did not affect fruit growth, final size or fresh weight on five and seven year old spurs.

Organ / stage
5- and 7-year-old spurse0
Outcome
fruit growth, final size, and fresh weighte0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not affect fruit growth, final size, and fresh weight on 5- and 7-year-old spurs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Nijisseiki' Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complete leaf removal had little effect on development of fruit on one year old spurs.

Organ / stage
1-year-old spurse0
Treatment
Complete spur leaf removal (100% LR)e0
Outcome
fruit developmente0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Complete spur leaf removal (100% LR) had little effect on fruit development on 1-year-old spurs during the whole growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Nijisseiki' Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Complete leaf removal retarded fruit development and decreased final fruit size on spurs over three years old.

Organ / stage
spurs over 3 years olde0
Treatment
Complete spur leaf removal (100% LR)e1
Outcome
fruit development and decreased the final size of fruite0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly retarded fruit development and decreased the final size of fruit on spurs over 3 years old”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–684 · show in text ↑
e1

“Complete spur leaf removal (100% LR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Nijisseiki' Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complete leaf removal increased fruit flesh firmness, soluble solids and pH on older spurs.

Organ / stage
fruit on spurs over 3 years olde0
Treatment
Complete spur leaf removal (100% LR)e1
Outcome
flesh firmness, soluble solids and pHe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also increased flesh firmness, soluble solids and pH of fruit on spurs over 3 years old”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–788 · show in text ↑
e1

“Complete spur leaf removal (100% LR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Nijisseiki' Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bourse shoot presence had little effect on final fruit size.

Treatment
Presence of bourse shoote0
Outcome
final size of fruite0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Presence of bourse shoot and 50% LR treatment had little effect on the final size of fruit on the spurs of different ages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Nijisseiki' Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty percent leaf removal had little effect on final fruit size.

Treatment
50% LR treatmente0
Outcome
final size of fruite0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Presence of bourse shoot and 50% LR treatment had little effect on the final size of fruit on the spurs of different ages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Nijisseiki' Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–163 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Spur leaves played a larger role in fruit growth as spur age increased.

Organ / stage
spur leavese0
Outcome
fruit growth and developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spur leaves play a more significant role in fruit growth and development as the spur age increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Nijisseiki' Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–163 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

One year old spur fruit depended largely on leaves outside the spur complex.

Organ / stage
leaves external to the spur complexe0
Outcome
growth and development of fruit on a 1-year-old spure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and development of fruit on a 1-year-old spur depends to a great extent, on the leaves external to the spur complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Nijisseiki' Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–163 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit on spurs five years and older depended on their own spur leaves.

Organ / stage
spur leavese0
Outcome
fruits on 5-year-old spurs or older depend on their own spur leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits on 5-year-old spurs or older depend on their own spur leaves under normal conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Nijisseiki' Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–163 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Three year old spur fruit was nourished by its spur leaves and outside leaves.

Organ / stage
spur leaves and leaves outside the spure0
Outcome
fruit is nourishede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On 3-year-old spurs, the fruit is nourished by its spur leaves and leaves outside the spur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Nijisseiki' Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–163 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Spur leaves appeared important for carbohydrate accumulation, especially in older spur shoots.

Organ / stage
Spur leavese0
Outcome
accumulation of carbohydrates in the spure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spur leaves seem to have an important role in the accumulation of carbohydrates in the spur, especially in the older parts of the spur shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Nijisseiki' Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–163 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

pruning · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.