Paper · 1998 · Journal of Applied Entomology

First release of Teretriosoma nigrescens Lewis (Col., Histeridae), the predator of Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Col. Bostrichidae), and follow‐up investigations in southern Togo

J. Richter; A. Biliwa; J. Helbig; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract: The predator Teretriosoma nigrescens Lewis was released in southern Togo for the first time in 1991. Followup storage trials were carried out after this first release of the predator in order to investigate effects on its prey, the storage pest Prostephanus truncatus (Horn), in maize stores. Two trials were installed in the same villages (Tsagba as release village and Dafo as control), one in the storage season 1990/91 and the other in 1992/93. A third trial was set up in Morétan (release village) and Akaba (control) in 1993 together with the second release of T. nigrescens. The storage period lasted 8 months with sampling every 2 months. The number of P. truncatus was reduced by 56.4% in stores with presence of T. nigrescens as compared to the control after 8 months of storage in 1990/91. Damage and losses of stored maize cobs were 40.7% and 47.4% smaller than without the predator. One year after the release, larger numbers of the predator were observed in stores. Again, P. truncatus was reduced by T. nigrescens , but this was not as visible as before. In the third trial in Morétan, 1993, shortly after the second release of T. nigrescens , again a decrease of numbers of the Larger Grain Borer was observed in stores after 8 months of storage, together with a reduction of damage and losses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predator presence reduced P. truncatus numbers by 56.4% after eight months in 1990/91.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
presence of T. nigrescense0
Interactor
P. truncatusProstephanus truncatuse0pest
Second interactor
T. nigrescensTeretrius nigrescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of P. truncatuse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
56.4%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prostephanus truncatus
Prostephanus truncatus · InteractorSarah McCaffrey, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize stores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–301 · show in text ↑
e0

“The number of P. truncatus was reduced by 56.4% in stores with presence of T. nigrescens as compared to the control after 8 months of storage in 1990/91”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predator presence reduced damage to stored maize cobs by 40.7%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
cobse0
Treatment
predatore0
Outcome
Damagee0
Direction
smallere0
Value
40.7%e0
Comparator
without the predatore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize stores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–301 · show in text ↑
e0

“Damage and losses of stored maize cobs were 40.7% and 47.4% smaller than without the predator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predator presence reduced losses of stored maize cobs by 47.4%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
cobse0
Treatment
predatore0
Outcome
losses of stored maize cobse0
Direction
smallere0
Value
47.4%e0
Comparator
without the predatore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize stores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–301 · show in text ↑
e0

“Damage and losses of stored maize cobs were 40.7% and 47.4% smaller than without the predator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–904 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predator numbers in stores were larger one year after release.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
larger numbers of the predatore0
Direction
largere0
Qualifier
One year after the releasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize stores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–301 · show in text ↑
e0

“One year after the release, larger numbers of the predator were observed in stores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A year after release, P. truncatus was again reduced, although less visibly.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T. nigrescense0
Interactor
P. truncatusProstephanus truncatuse0pest
Second interactor
T. nigrescensTeretrius nigrescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
P. truncatuse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
not as visible as beforee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prostephanus truncatus
Prostephanus truncatus · InteractorSarah McCaffrey, Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize stores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–301 · show in text ↑
e0

“Again, P. truncatus was reduced by T. nigrescens , but this was not as visible as before”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the second predator release in Morétan, Larger Grain Borer numbers declined after eight months.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
second release of T. nigrescense0
Interactor
Larger Grain Borere0pest
Second interactor
T. nigrescensTeretrius nigrescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
numbers of the Larger Grain Borere0
Direction
decreasee0
Setting
Morétane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize stores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–301 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the third trial in Morétan, 1993, shortly after the second release of T. nigrescens , again a decrease of numbers of the Larger Grain Borer was observed in stores after 8 months of storage, together with a reduction of damage and losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The third trial found reduced damage and losses in maize stores.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Larger Grain Borere0pest
Outcome
damage and lossese0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize stores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–301 · show in text ↑
e0

“a decrease of numbers of the Larger Grain Borer was observed in stores after 8 months of storage, together with a reduction of damage and losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1319 · show in text ↑

Teretrius nigrescens · Prostephanus truncatus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biocontrol · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

biocontrol · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.