Paper · 1998 · Plant Disease

Reduction of Green Mold on Grapefruit after Hot Forced-Air Quarantine Treatment

Krista C. Shellie; Mani Skaria

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Lesions on grapefruit developing from wounds inoculated with a spore suspension of Penicillium digitatum just prior to heating for 300 min in 46°C moist, forced air developed less rapidly during 4 days of storage at 21°C than lesions formed from inoculations made after the fruit were heated, or lesions on non-heated fruit. Since the lesion size on fruit inoculated after heating was similar to that on fruit that were not heated, induced host resistance via lignification or accumulation of phytoalexins probably did not occur. Results from this research demonstrate that development of green mold on grapefruit caused by P. digitatum is inhibited by time and temperature regimes of moist, forced air that are known to provide quarantine security against Mexican fruit fly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lesions from preheating inoculation developed less rapidly than lesions from postheating inoculation.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisie0
Treatment
heating for 300 min in 46°C moist, forced aire0
Interactor
Penicillium digitatumPenicillium digitatume0pathogen
Outcome
Lesions on grapefruite0
Direction
less rapidlye0
Comparator
inoculations made after the fruit were heatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lesions on grapefruit developing from wounds inoculated with a spore suspension of Penicillium digitatum just prior to heating for 300 min in 46°C moist, forced air developed less rapidly during 4 days of storage at 21°C than lesions formed from inoculations made after the fruit were heated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lesions from preheating inoculation developed less rapidly than on unheated fruit.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisie0
Treatment
heating for 300 min in 46°C moist, forced aire0
Interactor
Penicillium digitatumPenicillium digitatume0pathogen
Outcome
Lesions on grapefruite0
Direction
less rapidlye0
Comparator
non-heated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lesions on grapefruit developing from wounds inoculated with a spore suspension of Penicillium digitatum just prior to heating for 300 min in 46°C moist, forced air developed less rapidly during 4 days of storage at 21°C than lesions formed from inoculations made after the fruit were heated, or lesions on non-heated fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lesion size after postheating inoculation was similar to that on unheated fruit.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisit0
Treatment
inoculated after heatinge0
Interactor
Green Moldt0pathogen
Outcome
lesion sizee0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
fruit that were not heatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lesion size on fruit inoculated after heating was similar to that on fruit that were not heated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–430 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Mold on Grapefruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–37 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer heating did not induce host resistance through lignification or phytoalexins.

Taxon
GrapefruitCitrus ×paradisit0
Outcome
induced host resistancee0
Qualifier
lignification or accumulation of phytoalexinse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“induced host resistance via lignification or accumulation of phytoalexins probably did not occur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapefruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37 · show in text ↑

heat · disease · Citrus x paradisi (grapefruit)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · disease · Citrus x paradisi (grapefruit)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

heat · Penicillium digitatum · Citrus x paradisi (grapefruit)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.